Suppr超能文献

未被送往急诊科的拨打急救车服务电话的患者的结局:一项数据链接研究。

Outcomes for Patients Who Contact the Emergency Ambulance Service and Are Not Transported to the Emergency Department: A Data Linkage Study.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Jul-Aug;23(4):566-577. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1549628. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

Abstract

: Emergency ambulance services do not transport all patients to hospital. International literature reports non-transport rates ranging from 3.7-93.7%. In 2017, 38% of the 11 million calls received by ambulance services in England were attended by ambulance but not transported to an Emergency Department (ED). A further 10% received clinical advice over the telephone. Little is known about what happens to patients following a non-transport decision. We aimed to investigate what happens to patients following an emergency ambulance telephone call that resulted in a non-transport decision, using a linked routine data-set. : Six-months individual patient level data from one ambulance service in England, linked with Hospital Episode Statistics and national mortality data, were used to identify subsequent health events (ambulance re-contact, ED attendance, hospital admission, death) within 3 days (primary analysis) and 7 days (secondary analysis) of an ambulance call ending in non-transport to hospital. Non-clinical staff used a priority dispatch system e.g. Medical Priority Dispatch System to prioritize calls for ambulance dispatch. Non-transport to ED was determined by ambulance crew members at scene or clinicians at the emergency operating center when an ambulance was not dispatched (telephone advice). : The data linkage rate was 85% for patients who were discharged at scene (43,108/50,894). After removal of deaths associated with end of life care ( = 312), 9% (3,861/42,796) re-contacted the ambulance service, 12.6% (5,412/42,796) attended ED, 6.3% (2,694/42,796) were admitted to hospital, and 0.3% (129/42,796) died within 3 days of the call. Rates were higher for events occurring within 7 days. For example, 12% re-contacted the ambulance service, 16.1% attended ED, 9.3% were admitted to hospital, and 0.5% died. The linkage rate for telephone advice calls was low because ambulance services record less information about these patients (24% 2,514/10,634). A sensitivity analysis identified a range of subsequent event rates: 2.5-10.5% of patients were admitted to hospital and 0.06-0.24% of patient died within 3 days of the call. : Most non-transported patients did not have subsequent health events. Deaths after non-transport are an infrequent event that could be selected for more detailed review of individual cases, to facilitate learning and improvement.

摘要

: 紧急救护车服务并非将所有患者都送往医院。国际文献报告的非转运率为 3.7%至 93.7%。2017 年,英格兰救护车服务接到的 1100 万次呼叫中,有 38%的呼叫由救护车处理,但未送往急诊部(ED)。另有 10%的呼叫通过电话获得了临床建议。对于非转运决策后患者的情况知之甚少。我们旨在使用链接的常规数据集,调查在紧急救护车电话呼叫导致非转运决策后患者的情况。: 我们使用英格兰一家救护车服务的六个月个人患者水平数据,与医院入院统计数据和国家死亡率数据进行了链接,以确定救护车呼叫结束后 3 天(主要分析)和 7 天(次要分析)内的后续健康事件(救护车再次联系、ED 就诊、住院、死亡)。非临床人员使用医疗优先调度系统(例如医疗优先调度系统)对呼叫进行优先级调度,以便调度救护车。非转运至 ED 是由救护车人员在现场或紧急操作中心的临床医生确定的,当未派遣救护车时(电话建议)。: 对于在现场出院的患者,数据链接率为 85%(43,108/50,894)。去除与临终关怀相关的死亡(=312)后,9%(3,861/42,796)再次联系救护车服务,12.6%(5,412/42,796)就诊 ED,6.3%(2,694/42,796)住院,0.3%(129/42,796)在呼叫后 3 天内死亡。7 天内发生的事件发生率更高。例如,12%的人再次联系救护车服务,16.1%的人就诊 ED,9.3%的人住院,0.5%的人死亡。由于救护车服务记录的这些患者的信息较少,因此电话咨询电话的链接率较低(24%2,514/10,634)。一项敏感性分析确定了一系列后续事件发生率:呼叫后 3 天内,有 2.5%-10.5%的患者住院,0.06%-0.24%的患者死亡。: 大多数未转运的患者没有发生后续健康事件。非转运后的死亡是一种罕见事件,可以选择对个别病例进行更详细的审查,以促进学习和改进。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验