Rodrigues Carla, Passet Virginie, Rakotondrasoa Andriniaina, Brisse Sylvain
Biodiversity and Epidemiology of Bacterial Pathogens, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Institut Pasteur Madagascar, Madagascar, Africa.
Front Microbiol. 2018 Dec 7;9:3000. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03000. eCollection 2018.
(phylogroup Kp1), one of the most problematic pathogens associated with antibiotic resistance worldwide, is phylogenetically closely related to [subsp. (Kp2) and subsp. (Kp4)], (Kp3) and two unnamed phylogroups (Kp5 and Kp6). Together, Kp1 to Kp6 make-up the complex. Currently, the phylogroups can be reliably identified only based on gene (or genome) sequencing. Misidentification using standard laboratory methods is common and consequently, the clinical significance of complex members is imprecisely defined. Here, we evaluated and validated the potential of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) to discriminate complex members. We detected mass spectrometry biomarkers associated with the phylogroups, with a sensitivity and specificity ranging between 80-100% and 97-100%, respectively. Strains within phylogroups Kp1, Kp2, Kp4, and Kp5 each shared two specific peaks not observed in other phylogroups. Kp3 strains shared a peak that was only observed otherwise in Kp5. Finally, Kp6 had a diagnostic peak shared only with Kp1. Kp3 and Kp6 could therefore be identified by exclusion criteria (lacking Kp5 and Kp1-specific peaks, respectively). Further, ranked Pearson correlation clustering of spectra grouped strains according to their phylogroup. The model was tested and successfully validated using different culture media. These results demonstrate the potential of MALDI-TOF MS for precise identification of complex members. Incorporation of spectra of all complex members into reference MALDI-TOF spectra databases, in which they are currently lacking, is desirable. MALDI-TOF MS may thereby enable a better understanding of the epidemiology, ecology, and pathogenesis of members of the complex.
(Kp1菌系)是全球范围内与抗生素耐药性相关的最具问题的病原体之一,在系统发育上与[亚种(Kp2)和亚种(Kp4)]、(Kp3)以及两个未命名的菌系(Kp5和Kp6)密切相关。Kp1至Kp6共同构成了Kp菌系复合体。目前,这些菌系只能通过基因(或基因组)测序来可靠鉴定。使用标准实验室方法进行错误鉴定很常见,因此,Kp菌系复合体成员的临床意义尚未明确界定。在此,我们评估并验证了基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)区分Kp菌系复合体成员的潜力。我们检测到了与这些菌系相关的质谱生物标志物,其灵敏度和特异性分别在80%-100%和97%-100%之间。Kp1、Kp2、Kp4和Kp5菌系中的菌株各自共享两个在其他菌系中未观察到的特定峰。Kp3菌株共享一个仅在Kp5中观察到的峰。最后,Kp6有一个仅与Kp1共享的诊断峰。因此,Kp3和Kp6可以通过排除标准来鉴定(分别缺乏Kp5和Kp1特异性峰)。此外,光谱的Pearson相关聚类排序根据菌系对菌株进行了分组。该模型使用不同培养基进行了测试并成功验证。这些结果证明了MALDI-TOF MS在精确鉴定Kp菌系复合体成员方面的潜力。将所有Kp菌系复合体成员的光谱纳入目前缺乏的参考MALDI-TOF光谱数据库是可取的。MALDI-TOF MS由此可能有助于更好地理解Kp菌系复合体成员的流行病学、生态学和发病机制。