Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, Republic of Korea, 16419.
Department of Neuroscience, Center for Neuroengineering, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Mar;376(1819):20190664. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0664. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
Humans and other animals evolved to make decisions that extend over time with continuous and ever-changing options. Nonetheless, the academic study of decision-making is mostly limited to the simple case of choice between two options. Here, we advocate that the study of choice should expand to include . Continuous decisions, by our definition, involve a continuum of possible responses and take place over an extended period of time during which the response is continuously subject to modification. In most continuous decisions, the range of options can fluctuate and is affected by recent responses, making consideration of reciprocal feedback between choices and the environment essential. The study of continuous decisions raises new questions, such as how abstract processes of valuation and comparison are co-implemented with action planning and execution, how we simulate the large number of possible futures our choices lead to, and how our brains employ hierarchical structure to make choices more efficiently. While microeconomic theory has proven invaluable for discrete decisions, we propose that engineering control theory may serve as a better foundation for continuous ones. And while the concept of value has proven foundational for discrete decisions, goal states and policies may prove more useful for continuous ones. This article is part of the theme issue 'Existence and prevalence of economic behaviours among non-human primates'.
人类和其他动物进化到能够做出长期的、具有连续性和不断变化的选择的决策。尽管如此,决策的学术研究大多局限于两种选择之间的简单选择情况。在这里,我们主张选择的研究应该扩展到包括连续决策。根据我们的定义,连续决策涉及一系列可能的反应,并在一段时间内持续进行,在此期间,反应不断受到修改。在大多数连续决策中,选项范围可能会波动,并受到最近反应的影响,因此必须考虑选择和环境之间的相互反馈。连续决策的研究提出了新的问题,例如如何将估值和比较的抽象过程与行动计划和执行结合起来,如何模拟我们的选择所导致的大量可能未来,以及我们的大脑如何利用分层结构来更有效地做出选择。虽然微观经济学理论已被证明对离散决策非常有价值,但我们提出,工程控制理论可能是连续决策更好的基础。而且,虽然价值概念已被证明对离散决策具有基础性,但目标状态和策略可能对连续决策更有用。本文是主题为“非人类灵长类动物中存在和普遍存在的经济行为”的一部分。