• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遗传毒性危害的前瞻性检测与评估:对L. 埃伦贝格贡献的批判性评价

Prospective detection and assessment of genotoxic hazards: a critical appreciation of the contribution of L. Ehrenberg.

作者信息

Wright A S, Bradshaw T K, Watson W P

机构信息

Shell Research Ltd, Sittingbourne Research Centre, Kent, UK.

出版信息

IARC Sci Publ. 1988(89):237-48.

PMID:3058596
Abstract

Advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of chemical carcinogenesis are now being applied to improve the quality of prospective risk assessment. The contribution of Ehrenberg and his colleagues (at the University of Stockholm) probably represents the most comprehensive application of mechanistic knowledge to this field during the past 20 years. The strategic approach developed by the Swedish group was based on the identification of differences between man and experimental risk models in factors that determine the relationships between exposure and biological response and the development of methods to compensate for these differences. Many of the critical stages in chemical carcinogenesis and the cellular determinants of these stages have now been identified. As a first step in seeking to improve risk assessment, Ehrenberg introduced the target dose concept, in which the doses of carcinogens penetrating to the cellular target (DNA) are determined. This approach provides an improved basis for determining exposures to carcinogenic agents and also for compensating for species differences in factors such as metabolism that determine the relationships between exposure dose and the dose at the critical target. The target dose concept is now widely accepted and has led to the development of new biomedical monitoring techniques, based, for example, on the measurement of haemoglobin adducts, which are now being applied to detect and identify genotoxic hazards. The introduction of the target dose concept has led to significant improvements in the quality of prospective risk assessment. Further improvements necessitate procedures to compensate for differences between man and prospective risk models in factors that determine subsequent stages of the carcinogenic process. Ehrenberg has proposed that the rad-equivalence approach may be of value in this respect. Its application has accurately predicted the incidence of leukaemias in occupational cohorts which had exposures to ethylene oxide in common. The possible general applicability of this approach is discussed.

摘要

我们对化学致癌机制认识的进展如今正被用于提高前瞻性风险评估的质量。埃伦贝格及其同事(斯德哥尔摩大学)的贡献或许代表了过去20年里机制知识在该领域最全面的应用。瑞典团队制定的战略方法基于识别在决定暴露与生物反应关系的因素方面人类与实验风险模型之间的差异,并开发弥补这些差异的方法。化学致癌过程中的许多关键阶段以及这些阶段的细胞决定因素现已被确定。作为寻求改进风险评估的第一步,埃伦贝格引入了靶剂量概念,即确定穿透到细胞靶点(DNA)的致癌物剂量。这种方法为确定致癌物暴露以及弥补诸如代谢等决定暴露剂量与关键靶点剂量之间关系的因素中的物种差异提供了更好的基础。靶剂量概念如今已被广泛接受,并催生了新的生物医学监测技术的发展,例如基于血红蛋白加合物测量的技术,这些技术现正被用于检测和识别基因毒性危害。靶剂量概念的引入已使前瞻性风险评估的质量有了显著提高。进一步的改进需要有程序来弥补人类与前瞻性风险模型在决定致癌过程后续阶段的因素方面的差异。埃伦贝格提出在这方面拉德当量方法可能有价值。其应用已准确预测了共同暴露于环氧乙烷的职业人群中白血病的发病率。本文讨论了该方法可能的普遍适用性。

相似文献

1
Prospective detection and assessment of genotoxic hazards: a critical appreciation of the contribution of L. Ehrenberg.遗传毒性危害的前瞻性检测与评估:对L. 埃伦贝格贡献的批判性评价
IARC Sci Publ. 1988(89):237-48.
2
Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?长期生物测定得出的肿瘤发生率能告诉我们关于致癌物我们需要了解的信息吗?
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005 Mar;41(2):128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.11.001. Epub 2004 Dec 19.
3
Carcinogenicity categorization of chemicals-new aspects to be considered in a European perspective.化学品的致癌性分类——从欧洲视角看需考虑的新方面
Toxicol Lett. 2004 Jun 15;151(1):29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.04.004.
4
Cancer risk assessment for 1,3-butadiene: data integration opportunities.1,3 - 丁二烯的癌症风险评估:数据整合机会
Chem Biol Interact. 2007 Mar 20;166(1-3):150-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2006.03.009. Epub 2006 Apr 5.
5
Environmental and chemical carcinogenesis.环境与化学致癌作用
Semin Cancer Biol. 2004 Dec;14(6):473-86. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2004.06.010.
6
Ethyl methanesulfonate toxicity in Viracept--a comprehensive human risk assessment based on threshold data for genotoxicity.奈韦拉平中甲烷磺酸乙酯的毒性——基于遗传毒性阈值数据的全面人体风险评估
Toxicol Lett. 2009 Nov 12;190(3):317-29. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.04.003. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
7
Estimation of the cancer risk of genotoxic chemicals by the rad-equivalence approach.通过辐射等效方法估算遗传毒性化学物质的癌症风险。
IARC Sci Publ. 1988(89):258-64.
8
Biomarkers in toxicology and risk assessment: informing critical dose-response relationships.毒理学与风险评估中的生物标志物:为关键剂量-反应关系提供信息。
Chem Res Toxicol. 2008 Jan;21(1):253-65. doi: 10.1021/tx700408t. Epub 2007 Dec 28.
9
[Cancer--occupational exposure and genetics].[癌症——职业暴露与遗传学]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989 May 20;109(14):1529-34.
10
Cancer risk assessment for crotonaldehyde and 2-hexenal: an approach.巴豆醛和2-己烯醛的癌症风险评估:一种方法。
IARC Sci Publ. 1999(150):219-32.