• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adopting Biosimilars and Achieving Goals of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act: A Survey of Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy Professionals.克服采用生物类似药障碍和实现生物仿制药价格竞争与创新法案目标的策略:一项对管理式医疗保健和专科药房专业人员的调查。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Aug;25(8):904-912. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.18412. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
2
Overcoming barriers to biosimilar adoption: real-world perspectives from a national payer and provider initiative.克服生物类似药采用的障碍:国家支付方和提供方倡议的实际观点。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Aug;27(8):1129-1135. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.8.1129.
3
AMCP Partnership Forum: Biosimilars--Ready, Set, Launch.AMCP 合作论坛:生物类似药——准备就绪,启动在即。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Apr;22(4):434-40. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.4.434.
4
Biosimilar competition in the United States: statutory incentives, payers, and pharmacy benefit managers.美国的生物类似药竞争:法定激励措施、支付方及药品福利管理机构
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Feb;34(2):294-301. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0482.
5
Utilizing data consortia to monitor safety and effectiveness of biosimilars and their innovator products.利用数据联盟监测生物类似药及其原研产品的安全性和有效性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Jan;21(1):23-34. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.1.23.
6
A regional analysis of payer and provider views on cholesterol management: PCSK9 inhibitors as an illustrative alignment model.支付方和提供方对胆固醇管理看法的区域性分析:以 PCSK9 抑制剂为例的协同作用模式。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Dec;26(12):1517-1528. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.12.1517.
7
Biosimilar Naming Conventions: Pharmacist Perceptions and Impact on Confidence in Dispensing Biologics.生物类似药命名惯例:药剂师的看法及其对生物制剂配药信心的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Aug;22(8):919-26. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.8.919.
8
The Current Status of Outcomes-Based Contracting for Manufacturers and Payers: An AMCP Membership Survey.基于结果的制造商和支付者合同的现状:AMCP 会员调查。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 May;24(5):410-415. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.16326. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
9
Optimizing use and addressing challenges to uptake of biosimilars.优化生物类似药的使用并解决其采用面临的挑战。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Nov;24(21 Suppl):S457-S461.
10
A survey of global biosimilar implementation practice conducted by the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners.国际肿瘤药学从业者协会开展的一项关于全球生物类似药实施实践的调查。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2020 Apr;26(3_suppl):22-32. doi: 10.1177/1078155220913098.

