Suppr超能文献

皮肤镜检查诊断基底细胞癌的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for basal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Dermatology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 May;80(5):1380-1388. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.12.026. Epub 2018 Dec 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dermoscopy is a noninvasive technique for the diagnosis of skin lesions. Its accuracy for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) has not been systematically studied.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to systematically investigate the accuracy of dermoscopy for the diagnosis of BCC compared with examination with the naked eye.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies reporting the accuracy of naked eye examination and dermoscopy for the diagnosis of BCC was conducted. A meta-analysis for sensitivity and specificity was performed using a bivariate mixed-effects logistic regression modeling framework.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were identified. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of dermoscopy for the diagnosis of BCC were 91.2% and 95%, respectively. In studies comparing test performance, adding dermoscopy to naked eye examination improved sensitivity from 66.9% to 85% (P = .0001) and specificity from 97.2% to 98.2% (P = .006). The sensitivity and specificity of dermoscopy were higher for pigmented than nonpigmented BCC. Sensitivity increased when dermoscopy was performed by experts and when the diagnosis was based on in-person dermoscopy as opposed to dermoscopic photographs.

LIMITATIONS

Significant heterogeneity among studies with a medium-to-high risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

Dermoscopy is a sensitive and specific add-on tool for the diagnosis of BCC. It is especially valuable for pigmented BCC.

摘要

背景

皮肤镜检查是一种用于诊断皮肤病变的非侵入性技术。其对基底细胞癌 (BCC) 的诊断准确性尚未得到系统研究。

目的

我们旨在系统研究与肉眼检查相比,皮肤镜检查对 BCC 诊断的准确性。

方法

对报告肉眼检查和皮肤镜检查诊断 BCC 准确性的研究进行系统评价。使用双变量混合效应逻辑回归模型框架进行敏感性和特异性的荟萃分析。

结果

确定了 17 项研究。皮肤镜检查诊断 BCC 的汇总敏感性和特异性分别为 91.2%和 95%。在比较测试性能的研究中,将皮肤镜检查添加到肉眼检查中,可将敏感性从 66.9%提高到 85%(P=0.0001),特异性从 97.2%提高到 98.2%(P=0.006)。与非色素性 BCC 相比,皮肤镜检查对色素性 BCC 的敏感性和特异性更高。当皮肤镜检查由专家进行,并且诊断基于现场皮肤镜检查而不是皮肤镜照片时,敏感性会增加。

局限性

具有中等到高偏倚风险的研究之间存在显著异质性。

结论

皮肤镜检查是诊断 BCC 的一种敏感且特异性的辅助工具。它对色素性 BCC 尤其有价值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验