1 Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, Texas.
2 Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, and Center for Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jan;25(1):29-38. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.1.029.
Psychotropic polypharmacy is a concern in the management of pediatric mental disorders due to the lack of pediatric data to support the practice. Although seeing multiple providers has been identified as an important predictor of polypharmacy, no study has yet assessed the effect of care coordination between providers on receipt of psychotropic polypharmacy.
To examine the association between the intensity of care coordination within a patient's care team and the likelihood of the patient receiving multiclass psychotropic polypharmacy.
A retrospective study was conducted using the 2013-2015 administrative claims data from a Medicaid managed care organization (Texas Children's Health Plan). Children and adolescents aged 18 years or younger with a diagnosis of a mental/behavioral disorder and receipt of psychotropic prescriptions from multiple prescribers were included in the study. Psychotropic polypharmacy was defined as the receipt of 2 or more psychotropic medications from different drug classes concurrently for 60 days or more. Care coordination was measured using social network analysis (SNA), a new technique included in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Care Coordination Measures Atlas. Care density, an SNA surrogate for care coordination, was calculated as the ratio of the sum of patients shared by physician pairs within a patient's care team to the total number of physician pairs. The Andersen behavioral model was used to guide multivariate logistic regression analyses conducted to assess the association between care density and the likelihood of patients receiving psychotropic polypharmacy after controlling for predisposing and need factors.
A total of 24,147 children and adolescents diagnosed with a mental/behavioral disorder were identified. About 34.0% (n = 8,092) of these individuals received psychotropic medications from multiple prescribers who were either primary care physicians (PCPs) or specialists. Logistic regression analysis showed a significant association between care density and the use of psychotropic polypharmacy. However, the direction of this relationship varied depending on the composition of the patient's care team. Among patients with only PCPs involved in their care team, patients in the higher care-density group were 28% less likely to receive psychotropic polypharmacy (OR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.62-0.96) than those in the lower care-density group. In contrast, among patients who had both PCPs and specialists involved in their care team, those in the higher care-density group were 2 times more likely to experience psychotropic polypharmacy (OR = 2.01; 95% CI = 1.68-2.40). Care density was not significantly associated with the receipt of psychotropic polypharmacy in the specialist-only group.
This study found significant associations between care density and prescription of psychotropic polypharmacy. This relationship varied depending on the patient's diagnosis, disease complexity, and composition of the patient's care team.
No outside funding supported this study. The authors do not have any financial relationships or potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose. The abstract for part of this study, titled "Association Between Physician Care Coordination and the Use of Psychotropic Polypharmacy in the Management of Pediatric Mental Disorders," was selected as a silver medal abstract and was presented at the AMCP Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy Annual Meeting 2017; March 27-30, 2017; Denver, CO.
由于缺乏儿科数据来支持这种做法,精神药物的多药治疗在小儿精神障碍的管理中令人担忧。尽管已经发现看多个提供者是多药治疗的一个重要预测因素,但尚无研究评估提供者之间的护理协调对接受精神药物多药治疗的影响。
研究患者护理团队内护理协调的强度与患者接受多类精神药物多药治疗的可能性之间的关联。
使用来自 Medicaid 管理式医疗组织(德克萨斯儿童健康计划)的 2013-2015 年行政索赔数据进行回顾性研究。纳入年龄在 18 岁或以下、有精神/行为障碍诊断且接受多位处方者开具的精神药物处方的儿童和青少年。多药治疗被定义为同时使用来自不同药物类别的 2 种或更多种精神药物治疗 60 天或以上。护理协调使用社会网络分析(SNA)进行衡量,这是医疗保健研究和质量护理协调措施图谱中包含的一项新技术。护理密度是 SNA 对护理协调的替代指标,计算为患者护理团队中医生对之间共享的患者数量与医生对总数的比值。采用 Andersen 行为模型指导多元逻辑回归分析,以评估在控制倾向和需求因素后,护理密度与患者接受精神药物多药治疗的可能性之间的关联。
共确定了 24147 名被诊断患有精神/行为障碍的儿童和青少年。这些人中约有 34.0%(n=8092)接受了来自初级保健医生(PCP)或专科医生的多位处方者开具的精神药物。逻辑回归分析显示,护理密度与精神药物多药治疗的使用之间存在显著关联。然而,这种关系的方向取决于患者护理团队的组成。在仅由 PCP 参与其护理团队的患者中,处于较高护理密度组的患者接受精神药物多药治疗的可能性降低 28%(OR=0.72;95%CI=0.62-0.96),而处于较低护理密度组的患者接受精神药物多药治疗的可能性降低 28%。相比之下,在 PCP 和专科医生均参与其护理团队的患者中,处于较高护理密度组的患者接受精神药物多药治疗的可能性增加 2 倍(OR=2.01;95%CI=1.68-2.40)。在仅专科医生组中,护理密度与精神药物多药治疗的接受率无显著关联。
本研究发现护理密度与精神药物多药治疗的开具之间存在显著关联。这种关系取决于患者的诊断、疾病的复杂性以及患者护理团队的组成。
本研究无外部资金支持。作者与本文无关的任何财务关系或潜在的利益冲突均不相关。本研究的一部分内容,题为“医师护理协调与小儿精神障碍管理中精神药物多药治疗的使用之间的关联”,被选为银牌摘要,并在 2017 年 AMCP 管理式医疗和专科药房年会(2017 年 3 月 27-30 日,科罗拉多州丹佛市)上发表。