• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

登记出生统计数据对卫生和社会政策有多大用处?对出生登记数据的可得性和质量进行的全球系统评估。

How useful are registered birth statistics for health and social policy? A global systematic assessment of the availability and quality of birth registration data.

作者信息

Phillips David E, Adair Tim, Lopez Alan D

机构信息

Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Popul Health Metr. 2018 Dec 27;16(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12963-018-0180-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12963-018-0180-6
PMID:30587201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6307230/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The registration and certification of births has a wide array of individual and societal benefits. While near-universal in some parts of the world, birth registration is less common in many low- and middle-income countries, and the quality of vital statistics vary. We assembled publicly available birth registration records for as many countries as possible into a novel global birth registration database, and we present a systematic assessment of available data.

METHODS

We obtained 4918 country-years of data from 145 countries covering the period 1948-2015. We compared these to existing estimates of total births to assess completeness of public data and adapted existing methods to evaluate the quality and timeliness of the data.

RESULTS

Since 1980, approximately one billion births were registered and shared in public databases. Compared to estimates of fertility, this represents only 40.0% of total births in the peak year, 2011. Approximately 74 million births (53.1%) per year occur in countries whose systems do not systematically register them and release the aggregate records. Considering data quality, timeliness, and completeness in country-years where data are available, only about 12 million births per year (8.6%) occur in countries with high-performing registration systems.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis highlights the gaps in available data. Our objective and low-cost approach to assessing the performance of birth registration systems can be helpful to monitor country progress, and to help national and international policymakers set targets for strengthening birth registration systems.

摘要

背景

出生登记与认证具有广泛的个人和社会效益。虽然在世界某些地区已接近普及,但在许多低收入和中等收入国家,出生登记并不常见,且人口动态统计数据的质量参差不齐。我们尽可能多地收集了公开可用的各国出生登记记录,构建了一个全新的全球出生登记数据库,并对现有数据进行了系统评估。

方法

我们获取了145个国家在1948年至2015年期间的4918个国家年度数据。我们将这些数据与现有总出生人数估计值进行比较,以评估公共数据的完整性,并采用现有方法评估数据的质量和及时性。

结果

自1980年以来,约有10亿例出生登记并共享于公共数据库。与生育率估计值相比,这仅占2011年峰值年份总出生人数的40.0%。每年约有7400万例出生(占53.1%)发生在其系统未进行系统登记并公布汇总记录的国家。考虑到有数据可查的国家年度中的数据质量、及时性和完整性,每年仅有约1200万例出生(占8.6%)发生在登记系统表现良好的国家。

结论

该分析凸显了现有数据存在的差距。我们评估出生登记系统性能的客观且低成本方法,有助于监测各国进展,并帮助国家和国际政策制定者设定加强出生登记系统的目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d916/6307230/0f8eaaebd6e0/12963_2018_180_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d916/6307230/a19ca6fb5001/12963_2018_180_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d916/6307230/0f8eaaebd6e0/12963_2018_180_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d916/6307230/a19ca6fb5001/12963_2018_180_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d916/6307230/0f8eaaebd6e0/12963_2018_180_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
How useful are registered birth statistics for health and social policy? A global systematic assessment of the availability and quality of birth registration data.登记出生统计数据对卫生和社会政策有多大用处?对出生登记数据的可得性和质量进行的全球系统评估。
Popul Health Metr. 2018 Dec 27;16(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12963-018-0180-6.
2
Global analysis of birth statistics from civil registration and vital statistics systems.全球出生统计数据的民事登记和生命统计系统分析。
Bull World Health Organ. 2023 Dec 1;101(12):768-776. doi: 10.2471/BLT.22.289035. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
3
An evaluation of vital registers as sources of data for infant mortality rates in Cameroon.喀麦隆生命登记作为婴儿死亡率数据来源的评估。
Int J Epidemiol. 1994 Jun;23(3):536-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/23.3.536.
4
The way forward.前进的道路。
Lancet. 2007 Nov 24;370(9601):1791-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61310-5. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
5
How reliable are self-reported estimates of birth registration completeness? Comparison with vital statistics systems.自我报告的出生登记完整性估计有多可靠?与生命统计系统的比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 8;16(6):e0252140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252140. eCollection 2021.
6
When civil registration is inadequate: interim methods for generating vital statistics.当民事登记不完善时:生成人口动态统计数据的临时方法。
Pac Health Dialog. 2012 Apr;18(1):215-30.
7
Evaluation of approaches to strengthen civil registration and vital statistics systems: A systematic review and synthesis of policies in 25 countries.评估加强民事登记和人口动态统计系统的方法:对 25 个国家政策的系统评价和综合分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Sep 27;16(9):e1002929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002929. eCollection 2019 Sep.
8
Registration of births, stillbirths and infant deaths in Jamaica.牙买加的出生、死产和婴儿死亡登记。
Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Aug;25(4):807-13. doi: 10.1093/ije/25.4.807.
9
Estimating completeness of birth registration in South Africa, 1996 - 2011.估计南非 1996-2011 年出生登记的完整性。
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Jul 1;97(7):468-476. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.222620. Epub 2019 May 28.
10
Estimating the completeness of births and deaths registration in Egypt through dual record systems.通过双重记录系统估算埃及出生和死亡登记的完整性。
Genus. 1985 Jan-Jun;41(1-2):119-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Research protocol - Evaluating data quality in the Netherlands Perinatal Registry (Perined): A data comparison study using hospital records from the IUGR Risk Selection (IRIS) study.研究方案 - 评估荷兰围产期登记处(Perined)的数据质量:一项使用宫内生长受限风险筛选(IRIS)研究中的医院记录进行的数据比较研究。
F1000Res. 2025 Jan 9;13:686. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.150160.2. eCollection 2024.
2
The pandemic preterm paradox: a test of competing explanations.大流行早产悖论:对相互竞争的解释的检验。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 2;193(12):1823-1831. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae128.
3
Global analysis of birth statistics from civil registration and vital statistics systems.

