Katikireddy Chandra K, Acharya Tushar
Division of Cardiology, UCSF Fresno, 155 N Fresno St, Fresno, CA, USA.
Division of Cardiology, VA Central California Health System, 2615 E. Clinton Ave, Fresno, CA, 93703, USA.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 May;35(5):791-798. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-01515-3. Epub 2018 Dec 29.
The aim of this study was to determine non-invasive diagnostic markers by echocardiography that differentiate ischemic dilated (ICM) from non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NICM) in patients with new onset heart failure. We identified 100 consecutive new heart failure patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (valvular etiology excluded). Clinical risk factors, medication history, serum biomarkers, ECG and echocardiographic variables were compared between the ICM and NICM groups (as confirmed by coronary angiography). Mean age, left ventricular size and ejection fraction were 56 years, 6.1 cm and 26% respectively. A total of 24% had ICM. Patients with ICM were older (65 vs. 53 years; P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between ICM and NICM among 18 clinical variables, 7 laboratory tests, 6 EKG parameters and 10 of the 13 echocardiographic markers evaluated. Segmental wall thickness variability, regional wall motion abnormality and RV enlargement on echocardiogram (echo) differentiated ICM from NICM. Segmental thickness variability outperformed wall motion abnormality in diagnosing ICM with a sensitivity and specificity of 79.2 and 98.7% versus 62.5 and 84.2% respectively. RV enlargement was not sensitive but 90.6% specific for predicting NICM. Myocardial segmental thickness variability on echo, resulting from thinned infarcted or hibernating myocardium, is a highly sensitive and specific marker to differentiate ICM from NICM in new onset heart failure.
本研究的目的是通过超声心动图确定无创诊断标志物,以区分新发心力衰竭患者的缺血性扩张型心肌病(ICM)与非缺血性扩张型心肌病(NICM)。我们连续纳入了100例新发扩张型心肌病心力衰竭患者(排除瓣膜病因)。比较了ICM组和NICM组(经冠状动脉造影证实)的临床危险因素、用药史、血清生物标志物、心电图和超声心动图变量。平均年龄、左心室大小和射血分数分别为56岁、6.1 cm和26%。共有24%的患者患有ICM。ICM患者年龄较大(65岁对53岁;P<0.001)。在评估的18项临床变量、7项实验室检查、6项心电图参数和13项超声心动图标志物中的10项中,ICM和NICM之间未观察到显著差异。超声心动图上的节段性室壁厚度变异性、节段性室壁运动异常和右心室扩大可区分ICM和NICM。节段性厚度变异性在诊断ICM方面优于室壁运动异常,其敏感性和特异性分别为79.2%和98.7%,而室壁运动异常的敏感性和特异性分别为62.5%和84.2%。右心室扩大虽不敏感,但对预测NICM的特异性为90.6%。超声心动图上由梗死或冬眠心肌变薄导致的心肌节段性厚度变异性,是区分新发心力衰竭患者ICM和NICM的高度敏感和特异的标志物。