• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数据造假与学术诚信问题。

Data falsification and question on academic integrity.

机构信息

a St Antony's College, University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.

b College of Business Administration , Prince Sultan University , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Account Res. 2019 Feb;26(2):108-122. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1564664. Epub 2019 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1080/08989621.2018.1564664
PMID:30595069
Abstract

In this commentary, we argue that plagiarism is not a new problem in academic publishing and data falsification in recent times has received a great attention globally. Due to lack of literature, the objective of this study is to evaluate data falsification and academic integrity. Accordingly, the study presents the academic misconduct (Falsification/Fabrication of data and Concerns/Issues About Data) case of Professor James E. Hunton, a former top ranked accounting professor from Bentley University. The study shows how research fraud/data falsification activity in the academic world lacks honesty and morality. The study offers some recommendations for the detection of plagiarism and academic misconduct. In the age of the Internet and digital era, Crossref, iThenticate, the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) would help to detect plagiarism. However, the question remains on detecting data falsification in the academic world.

摘要

在这篇评论中,我们认为剽窃在学术出版界并不是一个新问题,而最近的数据伪造在全球范围内受到了极大关注。由于缺乏相关文献,本研究的目的是评估数据伪造和学术诚信问题。因此,本研究介绍了前 Bentley 大学排名靠前的会计教授 James E. Hunton 教授的学术不端(数据伪造/篡改和对数据的关注/问题)案例。该研究展示了学术世界中的研究欺诈/数据伪造活动缺乏诚实和道德。本研究为发现剽窃和学术不端行为提供了一些建议。在互联网和数字时代,Crossref、iThenticate、出版道德委员会(COPE)将有助于发现剽窃。然而,在学术领域检测数据伪造的问题仍然存在。

相似文献

1
Data falsification and question on academic integrity.数据造假与学术诚信问题。
Account Res. 2019 Feb;26(2):108-122. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1564664. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
2
Promoting Ethics and Integrity in Management Academic Research: Retraction Initiative.促进管理学术研究中的伦理与诚信:撤稿倡议。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):357-382. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9941-z. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
3
Falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism: the unholy trinity of scientific writing.伪造、编造和抄袭:科学写作的邪恶三位一体。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Oct 1;87(2):225-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.07.004.
4
Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?科学文献中的撤稿:研究造假的发生率在增加吗?
J Med Ethics. 2011 Apr;37(4):249-53. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040923. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
5
Science ethics education part II: changes in attitude toward scientific fraud among medical researchers after a short course in science ethics.科学伦理教育第二部分:医学研究人员在参加短期科学伦理课程后对科研欺诈态度的转变
J BUON. 2012 Apr-Jun;17(2):391-5.
6
[Academic misconduct of graduates and the credit education].[毕业生学术不端行为与诚信教育]
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2011 Oct;36(10):1021-4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2011.10.016.
7
Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study.发表不当行为和抄袭撤稿:一项系统的、回顾性研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Oct;28(10):1575-83. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.728131. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
8
Pitfalls and Misconducts in Medical Writing.医学写作中的陷阱与不当行为。
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2019 Dec;18(4):350-353. doi: 10.1177/1534734619870083. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
9
How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents.中国高校如何应对研究诚信和不当行为?对高校文件的审查。
Dev World Bioeth. 2019 Jun;19(2):64-75. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12231. Epub 2019 May 15.
10
Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018.1970 年至 2018 年间发表的遗传学文章被撤稿的原因和时间。
J Med Genet. 2019 Nov;56(11):734-740. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106137. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
A model of the interrelationship between research ethics and research integrity.研究伦理与研究诚信相互关系模型。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024 Dec;19(1):2295151. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2295151. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
2
The Reviewer Academy of the Society of Critical Care Medicine: Key Principles and Strategic Plan.危重病医学会评论员学院:关键原则和战略计划。
Crit Care Med. 2023 Sep 1;51(9):1111-1123. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005962. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
3
Reviewing Academic Integrity: Assessing the Influence of Corrective Measures on Adverse Attitudes and Plagiaristic Behavior.
审视学术诚信:评估纠正措施对负面态度和抄袭行为的影响。
J Acad Ethics. 2022 Dec 29:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s10805-022-09467-z.
4
Perception and reaction of Nanyang Technological University (NTU) researchers to different forms of research integrity education modality.南洋理工大学(NTU)研究人员对不同形式的研究诚信教育模式的感知和反应。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Aug 24;23(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00824-6.
5
Let's go swimming.我们去游泳吧。
Lab Invest. 2019 Apr;99(4):450-451. doi: 10.1038/s41374-019-0194-0. Epub 2019 Feb 5.