• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心肌梗死后的住院时长:基于风险评估的出院时间与实际临床实践对比

Hospitalization Length after Myocardial Infarction: Risk-Assessment-Based Time of Hospital Discharge vs. Real Life Practice.

作者信息

Węgiel Michał, Dziewierz Artur, Wojtasik-Bakalarz Joanna, Sorysz Danuta, Surdacki Andrzej, Bartuś Stanisław, Dudek Dariusz, Rakowski Tomasz

机构信息

2nd Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, University Hospital in Krakow, 31-501 Krakow, Poland.

Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-501 Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2018 Dec 18;7(12):564. doi: 10.3390/jcm7120564.

DOI:10.3390/jcm7120564
PMID:30567307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6306951/
Abstract

According to guidelines, it is safe for low-risk patients with myocardial infarction (MI) to be discharged within 72 h of hospitalization. However, results coming from registries show that the hospital stay is often much longer in a real-life situation. Data on the length of the hospital stay (LOS) of MI patients in Polish centers are lacking. We enrolled 212 consecutive patients with acute MI. Low-risk patients were defined according to PAMI II criteria: age <70 years, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >45%, no persistent ventricular arrhythmia, and no multi-vessel disease (MVD). The median of the hospitalization length was eight days (Q1: 6; Q3: 9). In low-risk patients (25%), the median of LOS was six days (Q1: 5; Q3: 7) ( < 0.001). In a logistic regression analysis patients age, LVEF, ST-segment-elevation MI and the presence of MVD were independent predictors of longer hospitals stay (≥8 days). During follow up, there were no significant differences in the rates of clinical events between patients with shorter (<8 days) and longer (≥8 days) hospitalization. In a real-life situation, the LOS, even in low-risk patients is much longer than recommended in the guidelines.

摘要

根据指南,心肌梗死(MI)低风险患者在住院72小时内出院是安全的。然而,登记处的数据显示,在现实生活中,住院时间往往长得多。波兰各中心缺乏关于MI患者住院时间(LOS)的数据。我们纳入了212例连续的急性MI患者。低风险患者根据PAMI II标准定义:年龄<70岁、左心室射血分数(LVEF)>45%、无持续性室性心律失常且无多支血管病变(MVD)。住院时间的中位数为8天(第一四分位数:6;第三四分位数:9)。在低风险患者(25%)中,LOS的中位数为6天(第一四分位数:5;第三四分位数:7)(<0.001)。在逻辑回归分析中,患者年龄、LVEF、ST段抬高型MI以及MVD的存在是住院时间较长(≥8天)的独立预测因素。在随访期间,住院时间较短(<8天)和较长(≥8天)的患者之间临床事件发生率没有显著差异。在现实生活中,即使是低风险患者,LOS也比指南中建议的长得多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee23/6306951/72e42e6a0f33/jcm-07-00564-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee23/6306951/131c0637e153/jcm-07-00564-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee23/6306951/dd076ee0cfa1/jcm-07-00564-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee23/6306951/72e42e6a0f33/jcm-07-00564-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee23/6306951/131c0637e153/jcm-07-00564-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee23/6306951/dd076ee0cfa1/jcm-07-00564-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee23/6306951/72e42e6a0f33/jcm-07-00564-g003a.jpg

