Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Department of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
J Crohns Colitis. 2019 May 27;13(6):735-743. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy225.
There are no universally accepted guidelines regarding surveillance of ulcerative colitis [UC] patients after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA]. There also exists a lack of validated quality assurance standards for performing pouchoscopy. To better understand IPAA surveillance practices in the face of this clinical equipoise, we carried out a retrospective cohort study at five inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] referral centres.
Records of patients who underwent IPAA for UC or IBD unclassified [IBDU] were reviewed, and patients with <1-year follow-up after restoration of intestinal continuity were excluded. Criteria for determining the risk of pouch dysplasia formation were collected as well as the use of pouchoscopy, biopsies, and completeness of reports.
We included 272 patients. Median duration of pouch follow-up was 10.5 [3.3-23.6] years; 95/272 [35%] had never undergone pouchoscopy for any indication; 191/272 [70%] had never undergone pouchoscopy with surveillance as the specific indication; and 3/26 [12%] high-risk patients had never undergone pouchoscopy. Two cases of adenocarcinoma were identified, occurring in the rectal cuff of low-risk patients. Patients under the care of surgeons appeared more likely to undergo surveillance, but rates of incomplete reporting were higher among surgeons [78%] than gastroenterologists [54%, p = 0.002].
We observed wide variation in surveillance of UC/IBDU-IPAA patients. In addition, the rate of neoplasia formation among 'low-risk' patients was higher than may have been expected. We therefore concur with previous recommendations that pouchoscopy be performed at 1 year postoperatively, to refine risk-stratification based on clinical factors alone. Reports should document findings in all regions of the pouch and biopsies should be taken.
对于接受结直肠切除和回肠袋肛管吻合术(IPAA)后的溃疡性结肠炎[UC]患者,目前尚无普遍接受的监测指南。此外,对于执行袋内镜检查,也缺乏经过验证的质量保证标准。为了在这种临床平衡的情况下更好地了解 IPAA 的监测实践,我们在五个炎症性肠病[IBD]转诊中心进行了回顾性队列研究。
回顾了接受 IPAA 治疗 UC 或未分类 IBD [IBDU]的患者的记录,并排除了恢复肠道连续性后随访时间<1 年的患者。收集了确定袋发育不良形成风险的标准以及进行袋内镜检查、活检和报告完整性的情况。
我们纳入了 272 名患者。袋随访的中位时间为 10.5[3.3-23.6]年;95/272[35%]名患者从未因任何原因进行过袋内镜检查;191/272[70%]名患者从未因监测作为具体指征进行过袋内镜检查;3/26[12%]名高风险患者从未进行过袋内镜检查。发现了 2 例腺癌,发生在低风险患者的直肠袖口。由外科医生负责的患者似乎更有可能接受监测,但外科医生的报告不完整率(78%)高于胃肠病学家(54%,p=0.002)。
我们观察到 UC/IBDU-IPAA 患者的监测存在广泛差异。此外,“低风险”患者的肿瘤形成率高于预期。因此,我们同意先前的建议,即应在术后 1 年进行袋内镜检查,以便根据临床因素单独进行风险分层。报告应记录袋的所有区域的发现,并应进行活检。