• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定前脑岛在快速适应中的功能

Formalizing the Function of Anterior Insula in Rapid Adaptation.

作者信息

Bossaerts Peter

机构信息

Department of Finance, Faculty of Business and Economics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Integr Neurosci. 2018 Dec 4;12:61. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2018.00061. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fnint.2018.00061
PMID:30568581
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6290341/
Abstract

Anterior insula (aIns) is thought to play a crucial role in rapid adaptation in an ever-changing environment. Mathematically, it is known to track risk and surprise. Modern theories of learning, however, assign a dominant role to prediction errors (PEs), not to risk and surprise. Risk and surprise only enter to the extent that they modulate the learning rate, in an attempt to approximate Bayesian learning. Even without such modulation, adaptation is still possible, albeit slow. Here, I propose a new theory of learning, reference-model based learning (RMBL), where risk and surprise are central, and PEs play a secondary, though still crucial, role. The primary goal is to bring outcomes in line with expectations in the reference model (RM). Learning is modulated by how large the PEs are relative to model anticipation, i.e., to surprise as defined by the RM. In a target location prediction task where participants were continuously required to adapt, choices appeared to be closer with to RMBL predictions than to Bayesian learning. aIns reaction to surprise was more acute in the more difficult treatment, consistent with its hypothesized role in metacognition. I discuss links with related theories, such as Active Inference, Actor-Critic Models and Reference-Model Based Adaptive Control.

摘要

前脑岛(aIns)被认为在不断变化的环境中快速适应方面起着关键作用。从数学角度来看,它能够追踪风险和意外情况。然而,现代学习理论将主要作用赋予了预测误差(PEs),而非风险和意外情况。风险和意外情况仅在它们调节学习率的程度上起作用,试图近似贝叶斯学习。即使没有这种调节,适应仍然是可能的,尽管会很缓慢。在此,我提出一种新的学习理论,即基于参考模型的学习(RMBL),其中风险和意外情况是核心,而预测误差起着次要但仍然至关重要的作用。主要目标是使结果与参考模型(RM)中的预期相符。学习是由预测误差相对于模型预期的大小来调节的,即相对于参考模型所定义的意外情况。在一个参与者被持续要求适应的目标位置预测任务中,选择似乎更接近基于参考模型的学习预测,而非贝叶斯学习。在前脑岛对意外情况的反应在更困难的处理中更为敏锐,这与其在元认知中假设的作用一致。我讨论了与相关理论的联系,如主动推理、演员 - 评论家模型和基于参考模型的自适应控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972d/6290341/0b385856416b/fnint-12-00061-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972d/6290341/39a78c6d3970/fnint-12-00061-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972d/6290341/e663679c24e9/fnint-12-00061-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972d/6290341/4c0f47bc9b6d/fnint-12-00061-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972d/6290341/0b385856416b/fnint-12-00061-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972d/6290341/39a78c6d3970/fnint-12-00061-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972d/6290341/e663679c24e9/fnint-12-00061-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972d/6290341/4c0f47bc9b6d/fnint-12-00061-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/972d/6290341/0b385856416b/fnint-12-00061-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Formalizing the Function of Anterior Insula in Rapid Adaptation.确定前脑岛在快速适应中的功能
Front Integr Neurosci. 2018 Dec 4;12:61. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2018.00061. eCollection 2018.
2
Brain signals of a Surprise-Actor-Critic model: Evidence for multiple learning modules in human decision making.惊奇行动者-评论家模型的脑信号:人类决策中多个学习模块的证据。
Neuroimage. 2022 Feb 1;246:118780. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118780. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
3
Temporal prediction errors modulate cingulate-insular coupling.时间预测误差调节扣带回-脑岛耦合。
Neuroimage. 2013 May 1;71:147-57. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.078. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
4
Brain dynamics for confidence-weighted learning.脑动力学与置信权重学习。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Jun 2;16(6):e1007935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007935. eCollection 2020 Jun.
5
Surprise About Sensory Event Timing Drives Cortical Transients in the Beta Frequency Band.感官事件时间的意外变化会引发皮质中β频带的瞬态反应。
J Neurosci. 2018 Aug 29;38(35):7600-7610. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0307-18.2018. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
6
Learning From Surprise: Harnessing a Metacognitive Surprise Signal to Build and Adapt Belief Networks.从意外中学习:利用元认知意外信号构建和适应信念网络。
Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan;11(1):164-177. doi: 10.1111/tops.12397. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
7
The feedback-related negativity (FRN) revisited: new insights into the localization, meaning and network organization.重新审视反馈相关负波(FRN):对其定位、意义及网络组织的新见解
Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:159-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.028. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
8
Learning in Volatile Environments With the Bayes Factor Surprise.贝叶斯因子惊喜在多变环境中的学习
Neural Comput. 2021 Feb;33(2):269-340. doi: 10.1162/neco_a_01352. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
9
Task-evoked pupillary responses track precision-weighted prediction errors and learning rate during interceptive visuomotor actions.任务诱发的瞳孔反应在拦截性视动动作期间跟踪精确加权预测误差和学习率。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 21;12(1):22098. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26544-w.
10
Surprise Acts as a Reducer of Outcome Value in Human Reinforcement Learning.惊喜在人类强化学习中作为结果价值的一种消减因素。
Front Neurosci. 2020 Sep 8;14:852. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00852. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
The neural dynamics associated with computational complexity.与计算复杂性相关的神经动力学。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Sep 23;20(9):e1012447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012447. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Ecstatic or Mystical Experience through Epilepsy.癫痫引发的狂喜或神秘体验。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Sep 1;35(9):1372-1381. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02031.
3
A New Explanation for the Frog-in-the-Pan Phenomenon Based on the Cognitive-Evolutionary Model of Surprise.基于惊奇认知进化模型对“温水煮青蛙”现象的新解释

