• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮瓣修复术后并发症的风险预测模型:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Risk prediction models for complications after flap repair surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Yang Jiebin, Qin Xinya, Hou Lili, Liu Yamei

机构信息

Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Sichuan, 610075, China.

Department of Nursing, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, China.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03072-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-025-03072-8
PMID:40866967
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the performance and applicability of risk prediction models for complications after flap repair and to provide guidance for building and refining models.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, SinoMed, VIP and Wanfang were searched for studies on risk prediction models for flap complications. The search period is from inception to December 28, 2024. The PROBAST tool was used to evaluate the quality of the prediction model research, and Stata 18 software was employed to meta-analyze the predictors of the models.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies were included, 28 risk prediction models were constructed, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) ranged from 0.655 to 0.964, with 16 prediction models performing well (AUC > 0.7). Eleven articles underwent model calibration, 16 were validated internally, and 3 were validated externally. The results of the PROBAST review revealed that all 16 studies were at high risk of bias. The incidence rate of flap complications was 14.8% (95% CI, 10.7 - 19.0%). Body mass index (BMI), smoking history, long flap reconstruction time, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and postoperative infection were independent risk factors for complications after flap repair (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The risk prediction model for complications after flap repair has certain predictive value, but the overall risk of bias is high, and there is a lack of external validation; thus, it needs to be further enhanced and optimized to increase its prediction accuracy and clinical practicability.

摘要

目的

系统评价皮瓣修复术后并发症风险预测模型的性能及适用性,为模型构建和完善提供指导。

方法

检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库、维普数据库和万方数据库中关于皮瓣并发症风险预测模型的研究。检索时间从建库至2024年12月28日。采用PROBAST工具评估预测模型研究的质量,使用Stata 18软件对模型的预测因素进行Meta分析。

结果

共纳入16项研究,构建了28个风险预测模型,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)范围为0.655至0.964,其中16个预测模型表现良好(AUC>0.7)。11篇文章进行了模型校准,16篇进行了内部验证,3篇进行了外部验证。PROBAST评价结果显示,所有16项研究均存在较高的偏倚风险。皮瓣并发症发生率为14.8%(95%CI,10.7 - 19.0%)。体重指数(BMI)、吸烟史、皮瓣重建时间长、糖尿病、高血压和术后感染是皮瓣修复术后并发症的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。

结论

皮瓣修复术后并发症风险预测模型具有一定的预测价值,但总体偏倚风险较高,且缺乏外部验证;因此,需要进一步加强和优化,以提高其预测准确性和临床实用性。

相似文献

1
Risk prediction models for complications after flap repair surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.皮瓣修复术后并发症的风险预测模型:一项系统评价与Meta分析
BMC Surg. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03072-8.
2
The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.生物标志物对改良心脏风险指数在预测非心脏手术患者主要不良心脏事件和全因死亡率方面的比较和附加预后价值。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD013139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013139.pub2.
3
Prediction models for adjacent vertebral fractures after vertebral augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.椎体强化术后相邻椎体骨折的预测模型:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur Spine J. 2025 May;34(5):1631-1640. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08785-1. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
4
Risk prediction models for deep venous thrombosis in patients with acute stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.急性脑卒中患者深静脉血栓形成的风险预测模型:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Jan;149:104623. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104623. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
5
Risk prediction models for depression in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症幸存者抑郁症风险预测模型:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 22;104(34):e43978. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043978.
6
Risk prediction models for biochemical recurrence of Chinese prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy based on magnetic resonance imaging examination: a systematic review.基于磁共振成像检查的中国前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发风险预测模型:一项系统综述
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Sep 1;15(9):8648-8662. doi: 10.21037/qims-2024-2843. Epub 2025 Aug 13.
7
Risk prediction models for delayed gastric emptying in patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胰十二指肠切除术后患者胃排空延迟的风险预测模型:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 28;15(7):e099350. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099350.
8
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Risk prediction models for renal injury in children with IgA vasculitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.IgA血管炎患儿肾损伤的风险预测模型:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2025 Jul 28;23(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12969-025-01120-4.
10
Risk prediction models for stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.盆腔器官脱垂(POP)手术后压力性尿失禁的风险预测模型:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Feb 8;25(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03584-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of a predictive nomogram for vascular crises in oral and maxillofacial cancer patients undergoing free flap surgery.接受游离皮瓣手术的口腔颌面癌患者血管危象预测列线图的开发与验证
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 4;19(12):e0314676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314676. eCollection 2024.
2
A nomogram for predicting outcomes following pedicled flap reconstruction of the lower extremity.下肢带蒂皮瓣重建术后结局预测的列线图。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Sep;96:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.05.024. Epub 2024 May 31.
3
Machine-Learning Assisted Screening of Correlated Covariates: Application to Clinical Data of Desipramine.
机器学习辅助的相关协变量筛选:应用于去甲丙咪嗪的临床数据
AAPS J. 2024 May 30;26(4):63. doi: 10.1208/s12248-024-00934-6.
4
Fibular free flap necrosis after mandibular reconstruction surgery with osteoradionecrosis: Establishment and verification of an early warning model.下颌骨放射性骨坏死重建手术后腓骨游离皮瓣坏死:早期预警模型的建立与验证
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jun;125(3):101730. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101730. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
5
Analysis of Survival Quality of Peroneal Artery Perforator Flap in Immediate Repairment and Reconstruction of Oral and Maxillofacial Malignancies.分析穿支皮瓣即时修复与重建口腔颌面部恶性肿瘤的生存质量。
J Craniofac Surg. 2023;34(5):e474-e477. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009336. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
6
Identification and Validation of a Novel Model: Predicting Short-Term Complications After Local Flap Surgery for Skin Tumor Removal.识别和验证一种新模型:预测皮肤肿瘤切除局部皮瓣手术后的短期并发症。
Med Sci Monit. 2022 Nov 17;28:e938002. doi: 10.12659/MSM.938002.
7
Flap failure prediction in microvascular tissue reconstruction using machine learning algorithms.使用机器学习算法预测微血管组织重建中的皮瓣失败情况。
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Apr 26;10(12):3729-3738. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i12.3729.
8
The effect of preoperative smoking and smoke cessation on wound healing and infection in post-surgery subjects: A meta-analysis.术前吸烟和戒烟对术后患者伤口愈合和感染的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2022 Dec;19(8):2101-2106. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13815. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
9
Development and Assessment of Machine Learning Models for Individualized Risk Assessment of Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis.机器学习模型在个体化乳房皮瓣坏死风险评估中的开发和评估。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jul 1;278(1):e123-e130. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005386. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
10
Diabetic foot ulcer, the effect of resource-poor environments on healing time and direct cost: A cohort study during Syrian crisis.糖尿病足溃疡,资源匮乏环境对愈合时间和直接成本的影响:叙利亚危机期间的队列研究。
Int Wound J. 2022 Mar;19(3):531-537. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13651. Epub 2021 Jul 4.