Suppr超能文献

一项关于治疗性教育项目对接受经皮电神经刺激治疗的慢性下背痛患者影响的随机研究。

Randomized study of the impact of a therapeutic education program on patients suffering from chronic low-back pain who are treated with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

作者信息

Garaud Thomas, Gervais Christine, Szekely Barbara, Michel-Cherqui Mireille, Dreyfus Jean-François, Fischler Marc

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France and Université Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines.

Pain Management Unit, Hôpital Foch.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(52):e13782. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013782.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is often used for the treatment of low-back pain (LBP). However, its effectiveness is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of TENS in the treatment LBP when associated to a therapeutic education program (TEP).

DESIGN

Open randomized monocentric study.

SETTING

University hospital between 2010 and 2014.

PATIENTS

A total of 97 patients suffering from LBP.

INTERVENTIONS

Routine care (TENS group) or routine care plus a therapeutic education program (TENS-TEP group) based on consultation support by a pain resource nurse.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

EIFEL and Dallas Pain Questionnaire scores.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (44%) were still assessable at the end-of-study visit, whereas 33 (70%) were assessable at the same time point in the TENS-TEP group (P = .013). The EIFEL score and the Dallas score had a similar evolution over time between groups (P = .18 and P = .50 respectively). Similarly, there were no significant differences between the groups with respect to resting pain scores (P = .94 for back pain and P = .16 for leg pain) and movement pain scores (P = .52 for back pain and P = .56 for leg pain). At Month 6, there was no significant difference between the groups (P = .85) with regard to analgesics and social impact. Two patients presented a serious adverse event during the study (one in each group) but non-attributable to the treatment studied.

CONCLUSION

This study does not support the use of TENS in the treatment of patients with chronic LBP even though patients benefited from a therapeutic education program by a pain resource nurse. However, the higher number of premature withdrawals in the TENS group may be due to early withdrawal of patients who did not experience improvement of their symptoms.

摘要

背景

经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)常用于治疗腰痛(LBP)。然而,其疗效存在争议。

目的

确定TENS与治疗性教育计划(TEP)联合应用于治疗LBP的疗效。

设计

开放性随机单中心研究。

地点

2010年至2014年期间的大学医院。

患者

共97例LBP患者。

干预措施

基于疼痛资源护士的咨询支持,给予常规护理(TENS组)或常规护理加治疗性教育计划(TENS-TEP组)。

主要观察指标

EIFEL和达拉斯疼痛问卷评分。

结果

在研究结束访视时,22例患者(44%)仍可评估,而在TENS-TEP组中,33例患者(70%)在同一时间点可评估(P = 0.013)。两组间EIFEL评分和达拉斯评分随时间的变化相似(分别为P = 0.18和P = 0.50)。同样,两组在静息疼痛评分(背痛P = 0.94,腿痛P = 0.16)和运动疼痛评分(背痛P = 0.52,腿痛P = 0.56)方面无显著差异。在第6个月时,两组在镇痛药使用和社会影响方面无显著差异(P =

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9765/6314771/93444fb196ec/medi-97-e13782-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验