本文引用的文献

1
Separate neural representations of prediction error valence and surprise: Evidence from an fMRI meta-analysis.预测误差效价和惊喜的独立神经表示:来自 fMRI 元分析的证据。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Jul;39(7):2887-2906. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24047. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
2
Spatiotemporal neural characterization of prediction error valence and surprise during reward learning in humans.人类在奖励学习过程中预测误差效价和惊喜的时空神经特征。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 6;7(1):4762. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04507-w.
3
Neural Mechanisms Behind Identification of Leptokurtic Noise and Adaptive Behavioral Response.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Dec 22;13(1):7. doi: 10.3390/bs13010007.
4
Insular Stimulation Produces Mental Clarity and Bliss.脑岛刺激产生清晰和愉悦的精神状态。
Ann Neurol. 2022 Feb;91(2):289-292. doi: 10.1002/ana.26282. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
5
Epilepsy and Ecstatic Experiences: The Role of the Insula.癫痫与狂喜体验:脑岛的作用
Brain Sci. 2021 Oct 22;11(11):1384. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111384.
6
Continuous decisions.连续决策。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Mar;376(1819):20190664. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0664. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
尖峰噪声识别与适应性行为反应背后的神经机制
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Apr;26(4):1818-1830. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw013. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
4
Functionally dissociable influences on learning rate in a dynamic environment.在动态环境中对学习速率的功能可分离影响。
Neuron. 2014 Nov 19;84(4):870-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.013.
5
The neural representation of unexpected uncertainty during value-based decision making.基于价值的决策过程中意外不确定性的神经表示。
Neuron. 2013 Jul 10;79(1):191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.04.037.
6
Active inference and agency: optimal control without cost functions.主动推理与能动性:无成本函数的最优控制
Biol Cybern. 2012 Oct;106(8-9):523-41. doi: 10.1007/s00422-012-0512-8. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
7
The neural basis of metacognitive ability.元认知能力的神经基础。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 May 19;367(1594):1338-49. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0417.
8
Right hemisphere brain damage impairs strategy updating.右侧大脑半球损伤会损害策略更新。
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Dec;22(12):2745-60. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr351. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
9
Significance of the insula for the evolution of human awareness of feelings from the body.脑岛对于人类从身体感受进化到意识感受的重要性。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Apr;1225:72-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05990.x.
10
An approximately Bayesian delta-rule model explains the dynamics of belief updating in a changing environment.一个近似贝叶斯德尔塔规则模型解释了在不断变化的环境中信念更新的动态。
J Neurosci. 2010 Sep 15;30(37):12366-78. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0822-10.2010.