Suppr超能文献

跨常用仪器评估患者报告的性和尿失禁结局的换算表的制定和验证。

Development and Validation of Crosswalks for Patient-reported Sexual and Urinary Outcomes Between Commonly Used Instruments.

机构信息

Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):723-730. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become widely adopted in the care of patients with prostate cancer, but there is no validated crosswalk between two commonly used instruments, the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form (EPIC-26) and the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) instrument, which consists of the International Index of Erectile Function-6 (IIEF-6) questionnaire and the MSK radical prostatectomy urinary outcome scale.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate bidirectional crosswalks between the sexual and urinary domains (single domain in MSK, separate incontinence and irritative/obstructive domains in EPIC-26) of the MSK and EPIC-26 instruments.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Radical prostatectomy (RP) patients completing instruments at MSK and Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) between January and May of 2017 were invited to enroll. Stratified random sampling (by institution, MSK urinary function score, and MSK erectile function score) was used to divide patient data into training and test sets. Models were developed to predict the domain score for each instrument using the other's item responses and domain scores. Performance was evaluated using capped root-mean-squared error and accuracy at established thresholds.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

We received 517 instruments at MSK and 1033 within MUSIC, which were assigned to training (825), post-RP test (412), and pre-RP test (313) sets. We found the crosswalks to have low error and high accuracy. Although the crosswalks are more accurate if responses to each item are known, it is possible to convert between instruments on the basis of a total domain score.

CONCLUSIONS

The crosswalks are a valid way to convert between sexual and urinary domains of the MSK and EPIC-26 instruments.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We developed and validated a set of formulas that allow conversion of sexual and urinary function scores between the Memorial Sloan Kettering and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form patient-reported outcome questionnaires. These crosswalks allow seamless transition between the two questionnaires.

摘要

背景

患者报告的结局测量(PROMs)已广泛应用于前列腺癌患者的治疗中,但在两种常用工具之间没有经过验证的转换途径,这两种工具分别是扩展前列腺癌指数综合简表(EPIC-26)和纪念斯隆凯特琳(MSK)工具,后者由国际勃起功能指数-6(IIEF-6)问卷和 MSK 根治性前列腺切除术尿功能量表组成。

目的

开发并验证 MSK 和 EPIC-26 工具的性和尿域(MSK 为单一域,EPIC-26 为单独的尿失禁和刺激/梗阻域)之间的双向转换途径。

设计、设置和参与者:2017 年 1 月至 5 月,在 MSK 和密歇根泌尿外科学术改进合作组织(MUSIC)完成工具的根治性前列腺切除术(RP)患者受邀参加研究。采用分层随机抽样(按机构、MSK 尿功能评分和 MSK 勃起功能评分)将患者数据分为训练集和测试集。使用其他工具的项目反应和域评分来开发预测每个工具域评分的模型。通过设定的均方根误差上限和准确度来评估性能。

结果和局限性

我们在 MSK 收到了 517 份工具,在 MUSIC 收到了 1033 份工具,它们被分配到训练(825 份)、RP 后测试(412 份)和 RP 前测试(313 份)组。我们发现转换途径的误差较低,准确性较高。虽然如果知道每个项目的反应,转换途径会更准确,但基于总分域评分也可以在工具之间进行转换。

结论

转换途径是在 MSK 和 EPIC-26 工具的性和尿域之间进行转换的有效方法。

患者总结

我们开发并验证了一套公式,允许在纪念斯隆凯特琳和扩展前列腺癌指数综合简表患者报告的结局问卷之间转换性功能和尿功能评分。这些转换途径允许在这两种问卷之间无缝过渡。

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of Crosswalks for Patient-reported Sexual and Urinary Outcomes Between Commonly Used Instruments.
Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):723-730. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
4
Interpreting Patient Reported Urinary and Sexual Function Outcomes across Multiple Validated Instruments.
J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):671-677. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.121. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
9
Caution with Use of the EPIC-50 Urinary Bother Scale: How Voiding Dysfunction Modifies its Performance.
J Urol. 2017 Dec;198(6):1397-1403. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.041. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
10
The Relationship and Psychosocial Impact of Arousal Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy.
J Sex Med. 2020 Jan;17(1):94-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.09.001. Epub 2019 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
An Overview of Patient-reported Outcomes for Men with Prostate Cancer: Results from the PIONEER Consortium.
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Dec 17;71:106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.11.009. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Impact of the time interval between biopsy and radical prostatectomy on functional outcomes.
World J Urol. 2024 Nov 16;42(1):640. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05324-3.
4
[The interoperability of IIEF-5 with EPIC-26 : Sexual function after radical prostatectomy].
Urologie. 2023 Jun;62(6):602-608. doi: 10.1007/s00120-023-02027-2. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
6
Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures into health care for men with localized prostate cancer.
Nat Rev Urol. 2022 May;19(5):263-279. doi: 10.1038/s41585-022-00575-4. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
7
Preoperative Prostate MRI Predictors of Urinary Continence Following Radical Prostatectomy.
Radiology. 2022 Apr;303(1):99-109. doi: 10.1148/radiol.210500. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
8
Measuring Quality of Life Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Jun 23;15:1373-1382. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S271447. eCollection 2021.
10
Updating the International Index of Erectile Function: Evaluation of a Large Clinical Data Set.
J Sex Med. 2020 Jan;17(1):126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.10.020. Epub 2019 Dec 5.

本文引用的文献

9
Interpreting Patient Reported Urinary and Sexual Function Outcomes across Multiple Validated Instruments.
J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):671-677. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.121. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验