本文引用的文献

1
Does birth under-registration reduce childhood immunization? Evidence from the Dominican Republic.出生登记不足会降低儿童免疫接种率吗?来自多米尼加共和国的证据。
Health Econ Rev. 2017 Dec;7(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13561-017-0149-3. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
2
Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.1990 - 2015年全球、区域和国家310种疾病和损伤的发病率、患病率及伤残调整生命年:全球疾病负担研究2015的系统分析
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1545-1602. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6.
3
全球出生统计数据的民事登记和生命统计系统分析。
Bull World Health Organ. 2023 Dec 1;101(12):768-776. doi: 10.2471/BLT.22.289035. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
4
The Need to Address Fragmentation and Silos in Mortality Information Systems: The Case of Ghana and Peru.需要解决死亡率信息系统中的碎片化和孤岛问题:以加纳和秘鲁为例。
Int J Public Health. 2022 Dec 14;67:1604721. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604721. eCollection 2022.
5
Multilevel analysis of individual- and community-level determinants of birth certification of children under-5 years in Nigeria: evidence from a household survey.多水平分析尼日利亚 5 岁以下儿童出生证明的个体和社区决定因素:来自家庭调查的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 14;22(1):2340. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14786-2.
6
Inequalities in Birth Weight in Relation to Maternal Factors: A Population-Based Study of 3,813,757 Live Births.出生体重与母体因素的关系不平等:基于 3813757 例活产的基于人群的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 26;19(3):1384. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031384.
7
How reliable are self-reported estimates of birth registration completeness? Comparison with vital statistics systems.自我报告的出生登记完整性估计有多可靠?与生命统计系统的比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 8;16(6):e0252140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252140. eCollection 2021.
8
Birth registration in India: Are wealth inequities decreasing?印度的出生登记:财富不平等现象在减少吗?
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Jan 12;13:100728. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100728. eCollection 2021 Mar.
9
Decentralization of birth registration to Local Government in Tanzania: the association with completeness of birth registration and certification.坦桑尼亚将出生登记权下放到地方政府:与出生登记和证明完整性的关联。
Glob Health Action. 2020 Dec 31;13(1):1831795. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1831795.
10
Status and associated factors of birth registration in selected districts of Tigray region, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚提格雷地区部分地区的出生登记现状及相关因素。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2020 Jul 29;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12914-020-00235-x.
Civil registration and vital statistics: progress in the data revolution for counting and accountability.
民事登记和人口动态统计:数据革命在计数与问责方面的进展。
Lancet. 2015 Oct 3;386(10001):1373-1385. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60173-8. Epub 2015 May 10.
4
Are well functioning civil registration and vital statistics systems associated with better health outcomes?健全的民事登记和人口动态统计系统是否与更好的健康结果相关?
Lancet. 2015 Oct 3;386(10001):1386-1394. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60172-6. Epub 2015 May 10.
5
A global assessment of civil registration and vital statistics systems: monitoring data quality and progress.全球民事登记与生命统计系统评估:监测数据质量和进展。
Lancet. 2015 Oct 3;386(10001):1395-1406. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60171-4. Epub 2015 May 10.
6
Towards universal civil registration and vital statistics systems: the time is now.迈向全民民事登记和生命统计系统:现在正是时候。
Lancet. 2015 Oct 3;386(10001):1407-1418. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60170-2. Epub 2015 May 10.
7
Maternal mortality in rural south Ethiopia: outcomes of community-based birth registration by health extension workers.埃塞俄比亚南部农村地区的孕产妇死亡率:健康推广工作者进行社区出生登记的成果
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 23;10(3):e0119321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119321. eCollection 2015.
8
A composite metric for assessing data on mortality and causes of death: the vital statistics performance index.用于评估死亡率和死因数据的综合指标:生命统计绩效指数。
Popul Health Metr. 2014 May 14;12:14. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-12-14. eCollection 2014.
9
Robust metrics for assessing the performance of different verbal autopsy cause assignment methods in validation studies.用于评估验证研究中不同死因推断方法性能的稳健指标。
Popul Health Metr. 2011 Aug 4;9:28. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-9-28.
10
A scandal of invisibility: making everyone count by counting everyone.一场隐形的丑闻:通过统计每一个人来让每个人都被纳入考量。
Lancet. 2007 Nov 3;370(9598):1569-77. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61307-5.