Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering Discipline, School of Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, 47500 Bandar Sunway, Malaysia. School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, United States of America.
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Jan 31;64(3):035016. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aafabd.
Historically, breast cancer risk prediction models are based on mammographic density measures, which are dichotomous in nature and generally categorize each voxel or area of the breast parenchyma as 'dense' or 'not dense'. Using these conventional methods, the structural patterns or textural components of the breast tissue elements are not considered or ignored entirely. This study presents a novel method to predict breast cancer risk that combines new texture and mammographic density based image features. We performed a comprehensive study of the correlation of 944 new and conventional texture and mammographic density features with breast cancer risk on a cohort of Asian women. We studied 250 breast cancer cases and 250 controls matched at full-field digital mammography (FFDM) status for age, BMI and ethnicity. Stepwise regression analysis identified relevant features to be included in a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier model, trained and tested using a leave-one-out based cross-validation method. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were used as the two performance assessment indices in our study. For the LDA trained classifier, the adjusted OR was 6.15 (95% confidence interval: 3.55-10.64) and for Volpara volumetric breast density, 1.10 (0.67-1.81). The AUC for the LDA trained classifier was 0.68 (0.64-0.73), compared to 0.52 (0.47-0.57) for Volpara volumetric breast density (p < 0.001). The regression analysis of OR values for the LDA classifier also showed a significant increase in slope (p < 0.02). Mammographic texture features derived from digital mammograms are important quantitative measures for breast cancer risk assessment based models. Parenchymal texture analysis has an important role for stratifying breast cancer risk in women, which can be implemented to routine breast cancer screening strategies.
从历史上看,乳腺癌风险预测模型基于乳腺密度测量值,其本质上是二分的,通常将每个体素或乳腺实质区域归类为“致密”或“非致密”。使用这些传统方法,完全不考虑或忽略了乳腺组织元素的结构模式或纹理成分。本研究提出了一种新的方法,该方法结合了新的纹理和基于乳腺 X 线摄影术的密度图像特征来预测乳腺癌风险。我们对亚洲女性队列中 944 种新型和传统纹理和乳腺 X 线摄影术密度特征与乳腺癌风险的相关性进行了全面研究。我们研究了 250 例乳腺癌病例和 250 例对照,这些对照在全数字化乳腺摄影术(FFDM)状态、年龄、BMI 和种族方面相匹配。逐步回归分析确定了相关特征,这些特征被纳入线性判别分析(LDA)分类器模型,使用基于留一法的交叉验证方法进行训练和测试。接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)和调整后的比值比(OR)被用作我们研究中的两个性能评估指标。对于 LDA 训练的分类器,调整后的 OR 为 6.15(95%置信区间:3.55-10.64),而 Volpara 容积乳腺密度为 1.10(0.67-1.81)。LDA 训练的分类器的 AUC 为 0.68(0.64-0.73),而 Volpara 容积乳腺密度的 AUC 为 0.52(0.47-0.57)(p < 0.001)。LDA 分类器的 OR 值的回归分析也显示斜率显著增加(p < 0.02)。从数字乳腺 X 线摄影术获得的乳腺纹理特征是基于模型的乳腺癌风险评估的重要定量指标。实质纹理分析在分层女性乳腺癌风险方面具有重要作用,可将其纳入常规乳腺癌筛查策略。