• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全髋关节置换术——50 岁以下患者失败的原因?

Total hip replacement-the cause of failure in patients under 50 years old?

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Aug;188(3):879-883. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-01956-8. Epub 2018 Dec 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-018-01956-8
PMID:30569374
Abstract

AIM

To establish the mode of failure of primary total hip replacement in patients under 50 years old.

METHODS

A total of 1062 revision total hip arthroplasties were performed over a 5-year period, with 146 on patients under 50 years old. These were subdivided into early (< 5 years) and late (> 5 years) failures from the index procedure.

RESULTS

The commonest mechanism of failure was aseptic loosening (42.3%) followed by metal-on-metal failure (15.8%), infection (14.4%) and instability (9.6%). The commonest cause of early revision surgery was due to metal-on-metal failure (27.8%) followed by aseptic loosening (19.7%) and infection (18.4%). In the late revision group, the main cause of failure was aseptic loosening (64%) and infection (10.7%).

CONCLUSION

The changing trend of early revision due to metal-on-metal failure is important to recognise. Continuous review of the mechanism of primary total hip replacement failure is necessary to ensure the best patient outcome and maximise implant survivorship.

摘要

目的

确定 50 岁以下初次全髋关节置换失败的模式。

方法

在 5 年期间共进行了 1062 例翻修全髋关节置换术,其中 146 例患者年龄在 50 岁以下。这些患者根据索引手术分为早期(<5 年)和晚期(>5 年)失败。

结果

最常见的失败机制是无菌性松动(42.3%),其次是金属对金属失败(15.8%)、感染(14.4%)和不稳定(9.6%)。早期翻修手术的常见原因是金属对金属失败(27.8%),其次是无菌性松动(19.7%)和感染(18.4%)。在晚期翻修组中,失败的主要原因是无菌性松动(64%)和感染(10.7%)。

结论

认识到金属对金属失败导致早期翻修的变化趋势很重要。需要不断审查初次全髋关节置换失败的机制,以确保患者获得最佳结果并最大限度地提高植入物存活率。

相似文献

1
Total hip replacement-the cause of failure in patients under 50 years old?全髋关节置换术——50 岁以下患者失败的原因?
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Aug;188(3):879-883. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-01956-8. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
2
Early failures in total hip arthroplasty -- a changing paradigm.全髋关节置换术的早期失败——范式转变。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun;29(6):1285-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.024. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
3
Trabecular Metal Versus Non-Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components and the Risk of Re-Revision Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.网眼金属与非网眼金属髋臼部件在翻修全髋关节置换术后再次翻修风险方面的比较:来自英国国家关节注册处的一项倾向评分匹配研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Jul 5;100(13):1132-1140. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00718.
4
Revision total hip arthroplasty in younger patients: indications, reasons for failure, and survivorship.年轻患者的全髋关节翻修术:适应证、失败原因和生存率。
Phys Sportsmed. 2012 Nov;40(4):96-101. doi: 10.3810/psm.2012.11.1992.
5
Midterm Outcomes of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With the Use of a Multihole Highly-Porous Titanium Shell.使用多孔高孔隙率钛金属杯进行翻修全髋关节置换术的中期结果
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2806-2809. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.065. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
6
Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: A 62 case series at a minimum 5 years' follow-up.采用金属加强固定的双动髋臼杯进行全髋关节置换翻修术:62例病例系列,至少随访5年。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Sep;103(5):679-684. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 May 31.
7
Survival of hydroxyapatite-coated cups: acetabular screws involve a lower rate of revision surgery due to aseptic loosening.羟基磷灰石涂层髋臼杯的生存率:由于无菌性松动,髋臼螺钉翻修手术的发生率较低。
Hip Int. 2017 Mar 31;27(2):153-161. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000435. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
8
Outcomes of Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients.全髋关节置换术患者中双动髋臼杯的治疗效果
Surg Technol Int. 2019 May 15;34:367-370.
9
Early Failure of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is Surgical Approach a Risk Factor?初次全髋关节置换术早期失败:手术入路是危险因素吗?
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jun;33(6):1780-1785. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
10
[Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].[髋关节假体固定类型及患者年龄对全髋关节置换中期翻修率的影响]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018;85(1):46-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements in Biomedical Sensors for Early Detection of Failure in Hip and Knee Implants: Scoping Review on Potential Sensors for Implant Integration.用于早期检测髋关节和膝关节植入物失效的生物医学传感器进展:植入物集成潜在传感器的综述
Ann Biomed Eng. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s10439-025-03780-5.
2
Enhanced bone cement for fixation of prosthetic joint utilizing nanoparticles.利用纳米颗粒的用于假体关节固定的增强型骨水泥。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2025 Jan 13;36(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s10856-024-06848-1.
3
Efficacy and safety of continuous nursing in improving functional recovery after total hip or knee arthroplasty in older adults: A systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today--has anything changed after 10 years?为什么如今全膝关节置换术会失败——10年后有什么变化吗?
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep;29(9):1774-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.07.024. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
2
Early failures in total hip arthroplasty -- a changing paradigm.全髋关节置换术的早期失败——范式转变。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun;29(6):1285-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.024. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
3
What are the causes for failures of primary hip arthroplasties in France?法国初次髋关节置换术失败的原因是什么?
连续性护理对改善老年人全髋关节或膝关节置换术后功能恢复的疗效及安全性:一项系统评价
Int J Nurs Sci. 2024 Mar 11;11(2):286-294. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.03.013. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Effect of using nano-particles of magnesium oxide and titanium dioxide to enhance physical and mechanical properties of hip joint bone cement.使用氧化镁和二氧化钛纳米颗粒增强髋关节骨水泥物理和力学性能的效果。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 3;14(1):2838. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53084-2.
5
Overstretching Expectations May Endanger the Success of the "Millennium Surgery".过度扩张期望可能危及“千年手术”的成功。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Feb 14;10:789629. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.789629. eCollection 2022.
6
Effects of continuous nursing based on WeChat platform on the functional recovery and quality of life in elderly patients after total hip arthroplasty.基于微信平台的延续性护理对老年全髋关节置换术后患者功能恢复及生活质量的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2021 May 15;13(5):5623-5628. eCollection 2021.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Dec;471(12):3863-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2935-5.
4
Chronic infections in hip arthroplasties: comparing risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.髋关节置换术后的慢性感染:比较一期和二期翻修后再次感染的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4:57-73. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S29025. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
5
Improved results of primary total hip replacement.初次全髋关节置换术的改良效果。
Acta Orthop. 2010 Dec;81(6):649-59. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.537807.
6
A monoblock porous tantalum acetabular cup has no osteolysis on CT at 10 years.10 年 CT 随访未见单块多孔钽髋臼杯骨溶解。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):382-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1500-8.
7
The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States.美国翻修全髋关节置换术的流行病学
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jan;91(1):128-33. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00155.
8
One stage uncemented revision of infected total hip replacement using cancellous allograft bone impregnated with antibiotics.使用浸渍抗生素的同种异体松质骨对感染性全髋关节置换进行一期非骨水泥翻修。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Dec;90(12):1580-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B12.20742.
9
Total hip arthroplasties: what are the reasons for revision?全髋关节置换术:翻修的原因有哪些?
Int Orthop. 2008 Oct;32(5):597-604. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0364-3. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
10
Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.芬兰关节置换登记处中年轻患者原发性骨关节炎的全髋关节置换术。4661例初次置换,随访0至22年。
Acta Orthop. 2005 Feb;76(1):28-41. doi: 10.1080/00016470510030292.