Masoro E J
Department of Physiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284.
Exp Gerontol. 1988;23(4-5):391-7. doi: 10.1016/0531-5565(88)90043-5.
Superficially physiological measurements and processes would appear to be excellent candidates to serve as biomarkers of aging. A considered analysis reveals that the validation of them as biomarkers of aging is difficult. The available evidence indicates that the concept of physiological age does not appear to be of much value. Although physiological measurements can serve as predictors of the future occurrence of age-associated diseases and as predictors of impending mortality, such predictors may be of little value as markers of the aging processes. It seems likely that physiological markers of aging can be validated only through the appropriate use of maximum life span and the knowledge base that must be obtained to do so is discussed.
从表面上看,生理测量和过程似乎是作为衰老生物标志物的绝佳候选者。经过深思熟虑的分析表明,将它们验证为衰老生物标志物是困难的。现有证据表明,生理年龄的概念似乎没有太大价值。虽然生理测量可以作为与年龄相关疾病未来发生的预测指标以及即将死亡的预测指标,但这样的预测指标作为衰老过程的标志物可能价值不大。衰老的生理标志物似乎只有通过适当地使用最大寿命才能得到验证,并且讨论了为此必须获取的知识库。