Suppr超能文献

事情从来都不是单方面的:为何美国必须停止在阿片类药物问题上摇摆不定。

There's Never Just One Side to the Story: Why America Must Stop Swinging the Opioid Pendulum.

作者信息

Rieder Travis N

出版信息

Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2018;8(3):225-231. doi: 10.1353/nib.2018.0071.

Abstract

For those of us knee-deep in the debate over ethical use of opioids during an epidemic, it is all too easy to draw battle lines and become either 'pro-opioid' or 'anti-opioid'. Historically, too, the attitudes within medicine and the general population have tended to swing back and forth between these two extremes. However, both extremes are unjustifiable, and so at this moment in history, we must try to stop swinging the opioid pendulum. What we need, instead, is a nuanced attitude toward opioids that acknowledges both their potential for benefit and their very real risks. In this paper, I make the case for this view by citing the powerful essays included in this symposium. In short, I suggest that were we to take any individual's experience with opioids as authoritative, we might run the risk of swinging that pendulum to one of the extremes. But by listening to the complex stories of everyone, we are more likely, I think, to recognize the need for care and compassion that necessitates a more subtle look at responsible opioid use.

摘要

对于我们这些深陷阿片类药物在疫情期间合理使用辩论的人来说,很容易划分阵营,成为“支持阿片类药物”或“反对阿片类药物”的一方。从历史上看,医学界和普通民众的态度也往往在这两个极端之间摇摆不定。然而,这两个极端都是不合理的,所以在这个历史时刻,我们必须努力停止摆动阿片类药物的钟摆。相反地,我们需要的是一种对阿片类药物的细致入微的态度,既要承认它们的潜在益处,也要认识到它们非常现实的风险。在本文中,我通过引用本次研讨会中强有力的文章来阐述这一观点。简而言之,如果我们将任何个人使用阿片类药物的经历视为权威,我们可能会有将钟摆摆向其中一个极端的风险。但我认为,通过倾听每个人复杂的故事,我们更有可能认识到关怀和同情的必要性,这就需要对阿片类药物的合理使用进行更细致的审视。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验