Noordhuis P H Helene, Jutte Paul C, Kottapalli Ajay G P, Lamoth Claudine J C, Roossien C C Charissa
Department of Human Movement Science, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ann Biomed Eng. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s10439-025-03780-5.
Despite significant advancements in hip and knee joint implant technology, 6.4% of implants fail within the first ten years due to aseptic loosening, instability, and/or infection. Implants equipped with sensors show promise in early failure detection, enabling early and reduced intervention. This scoping review aims to provide an overview of biomedical sensors and their potential for integration into hip- and knee implants.
A comprehensive search of databases PubMed and Embase was performed. Inclusion criteria were sensors to detect failure causes infection, inflammation, loosening or wear; developed for biomedical applications; ex vivo, in vivo and/or in vitro studies. The sensors were analysed based on criteria per sensor characteristics (e.g. accuracy, durability, response time) relevant for implant integration.
49 articles were included presenting 52 sensors: 24 pressure and force, 6 strain, 15 acidity, 4 temperature, and 3 bacterial detection (3 dual sensing elements). Among these, three sensors were specifically designed for hip- and knee implants. The remaining 46 were developed for other biomedical applications. Our analysis identified two strain and seven acidity sensors that met the criteria for detecting hip- and knee implant failure. Two bacteria sensors showed potential for short-term use post-implantation, aligning with the critical period for periprosthetic infection, but the reporting frequency was too low to draw proper conclusions. No wear (particle) sensor was found.
We found a significant gap in sensors that can detect wear particles. Future work on continuous implant monitoring should focus on reducing risk and the enhancement of sensor durability and longevity.
尽管髋关节和膝关节植入技术取得了重大进展,但由于无菌性松动、不稳定和/或感染,6.4%的植入物在头十年内失效。配备传感器的植入物在早期故障检测方面显示出前景,能够实现早期干预并减少干预措施。本综述旨在概述生物医学传感器及其集成到髋关节和膝关节植入物中的潜力。
对PubMed和Embase数据库进行了全面检索。纳入标准为用于检测感染、炎症、松动或磨损等故障原因的传感器;为生物医学应用开发;体外、体内和/或体外研究。根据与植入物集成相关的每个传感器特性标准(如准确性、耐用性、响应时间)对传感器进行分析。
纳入49篇文章,介绍了52种传感器:24种压力和力传感器;6种应变传感器;15种酸度传感器;4种温度传感器;3种细菌检测传感器(3种具有双传感元件)。其中,三种传感器是专门为髋关节和膝关节植入物设计的。其余46种是为其他生物医学应用开发的。我们的分析确定了两种符合检测髋关节和膝关节植入物故障标准的应变传感器和七种酸度传感器。两种细菌传感器在植入后短期使用方面显示出潜力,这与假体周围感染的关键时期相符,但报告频率过低,无法得出恰当结论。未发现磨损(颗粒)传感器。
我们发现能够检测磨损颗粒的传感器存在重大差距。未来关于植入物连续监测的工作应集中在降低风险以及提高传感器的耐用性和使用寿命上。