Weiss C M
J Dent Educ. 1988 Dec;52(12):706-11.
Comparison of data from independent clinical trials conducted on both the Oratronics standard blade implant and the Nobelpharma fixture device provides evidence that the fibro-osteal and osteal modes of tissue integration are both effective, and lead to comparable implant success/survival rates. Advantages, disadvantages, and areas of preferred use and overlap for each implant system are discussed. Data from the VA Cooperative Study, comparing the efficacy of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) supported by a blade implant to removable partial dentures (RPDs), and from the NIDR/Harvard Study, comparing the efficacy of FPDs supported by a blade implant to cantilevered FPDs, indicate that the success/survival rates of FPDs supported by blade implant are equivalent to or better than those for conventional treatment modalities. Data presented in this paper establish the safety and efficacy of use of fibro-osteal integrated blade devices in implant dentistry.
对Oratronics标准叶片种植体和Nobelpharma固定装置进行的独立临床试验数据比较表明，纤维骨结合和骨结合的组织整合模式均有效，并导致相当的种植体成功率/存留率。文中讨论了每种种植系统的优缺点、首选使用领域和重叠领域。来自退伍军人事务部合作研究（比较叶片种植体支持的固定局部义齿与可摘局部义齿的疗效）以及来自国家牙科研究所/哈佛研究（比较叶片种植体支持的固定局部义齿与悬臂式固定局部义齿的疗效）的数据表明，叶片种植体支持的固定局部义齿的成功率/存留率等同于或优于传统治疗方式。本文提供的数据证实了纤维骨结合叶片装置在种植牙科学中使用的安全性和有效性。
