Curby Kim M, Huang Mengjie, Moerel Denise
Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Centre for Elite Performance, Expertise and Training, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Apr;81(3):716-726. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-01643-x.
Holistic processing is often considered to be limited to faces and non-face objects of expertise, with previous studies revealing a specific mechanistic overlap between the holistic processing of these stimuli. However, more recently holistic processing has been demonstrated for untrained, novel stimuli containing salient Gestalt perceptual grouping cues. The relationship between the holistic processing of these novel stimuli and of faces is unclear. Here we examine whether there is a mechanistic overlap between the holistic processing of these two stimulus categories. To do this we used the same two-back interleaved part-matching task previously used to examine the mechanistic overlap between the processing of faces and of objects of expertise. Concurrent holistic processing of these salient Gestalt stimuli did not impact (Experiment 1), nor was it impacted by (Experiment 2), holistic processing of face stimuli. This suggests that the nature of the overlap between holistic processing of faces and of salient Gestalt stimuli may be distinct from that between objects of expertise and faces. We discuss potential mechanistic accounts of this difference.
整体加工通常被认为局限于面孔和专业领域的非面孔物体,先前的研究揭示了这些刺激的整体加工之间存在特定的机制重叠。然而,最近已证明,对于包含显著格式塔知觉分组线索的未经训练的新异刺激,也存在整体加工。这些新异刺激与面孔的整体加工之间的关系尚不清楚。在这里,我们研究这两类刺激的整体加工之间是否存在机制重叠。为此,我们使用了之前用于检验面孔加工与专业领域物体加工之间机制重叠的相同的双后交错部分匹配任务。这些显著格式塔刺激的同时整体加工既不影响面孔刺激的整体加工(实验1),也不受其影响(实验2)。这表明,面孔与显著格式塔刺激的整体加工之间的重叠性质可能不同于专业领域物体与面孔之间的重叠性质。我们讨论了这种差异的潜在机制解释。