• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刚正文化:放射科同行评议的实际应用。

Just Culture: Practical Implementation for Radiologist Peer Review.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.

Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.

出版信息

J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Mar;16(3):384-388. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.10.021. Epub 2018 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2018.10.021
PMID:30584040
Abstract

Peer review is a cornerstone of quality improvement programs and serves to support the peer learning process. Peer review in radiology incorporates the review of diagnostic imaging interpretation, interventional procedures, communication, and the evaluation of untoward patient events. A just culture is an environment in which errors and near-miss events are evaluated in a deliberately nonpunitive framework, avoiding a culture of blame and responsibility and focusing instead on error prevention and fostering a culture of continuous quality improvement. Adoption of a just culture requires careful attention to detail and relies on continuous coaching of individuals and teams to ensure future systems improvements and a culture of safety. The authors describe the practical implementation of a just culture framework for peer review in an academic radiology department and highlight its application to interpretive, noninterpretive, and procedural domains through case examples.

摘要

同行评议是质量改进计划的基石,有助于支持同行学习过程。放射科的同行评议包括诊断影像学解释、介入程序、沟通以及不良患者事件的评估。公正文化是一种在非惩罚性框架下评估错误和险些犯错事件的环境,避免了责备和责任文化,而是侧重于预防错误,并培养持续质量改进文化。公正文化的采用需要仔细注意细节,并依靠对个人和团队的持续指导,以确保未来的系统改进和安全文化。作者描述了在学术放射科中实施公正文化框架进行同行评议的实际情况,并通过案例示例强调了其在解释性、非解释性和程序性领域的应用。

相似文献

1
Just Culture: Practical Implementation for Radiologist Peer Review.刚正文化:放射科同行评议的实际应用。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Mar;16(3):384-388. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.10.021. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
2
Peer Feedback, Learning, and Improvement: Answering the Call of the Institute of Medicine Report on Diagnostic Error.同行反馈、学习和改进:响应医学研究所诊断错误报告的号召。
Radiology. 2017 Apr;283(1):231-241. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016161254. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
3
Peer review in clinical radiology practice.临床放射学实践中的同行评审。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Aug;199(2):W158-62. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8143.
4
Meaningful Peer Review in Radiology: A Review of Current Practices and Potential Future Directions.放射学中有意义的同行评审:当前实践与未来潜在方向综述
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Dec;13(12 Pt A):1519-1524. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
5
Practical considerations when implementing peer learning conferences.实施同伴学习会议时的实际考量
Pediatr Radiol. 2019 Apr;49(4):526-530. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4305-7. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
6
Quality and variability in diagnostic radiology.诊断放射学中的质量与变异性
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Feb;1(2):127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2003.11.001.
7
The next level of radiology peer review: enterprise-wide education and improvement.放射学同行评审的下一个层次:全企业范围的教育和改进。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 May;10(5):349-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.12.014.
8
Implementation of a Peer Learning Program Replacing Score-Based Peer Review in a Multispecialty Integrated Practice.实施同伴学习计划,以取代多专科整合实践中的基于评分的同伴评议。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Nov;211(5):949-956. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19891. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
9
Diagnostic Error Categorization at Abdominal Imaging Peer Learning Conference.腹部影像同行学习会议上的诊断错误分类
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2019 Nov-Dec;48(6):535-542. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
10
Radiologist Peer Review by Group Consensus.通过小组共识进行放射科医师同行评审。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Jun;13(6):656-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.11.013. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Institutional Courage in Healthcare: An Improvement Project Exploring the Perspectives of Veterans Exposed to Airborne Hazards.医疗保健中的机构勇气:一项探索接触空气传播危害的退伍军人观点的改进项目。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 May 17;13(5):423. doi: 10.3390/bs13050423.
2
Is There a Relationship Between Facility Peer Review Findings and Quality in the Veterans Health Administration?退伍军人健康管理局中机构同行评审结果与质量之间存在关联吗?
Fed Pract. 2022 May;39(5):208-211. doi: 10.12788/fp.0268. Epub 2022 May 13.