Kapur K K, Garrett N R
Dental Service, VA Medical Center, Sepulveda, CA 91343.
J Dent Educ. 1988 Dec;52(12):760-4.
Significant progress and valuable contributions have been made by pioneers in the field of dental implantology during the past 20 years. The feasibility of clinical application of dental implants for specific prosthodontic conditions has been demonstrated by several reports based upon retrospective data or surveys of clinical experiences. However, there is a lack of reliable scientific information to determine the clinical efficacy of implant-supported prostheses or the physiological merits of the two types of implant-bone interface. Similarly, there are no known studies that have tested the relative efficacy of different implant systems. The claims of success rates for different implants can only be substantiated when controlled, independent studies are made, following research protocols that meet the requirements of clinical trials in terms of delineation of hypothesis, definition of treatment, entry and treatment allocations, exclusions and withdrawals, sample size, and a coordinated plan for the statistical analysis of data and interpretation of results. The study design of the VA Cooperative Study has followed the essential requirements of clinical trials in comparing the efficacies of the two treatment modalities--traditional removable partial dentures versus fixed partial dentures supported by implants.
在过去20年里,牙种植学领域的先驱者们取得了重大进展并做出了宝贵贡献。基于回顾性数据或临床经验调查的几份报告已证明了牙种植体在特定修复条件下临床应用的可行性。然而,缺乏可靠的科学信息来确定种植体支持修复体的临床疗效或两种种植体-骨界面的生理优点。同样,也没有已知的研究测试过不同种植系统的相对疗效。只有在按照符合临床试验要求的研究方案进行对照、独立研究后,不同种植体成功率的说法才能得到证实,这些要求包括假设的界定、治疗的定义、入组和治疗分配、排除和退出、样本量以及数据统计分析和结果解释的协调计划。退伍军人事务部合作研究的研究设计在比较两种治疗方式——传统可摘局部义齿与种植体支持的固定局部义齿的疗效时,遵循了临床试验的基本要求。