Knutsson Linda, Seidemo Anina, Rydhög Scherman Anna, Markenroth Bloch Karin, Kalyani Rita R, Andersen Mads, Sundgren Pia C, Wirestam Ronnie, Helms Gunther, van Zijl Peter C M, Xu Xiang
Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Tomography. 2018 Dec;4(4):164-171. doi: 10.18383/j.tom.2018.00025.
Dynamic glucose-enhanced (DGE) imaging uses chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance imaging to retrieve information about the microcirculation using infusion of a natural sugar (D-glucose). However, this new approach is not yet well understood with respect to the dynamic tissue response. DGE time curves for arteries, normal brain tissue, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were analyzed in healthy volunteers and compared with the time dependence of sampled venous plasma blood glucose levels. The arterial response curves (arterial input function [AIF]) compared reasonably well in shape with the time curves of the sampled glucose levels but could also differ substantially. The brain tissue response curves showed mainly negative responses with a peak intensity that was of the order of 10 times smaller than the AIF peak and a shape that was susceptible to both noise and partial volume effects with CSF, attributed to the low contrast-to-noise ratio. The CSF response curves showed a rather large and steady increase of the glucose uptake during the scan, due to the rapid uptake of D-glucose in CSF. Importantly, and contrary to gadolinium studies, the curves differed substantially among volunteers, which was interpreted to be caused by variations in insulin response. In conclusion, while AIFs and tissue response curves can be measured in DGE experiments, partial volume effects, low concentration of D-glucose in tissue, and osmolality effects between tissue and blood may prohibit quantification of normal tissue perfusion parameters. However, separation of tumor responses from normal tissue responses would most likely be feasible.
动态葡萄糖增强(DGE)成像利用化学交换饱和转移磁共振成像,通过注入天然糖(D-葡萄糖)来获取有关微循环的信息。然而,这种新方法在动态组织反应方面尚未得到很好的理解。在健康志愿者中分析了动脉、正常脑组织和脑脊液(CSF)的DGE时间曲线,并与采样静脉血浆血糖水平的时间依赖性进行了比较。动脉反应曲线(动脉输入函数[AIF])在形状上与采样葡萄糖水平的时间曲线比较吻合,但也可能存在显著差异。脑组织反应曲线主要显示为负反应,其峰值强度比AIF峰值小约10倍,并且由于低对比度噪声比,其形状易受噪声和脑脊液部分容积效应的影响。脑脊液反应曲线显示在扫描期间葡萄糖摄取有相当大且稳定的增加,这是由于D-葡萄糖在脑脊液中快速摄取所致。重要的是,与钆剂研究相反,志愿者之间的曲线存在显著差异,这被解释为是由胰岛素反应的变化引起的。总之,虽然在DGE实验中可以测量AIF和组织反应曲线,但部分容积效应、组织中D-葡萄糖浓度低以及组织与血液之间的渗透压效应可能会妨碍正常组织灌注参数的量化。然而,将肿瘤反应与正常组织反应区分开来很可能是可行的。