引用本文的文献

1
Introduction of Biopharmaceuticals in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Study of Early Diffusion Patterns and Data Availability.欧洲生物制药的引入:早期扩散模式与数据可用性的横断面研究
BioDrugs. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s40259-025-00732-2.
2
Individual Prescribing Incentives for Biosimilars in Selected European Countries and the USA: a Scoping Literature Review.欧洲部分国家和美国生物类似药的个体处方激励措施:一项范围界定文献综述
BioDrugs. 2025 Sep;39(5):777-791. doi: 10.1007/s40259-025-00736-y. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
3
Innovative Formulation Strategies for Biosimilars: Trends Focused on Buffer-Free Systems, Safety, Regulatory Alignment, and Intellectual Property Challenges.生物类似药的创新制剂策略:聚焦无缓冲系统、安全性、监管一致性及知识产权挑战的趋势
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jun 17;18(6):908. doi: 10.3390/ph18060908.
4
Facilitators and barriers to generic and biosimilar medications in the Middle East and North Africa: insights from physicians and pharmacists-a systematic review.中东和北非地区仿制药和生物类似药的促进因素与障碍:来自医生和药剂师的见解——一项系统综述
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 May;81(5):647-665. doi: 10.1007/s00228-025-03819-5. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
5
Clinical Guide to Navigating the Landscape of Biosimilars for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.炎症性肠病生物类似药领域导航临床指南
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2024 Jul;20(7):376-382.
6
Biosimilars in the Era of Artificial Intelligence-International Regulations and the Use in Oncological Treatments.人工智能时代的生物类似药——国际法规及在肿瘤治疗中的应用
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jul 10;17(7):925. doi: 10.3390/ph17070925.
7
Patient's and Consultant's Views and Perceptions on Switching from an Originator Biologic to Biosimilar Medication: A Qualitative Study.患者及会诊医生对从原研生物药转换为生物类似药的观点与认知:一项定性研究
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Apr 7;12(2):65. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12020065.
8
A Framework for Evaluating the Implementation of Biosimilar Drugs.一种评估生物类似药实施情况的框架。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2023 Mar 1;76(2):109-116. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.3272. eCollection 2023 Spring.
9
Prescriber Perspectives on Biosimilar Adoption and Potential Role of Clinical Pharmacology: A Workshop Summary.《关于生物类似药采用的处方医生观点和临床药理学的潜在作用:研讨会总结》。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jan;113(1):37-49. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2765. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
10
Understanding US Physician and Pharmacist Attitudes Toward Biosimilar Products: A Qualitative Study.了解美国医生和药剂师对生物类似药产品的态度:一项定性研究。
BioDrugs. 2022 Sep;36(5):645-655. doi: 10.1007/s40259-022-00545-7. Epub 2022 Aug 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Harnessing the Biologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium to Evaluate Patterns of Care.利用生物制剂和生物类似药集体智慧联盟来评估护理模式。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Nov;25(11):1156-1161. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.19041. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
2
Factors Affecting Health Care Provider Knowledge and Acceptance of Biosimilar Medicines: A Systematic Review.影响医疗保健提供者对生物类似药认知和接受度的因素:系统评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jan;25(1):102-112. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.1.102.
3
Why Biologics and Biosimilars Remain So Expensive: Despite Two Wins for Biosimilars, the Supreme Court's Recent Rulings do not Solve Fundamental Barriers to Competition.生物制剂和生物类似药为何仍然如此昂贵:尽管生物类似药取得了两项胜利,但最高法院最近的裁决并未解决竞争的根本障碍。
Drugs. 2018 Nov;78(17):1777-1781. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-1009-0.
4
Systematic review: efficacy and safety of switching patients between reference and biosimilar infliximab.系统评价:英夫利昔单抗参照药和生物类似药之间转换治疗的疗效和安全性。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jan;49(1):31-40. doi: 10.1111/apt.14997. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
5
Biosimilar Cost Savings in the United States: Initial Experience and Future Potential.美国生物类似药的成本节约:初步经验与未来潜力
Rand Health Q. 2018 Mar 30;7(4):3. eCollection 2018 Mar.
6
Meeting Report: AGA Biosimilars Roundtable.会议报告:美国胃肠病学会生物类似药圆桌会议
Gastroenterology. 2018 Apr;154(5):e1-e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
7
American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: Biosimilars in Oncology.美国临床肿瘤学会声明:肿瘤生物类似药。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 20;36(12):1260-1265. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.4893. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
8
Following the Biosimilar Breadcrumbs: When Health Systems and Manufacturers Approach Forks in the Road.循着生物类似药的踪迹:当医疗体系与药厂面临分岔路时。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Dec;23(12):1245-1248. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.12.1245.
9
Can biosimilars help achieve the goals of US health care reform?生物类似药能否助力实现美国医疗保健改革的目标?
Cancer Manag Res. 2017 Jun 1;9:197-205. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S133442. eCollection 2017.
10
Clinical development of biologicals and biosimilars - safety concerns.生物制品和生物类似药的临床开发——安全性问题
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jun;10(6):567-569. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2017.1293522. Epub 2017 May 5.

克服采用生物类似药障碍和实现生物仿制药价格竞争与创新法案目标的策略:一项对管理式医疗保健和专科药房专业人员的调查。

Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adopting Biosimilars and Achieving Goals of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act: A Survey of Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy Professionals.

机构信息

1PRIME Education, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

2Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy, Alexandria, Virginia.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Aug;25(8):904-912. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.18412. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2019.18412
PMID:31007119
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10397695/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) of 2009, which included pathways for FDA approval of biosimilar products, was designed to promote more affordable, expanded patient access to biologic therapies. Achieving these BPCIA goals depends on overcoming formidable barriers to biosimilar adoption. Managed care and specialty pharmacy professionals are uniquely qualified to inform initiatives to address these barriers.

OBJECTIVE

To assess perceptions regarding strategies for overcoming barriers to biosimilar adoption among managed care and specialty pharmacy professionals by conducting a survey study.

METHODS

Invitations to complete the online survey were emailed by the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) to members and customers and to contacts sourced from a commercial database. In addition to questions on respondent demographics and perceptions of biosimilars, the survey listed 16 strategies for overcoming key barriers to biosimilar adoption. On a 5-point scale, participants rated their opinion on the likelihood that each strategy would have the potential to assist in achieving BPCIA goals. The survey also listed 6 barriers to biosimilar adoption. On a 5-point scale, participants rated their perceived difficulty in overcoming each barrier. The survey concluded with an open-text item that asked participants to list 3 additional strategies for overcoming biosimilar adoption barriers. Response frequencies were calculated to describe participants' ratings of the strategies and barriers. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess whether the ratings differed among respondents grouped by work organization. For the open-text item, we conducted qualitative content analyses to categorize strategies by stakeholder groups that might take primary implementation roles.