相似文献

1
Hospitalization Length after Myocardial Infarction: Risk-Assessment-Based Time of Hospital Discharge vs. Real Life Practice.心肌梗死后的住院时长:基于风险评估的出院时间与实际临床实践对比
J Clin Med. 2018 Dec 18;7(12):564. doi: 10.3390/jcm7120564.
2
Safety and cost-effectiveness of early discharge after primary angioplasty in low risk patients with acute myocardial infarction. PAMI-II Investigators. Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction.低风险急性心肌梗死患者直接血管成形术后早期出院的安全性和成本效益。PAMI-II研究人员。心肌梗死直接血管成形术。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Apr;31(5):967-72. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00031-x.
3
Left ventricular ejection fraction assessment among patients with acute myocardial infarction and its association with hospital quality of care and evidence-based therapy use.急性心肌梗死患者左心室射血分数评估及其与医院医疗质量和循证治疗应用的关联。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):662-71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965012. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
4
Predicting Length of Stay and the Need for Postacute Care After Acute Myocardial Infarction to Improve Healthcare Efficiency.预测急性心肌梗死后的住院时间及急性后期护理需求以提高医疗效率。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Sep;11(9):e004635. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004635.
5
Inter-hospital variation in length of hospital stay after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Belgian STEMI registry.ST段抬高型心肌梗死后住院时间的医院间差异:来自比利时ST段抬高型心肌梗死注册研究的结果
Acta Cardiol. 2013 Jun;68(3):235-9. doi: 10.1080/ac.68.3.2983416.
6
Hospital length of stay and clinical outcomes in older STEMI patients after primary PCI: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,老年 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的住院时间和临床结局:来自全国心血管数据登记处的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 31;65(12):1161-1171. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.01.028.
7
[Clinical outcomes and safety of primary percutaneous coronary intervention combined with tirofiban therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction].[急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合替罗非班治疗的临床疗效及安全性]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2007 Nov;35(11):1005-9.
8
Elevated end-diastolic wall stress after acute myocardial infarction predicts adverse cardiovascular outcomes and longer hospital length of stay.急性心肌梗死后舒张末期壁应力升高预示不良心血管结局及更长的住院时间。
Echocardiography. 2018 Nov;35(11):1721-1728. doi: 10.1111/echo.14136. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
9
Epidemiology of acute myocardial infarction in the Italian CCU network: the BLITZ study.意大利冠心病监护病房网络中急性心肌梗死的流行病学:闪电研究
Eur Heart J. 2003 Sep;24(18):1616-29. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00278-1.
10
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction along with Zwolle Risk Score for Risk Stratification to Enhance Safe and Early Discharge in STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Retrospective Observational Study.左心室射血分数联合兹沃勒风险评分用于风险分层以促进接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者安全早期出院:一项回顾性观察研究
Cureus. 2019 Jul 29;11(7):e5272. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5272.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes; clinical landscape, management strategy and in-hospital outcomes: an age perspective.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征:临床概况、管理策略及住院结局:年龄视角
Egypt Heart J. 2021 Mar 31;73(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s43044-021-00155-8.
2
Detection of Left Ventricular Thrombi on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Viability Studies.心脏磁共振心肌存活研究中左心室血栓的检测
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2020 Aug 17;32(3):368-376. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1042. eCollection 2020.
3
Early mobilization post-myocardial infarction: A scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Frailty in Acute Coronary Syndromes in the Elderly.衰弱在老年急性冠状动脉综合征中的作用。
Gerontology. 2018;64(5):422-429. doi: 10.1159/000488390. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
2
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
3
心肌梗死后早期活动:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 17;15(8):e0237866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237866. eCollection 2020.
Feasibility and safety of an early discharge strategy after low-risk acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the EDAMI pilot trial.
低风险急性心肌梗死患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后早期出院策略的可行性和安全性:EDAMI 试点试验
Cardiology. 2015;130(2):120-9. doi: 10.1159/000368890. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
4
Safety and health status following early discharge in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary PCI: a randomized trial.急性心肌梗死患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后早期出院的安全与健康状况:一项随机试验
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Nov;22(11):1427-34. doi: 10.1177/2047487314559276. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
5
Early discharge after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的早期出院。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2013 Sep;2(3):262-9. doi: 10.1177/2048872612475231.
6
Safety and feasibility of hospital discharge 2 days following primary percutaneous intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 2 天后出院的安全性和可行性。
Heart. 2012 Dec;98(23):1722-7. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302414. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
7
Relation of length of hospital stay in acute myocardial infarction to postdischarge mortality.急性心肌梗死患者住院时间与出院后死亡率的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Feb 15;101(4):428-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.09.090.
8
Intervention in acute coronary syndromes: do patients undergo intervention on the basis of their risk characteristics? The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE).急性冠状动脉综合征的干预治疗:患者是否根据其风险特征接受干预?全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究(GRACE)。
Heart. 2007 Feb;93(2):177-82. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.084830. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
9
Predictors of length of hospital stay after acute myocardial infarction in Japan.日本急性心肌梗死后住院时间的预测因素。
Circ J. 2004 Sep;68(9):809-15. doi: 10.1253/circj.68.809.
10
Prognostic assessment of patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty: implications for early discharge.接受直接血管成形术治疗的急性心肌梗死患者的预后评估:对早期出院的意义。
Circulation. 2004 Jun 8;109(22):2737-43. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000131765.73959.87. Epub 2004 May 24.