Federico Serena, Cassalia Fortunato, Mazza Marcodomenico, Del Fiore Paolo, Ferrera Nuria, Malvehy Josep, Trilli Irma, Rivas Ana Claudia, Cazzato Gerardo, Ingravallo Giuseppe, Ardigò Marco, Piscazzi Francesco
Dermatology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Dermatology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, 35121 Padua, Italy.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 20;15(16):2100. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15162100.
In recent decades, dermatological diagnostics have undergone a profound transformation, driven by the integration of new technologies alongside traditional methods. Classic techniques such as the Tzanck smear, potassium hydroxide (KOH) preparation, and Wood's lamp examination remain fundamental in everyday clinical practice due to their simplicity, speed, and accessibility. At the same time, the development of non-invasive imaging technologies and the application of artificial intelligence (AI) have opened new frontiers in the early detection and monitoring of both neoplastic and inflammatory skin diseases. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of how conventional and emerging diagnostic tools can be integrated into dermatologic practice. We examined a broad spectrum of diagnostic methods currently used in dermatology, ranging from traditional techniques to advanced approaches such as digital dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), optical coherence tomography (OCT), line-field confocal OCT (LC-OCT), 3D total body imaging systems with AI integration, mobile applications, electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and multispectral imaging. Each method is discussed in terms of diagnostic accuracy, clinical applications, and potential limitations. While traditional methods continue to play a crucial role-especially in resource-limited settings or for immediate bedside decision-making-modern tools significantly enhance diagnostic precision. Dermoscopy and its digital evolution have improved the accuracy of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma detection. RCM and LC-OCT allow near-histological visualization of skin structures, reducing the need for invasive procedures. AI-powered platforms support lesion tracking and risk stratification, though their routine implementation requires further clinical validation and regulatory oversight. Tools like EIS and multispectral imaging may offer additional value in diagnostically challenging cases. An effective diagnostic approach in dermatology should rely on a thoughtful combination of methods, selected based on clinical suspicion and guided by Bayesian reasoning. Rather than replacing traditional tools, advanced technologies should complement them-optimizing diagnostic accuracy, improving patient outcomes, and supporting more individualized, evidence-based care.
近几十年来,在新技术与传统方法相结合的推动下,皮肤病诊断发生了深刻变革。诸如Tzanck涂片、氢氧化钾(KOH)制剂及伍德灯检查等经典技术,因其简便、快速且易于操作,在日常临床实践中仍至关重要。与此同时,非侵入性成像技术的发展以及人工智能(AI)的应用,为肿瘤性和炎症性皮肤病的早期检测与监测开辟了新领域。本综述旨在全面概述如何将传统和新兴诊断工具整合到皮肤病诊疗实践中。我们研究了皮肤病学目前广泛使用的一系列诊断方法,从传统技术到先进方法,如数字皮肤镜检查、反射式共聚焦显微镜(RCM)、光学相干断层扫描(OCT)、线场共聚焦OCT(LC - OCT)、集成AI的3D全身成像系统、移动应用程序、电阻抗光谱(EIS)和多光谱成像。每种方法都从诊断准确性、临床应用和潜在局限性方面进行了讨论。虽然传统方法继续发挥着关键作用——特别是在资源有限的环境中或用于床边即时决策——但现代工具显著提高了诊断精度。皮肤镜检查及其数字演进提高了黑色素瘤和基底细胞癌检测的准确性。RCM和LC - OCT可实现皮肤结构的近组织学可视化,减少了侵入性检查的需求。AI驱动的平台支持病变跟踪和风险分层,不过其常规应用需要进一步的临床验证和监管监督。像EIS和多光谱成像这样的工具在诊断具有挑战性的病例中可能会提供额外价值。皮肤病学中有效的诊断方法应依靠基于临床怀疑并以贝叶斯推理为指导,对各种方法进行审慎组合。先进技术不应取代传统工具,而应与之相辅相成——优化诊断准确性、改善患者预后并支持更个性化的循证医疗。