RESULTS

A total of 300 managed care and specialty pharmacy professionals completed the survey. There was considerable variation in the preferences, policies, and practices regarding biosimilar adoption among respondents' work organizations. Responses to several survey items reflected positive attitudes about the safety and efficacy of biosimilars; for example, 84% agreed or strongly agreed that FDA-approved biosimilars are safe and effective for patients who switch from a reference biologic. Based on pooled percentages for ratings of likely and extremely likely to overcome barriers to biosimilar adoption, the highest-rated strategies were for prescriber education about evidence from switching studies (91%) and FDA guidance on pharmacy-level substitution of reference biologics with biosimilars (90%). The lowest-rated strategies were for requiring therapeutic drug monitoring for patients who switch to biosimilars (39%) and using quotas to incentivize providers to prescribe biosimilars (40%). For the qualitative analysis, the highest numbers of respondents' suggested strategies indicated primary implementation roles of biosimilar manufacturers (40%), the federal government (26%), and managed care organizations (15%).

CONCLUSIONS

Reflecting the unique knowledge, perspectives, and practices of managed care and specialty pharmacy professionals, the study findings are relevant to informing and advancing initiatives for achieving BPCIA goals.

DISCLOSURES

The survey study reported in this article was part of a continuing education program funded by an independent educational grant, which was awarded by Sandoz, a Novartis Division, to PRIME Education. The Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) received grant funding from PRIME to assist in developing the survey and writing the manuscript. The grantor had no role in the study design, execution, analysis, or reporting. Greene and Pardo are employed by PRIME. Singh and Carden are employed by AMCP. Greene, Singh, Carden, and Pardo have no other disclosures. Lichtenstein received an honorarium from PRIME for serving as faculty for the continuing education program and has been a consultant for Pfizer, Cellceutix, and Merck.

摘要

背景

2009 年的生物仿制药价格竞争与创新法案(BPCIA)包括了 FDA 批准生物类似药的途径,旨在促进更实惠、扩大生物治疗的患者可及性。实现这些 BPCIA 目标取决于克服生物类似药采用的巨大障碍。管理式医疗和专业药房专业人员有资格为解决这些障碍的举措提供信息。

目的

通过进行调查研究,评估管理式医疗和专业药房专业人员对克服生物类似药采用障碍的策略的看法。

方法

通过 Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy(AMCP)向成员和客户以及从商业数据库中获取的联系人的电子邮件发送完成在线调查的邀请。除了关于受访者人口统计学和对生物类似物的看法的问题外,该调查还列出了克服生物类似物采用关键障碍的 16 种策略。参与者在 5 分制上对每种策略在帮助实现 BPCIA 目标方面的潜力进行了评价。该调查还列出了 6 个生物类似物采用障碍。参与者在 5 分制上对克服每个障碍的难度进行了评价。调查最后有一个开放文本项,要求参与者列出克服生物类似物采用障碍的另外 3 种策略。对参与者对策略和障碍的评价进行了频率计算。对按工作组织分组的受访者进行了统计分析,以评估评分是否存在差异。对于开放文本项,我们进行了定性内容分析,按可能承担主要实施角色的利益相关者群体对策略进行了分类。

结果

共有 300 名管理式医疗和专业药房专业人员完成了调查。受访者工作组织之间在生物类似物采用方面的偏好、政策和做法存在相当大的差异。对调查项目的几个回应反映了对生物类似物的安全性和有效性的积极态度;例如,84%的人同意或强烈同意 FDA 批准的生物类似物对从参考生物制剂转换的患者是安全有效的。根据对克服生物类似物采用障碍的可能性和极有可能的评分汇总百分比,评分最高的策略是针对医生进行有关转换研究证据的教育(91%)和 FDA 关于参考生物制剂与生物类似物在药房级别替代的指导(90%)。评分最低的策略是要求患者在转换为生物类似物时进行治疗药物监测(39%)和使用配额来激励提供者开生物类似物(40%)。对于定性分析,提出的策略中,有最高数量的受访者表示生物类似物制造商(40%)、联邦政府(26%)和管理式医疗组织(15%)应承担主要实施角色。

结论

反映了管理式医疗和专业药房专业人员的独特知识、观点和实践,研究结果与为实现 BPCIA 目标的举措提供信息和推进相关。

披露

本文报道的调查研究是由 Sandoz(诺华制药的一个部门)资助的继续教育计划的一部分,该计划由 PRIME Education 授予 Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy(AMCP)。AMCP 从 PRIME 获得资助,以协助开发调查和撰写手稿。资助者在研究设计、执行、分析或报告方面没有任何作用。Greene 和 Pardo 受雇于 PRIME。Singh 和 Carden 受雇于 AMCP。Greene、Singh、Carden 和 Pardo 没有其他披露。Lichtenstein 因担任继续教育课程的教师和为 Pfizer、Cellceutix 和 Merck 担任顾问而获得 PRIME 的酬金。