a National Training Academy , The Professional Golfers' Association , Ping House, The Belfry , UK.
b Institute for Sport and Physical Activity Research , University of Bedfordshire , Bedford , UK.
J Sports Sci. 2019 Jun;37(12):1381-1386. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1559972. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
A number of field-based investigations have evidenced practically significant relationships between clubhead velocity (CHV), vertical jump performance and maximum strength. Unfortunately, whilst these investigations provide a great deal of external validity, they are unable to ascertain vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) variables that may relate to golfers' CHVs. This investigation aimed to assess if the variance in European Challenge Tour golfers' CHVs could be predicted by countermovement jump (CMJ) positive impulse (PI), isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) peak force (PF) and rate of force development (RFD) from 0-50 ms, 0-100 ms, 0-150 ms and 0-200 ms. Thirty-one elite level European Challenge Tour golfers performed a CMJ and IMTP on dual force plates at a tournament venue, with CHV measured on a driving range. Hierarchical multiple regression results indicated that the variance in CHV was significantly predicted by all four models (model one R = 0.379; model two R = 0.392, model three R = 0.422, model four R = 0.480), with Akaike's information criterion indicating that model one was the best fit. Individual standardised beta coefficients revealed that CMJ PI was the only significant variable, accounting for 37.9% of the variance in European Challenge Tour Golfers' CHVs.
一些基于现场的调查已经证明,球杆头速度(CHV)、垂直跳跃表现和最大力量之间存在着实际的显著关系。不幸的是,虽然这些调查提供了大量的外部有效性,但它们无法确定与高尔夫球手 CHV 相关的垂直地面反作用力(vGRF)变量。本研究旨在评估欧洲挑战赛巡回赛高尔夫球手 CHV 的变化是否可以通过反跳(CMJ)正冲量(PI)、等长大腿中部拉力(IMTP)峰值力(PF)和 0-50ms、0-100ms、0-150ms 和 0-200ms 的力发展速率(RFD)来预测。31 名欧洲挑战赛巡回赛的精英高尔夫球手在一个锦标赛场地的双力板上进行了 CMJ 和 IMTP 测试,同时在一个球场上测量了 CHV。分层多元回归结果表明,所有四个模型(模型一 R=0.379;模型二 R=0.392,模型三 R=0.422,模型四 R=0.480)都能显著预测 CHV 的变化,Akaike 信息量准则表明模型一是最佳拟合。个体标准化贝塔系数显示,CMJ PI 是唯一显著的变量,占欧洲挑战赛巡回赛高尔夫球手 CHV 变化的 37.9%。