Suppr超能文献

非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征:临床概况、管理策略及住院结局:年龄视角

Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes; clinical landscape, management strategy and in-hospital outcomes: an age perspective.

作者信息

Dakhil Zainab Atiyah, Farhan Hasan Ali

机构信息

Al-Kindy College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

Scientific Council of Cardiology, Iraqi Board for Medical Specializations, Baghdad, Iraq.

出版信息

Egypt Heart J. 2021 Mar 31;73(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s43044-021-00155-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As the elderly represent a substantial proportion of medical care beneficiaries, and there is limited data about age disparity in emerging countries, this study sought to investigate the impact of age on the management in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS).

RESULTS

Two hundred patients with NSTE-ACS enrolled prospectively, patients' data, pharmacotherapy, management strategy as well timing to catheterization were documented. Patients grouped into ≥ 65 years versus < 65 years; 32.5% were ≥ 65-year-old. The older group presented as high GRACE risk (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) (67.7% versus 15.6%). Elderly patients were less likely to be referred for catheterization compared with younger counterparts (55.4% versus 76.3%, p = 0.003). Within low risk class patients, none of the elderly versus 9.33% of younger patients were catheterized within 2 h; in the same line, none of the elderly versus 16% of younger patients were catheterized within 24 h. Alternatively, at high risk class, 6.81% of the elderly and none of the younger patients were catheterized within 2 h. On the univariate analysis of variables to predict invasive strategy, presence of history of prior IHD, diabetes, absent in-hospital acute heart failure or atrial fibrillation/flutter, higher haemoglobin and lower creatinine levels predicted the use of invasive strategy, while on multivariate analysis, acute heart failure (95% CI - 0.38 to - 0.41, p = 0.01), lower haemoglobin (95% CI 0.002-0.07, p = 0.03), and atrial fibrillation/flutter (95% CI - 0.48 to - 0.02, p = 0.03) predicted conservative strategy. The elderly were more likely to have acute heart failure (32.3% versus 14.8%, p = 0.004), same as stroke (3.1% versus none, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Less-invasive strategy used in the elderly with NSTE-ACS compared with younger counterparts, yet age was not a predictor of catheterization underuse on multivariate analysis. It is crucial to bridge the age gap in the healthcare system in setting of ACS management by grasping the attention of decision makers and emphasizing on the adherence of healthcare providers to the guidelines to improve cardiovascular care and outcomes.

摘要

背景

由于老年人在医疗保健受益人群中占相当大的比例,且新兴国家关于年龄差异的数据有限,本研究旨在调查年龄对非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者管理的影响。

结果

前瞻性纳入200例NSTE-ACS患者,记录患者数据、药物治疗、管理策略以及导管插入术时机。患者分为≥65岁组和<65岁组;32.5%为≥65岁。老年组表现为高GRACE风险(急性冠状动脉事件全球注册)(67.7%对15.6%)。与年轻患者相比,老年患者接受导管插入术的可能性较小(55.4%对76.3%,p = 0.003)。在低风险组患者中,老年患者在2小时内无人接受导管插入术,而年轻患者中有9.33%接受了;同样,老年患者在24小时内无人接受导管插入术,而年轻患者中有16%接受了。相反,在高风险组中,6.81%的老年患者在2小时内接受了导管插入术,而年轻患者无人接受。在预测侵入性策略的变量单因素分析中,既往缺血性心脏病史、糖尿病、无院内急性心力衰竭或心房颤动/扑动、较高的血红蛋白水平和较低的肌酐水平可预测侵入性策略的使用,而在多因素分析中,急性心力衰竭(95%CI - 0.38至 - 0.41,p = 0.01)、较低的血红蛋白水平(95%CI 0.002 - 0.07,p = 0.03)和心房颤动/扑动(95%CI - 0.48至 - 0.02,p = 0.03)可预测保守策略。老年患者更易发生急性心力衰竭(32.3%对14.8%,p = 0.004),中风情况也类似(3.1%对无,p = 0.04)。

结论

与年轻患者相比,老年NSTE-ACS患者采用的侵入性策略较少,但在多因素分析中,年龄并非导管插入术使用不足的预测因素。通过引起决策者的关注并强调医疗服务提供者遵守指南,以缩小医疗保健系统中急性冠状动脉综合征管理方面的年龄差距,对于改善心血管护理及预后至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aa6/8012438/7e54858ff4f0/43044_2021_155_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验