Gordon F. Derner School of Psychology, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY, USA.
Department of Psychology and Education Sciences, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iasi, Romania.
Attach Hum Dev. 2020 Jun;22(3):290-309. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2018.1557716. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
This study assessed how children's choices of attachment figures are related to the quality of the parent-child relationship and parental economic migration in a Romanian sample. Two hundred and twenty-two children (n girls =130) 10-13 years of age completed the Attachment Figure Interview and a parental migration interview, and reported their attachment security with mother and father. Approximately 35.6% (n = 79) of children had mothers with a migration history and 48.7% (n = 104) of children had fathers with a migration history. Mothers, and to some extent fathers, serve as primary attachment figures. Grandparents, peers, siblings and relatives serve as secondary attachment figures in some situations. Further, children are less likely to choose mothers as primary attachment figures and show lower attachment security when their mothers rather than their fathers have a history of migration. Overall, this study provides empirical grounds to conceptualize parental migration as an attachment disruption.
本研究评估了儿童选择依恋对象的方式与罗马尼亚样本中亲子关系质量和父母经济移民的关系。222 名儿童(女生 n=130)年龄在 10-13 岁,完成了依恋对象访谈和父母移民访谈,并报告了他们与母亲和父亲的依恋安全性。大约 35.6%(n=79)的儿童的母亲有移民史,48.7%(n=104)的儿童的父亲有移民史。母亲,在某种程度上还有父亲,是主要的依恋对象。在某些情况下,祖父母、同伴、兄弟姐妹和亲戚是次要的依恋对象。此外,当孩子的母亲而不是父亲有移民史时,他们不太可能选择母亲作为主要依恋对象,并且表现出较低的依恋安全性。总的来说,这项研究为将父母移民视为一种依恋中断提供了实证依据。