Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Apr;36(2):448-61. doi: 10.1037/a0016471.
Faces and objects of expertise compete for early perceptual processes and holistic processing resources (Gauthier, Curran, Curby, & Collins, 2003). Here, we examined the nature of interference on holistic face processing in working memory by comparing how various types of loads affect selective attention to parts of face composites. In dual tasks, all loads impaired overall performance on face judgment compared with no load. However, a face load reduced holistic face processing (Experiment 1) whereas an object load did not, regardless of expertise (Experiments 2 and 3). Also, 2 types of faces produced asymmetrical interference on each other (Experiment 4), refuting the hypothesis that any faces would produce equal interference. Thus, the interference on holistic face processing in working memory does not depend on overlap in expertise or face processing, but may be modulated by limitations in encoding or maintenance of highly similar representations.
专长面孔和专长物体在早期知觉加工和整体加工资源上存在竞争(Gauthier、Curran、Curby 和 Collins,2003)。在这里,我们通过比较不同类型的负载如何影响对面部复合的部分的选择性注意,来研究工作记忆中整体面部加工的干扰性质。在双重任务中,与无负载相比,所有负载都会损害面孔判断的整体表现。然而,面孔负载会降低整体面孔加工(实验 1),而物体负载不会,无论专长如何(实验 2 和 3)。此外,2 种类型的面孔彼此之间产生了不对称的干扰(实验 4),反驳了任何面孔都会产生同等干扰的假设。因此,工作记忆中整体面孔加工的干扰不依赖于专长或面孔加工的重叠,而是可能受到高度相似表示的编码或保持限制的调节。