• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝硬化患者急诊住院后的感染及预后预测因素。

Infection and Predictors of Outcome of Cirrhotic Patients after Emergency Care Hospital Admission.

机构信息

4th Medical Department, Klinikum Süd, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.

2nd Medical Department, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Hepatol. 2018 Oct 16;17(6):948-958. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.7195.

DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0012.7195
PMID:30600289
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

We aimed to explore the impact of infection diagnosed upon admission and of other clinical baseline parameters on mortality of cirrhotic patients with emergency admissions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a prospective observational monocentric study in a tertiary care center. The association of clinical parameters and established scoring systems with short-term mortality up to 90 days was assessed by univariate and multivariable Cox regression analysis. Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) was used for automated variable selection. Statistical interaction effects with infection were also taken into account.

RESULTS

218 patients were included. 71.2% were male, mean age was 61.1 ± 10.5 years. Mean MELD score was 16.2 ± 6.5, CLIF-consortium Acute on Chronic Liver Failure-score was 34 ± 11. At 28, 90 and 365 days, 9.6%, 26.0% and 40.6% of patients had died, respectively. In multivariable analysis, respiratory organ failure [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.15], albumin substitution (HR = 2.48), non-HCC-malignancy (HR = 4.93), CLIF-C-ACLF (HR = 1.10), HCC (HR = 3.70) and first episode of ascites (HR = 0.11) were significantly associated with 90-day mortality. Patients with infection had a significantly higher 90-day mortality (36.3 vs. 20.1%, p = 0.007). Cultures were positive in 32 patients with resistance to cephalosporins or quinolones in 10, to ampicillin/sulbactam in 14 and carbapenems in 6 patients.

CONCLUSION

Infection is common in cirrhotic ED admissions and increases mortality. The proportion of resistant microorganisms is high. The predictive capacity of established scoring systems in this setting was low to moderate.

摘要

介绍和目的

我们旨在探讨入院时诊断的感染以及其他临床基线参数对急诊入院肝硬化患者死亡率的影响。

材料和方法

我们在一家三级护理中心进行了一项前瞻性观察性单中心研究。通过单变量和多变量 Cox 回归分析评估了临床参数和既定评分系统与 90 天内短期死亡率的关系。Akaike 信息准则 (AIC) 用于自动选择变量。还考虑了与感染的统计交互效应。

结果

共纳入 218 例患者。71.2%为男性,平均年龄为 61.1 ± 10.5 岁。平均 MELD 评分为 16.2 ± 6.5,CLIF 联盟急性慢性肝衰竭评分 (CLIF-C ACLF) 为 34 ± 11。在 28、90 和 365 天时,分别有 9.6%、26.0%和 40.6%的患者死亡。多变量分析显示,呼吸器官衰竭 [风险比 (HR) = 0.15]、白蛋白替代治疗 (HR = 2.48)、非 HCC 恶性肿瘤 (HR = 4.93)、CLIF-C-ACLF (HR = 1.10)、HCC (HR = 3.70) 和首次腹水发作 (HR = 0.11) 与 90 天死亡率显著相关。感染患者的 90 天死亡率显著更高(36.3%比 20.1%,p = 0.007)。32 例患者的培养物呈阳性,其中 10 例对头孢菌素或喹诺酮类药物耐药,14 例对氨苄西林/舒巴坦耐药,6 例对碳青霉烯类药物耐药。

结论

感染在肝硬化 ED 入院中很常见,并且会增加死亡率。耐药微生物的比例很高。在这种情况下,既定评分系统的预测能力较低到中等。

相似文献

1
Infection and Predictors of Outcome of Cirrhotic Patients after Emergency Care Hospital Admission.肝硬化患者急诊住院后的感染及预后预测因素。
Ann Hepatol. 2018 Oct 16;17(6):948-958. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.7195.
2
Serum sodium, model for end-stage liver disease, and a recent invasive procedure are risk factors for severe acute-on-chronic liver failure and death in cirrhotic patients hospitalized with bacterial infection.血清钠、终末期肝病模型以及近期的侵入性操作是因细菌感染住院的肝硬化患者发生严重急性慢性肝衰竭和死亡的危险因素。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Sep;30(9):1055-1059. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001184.
3
Chronic liver failure-consortium acute-on-chronic liver failure and acute decompensation scores predict mortality in Brazilian cirrhotic patients.慢性肝衰竭联盟急性加重慢性肝衰竭和急性失代偿评分可预测巴西肝硬化患者的死亡率。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul 28;23(28):5237-5245. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i28.5237.
4
Red blood cell distribution width independently predicts 1-month mortality in acute decompensation of cirrhotic patients admitted to emergency department.红细胞分布宽度可独立预测急诊科收治的肝硬化患者急性失代偿期1个月的死亡率。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan;30(1):33-38. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000993.
5
Single center validation of mortality scores in patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis with and without acute-on-chronic liver failure.肝硬化急性失代偿伴或不伴慢加急性肝衰竭患者死亡率评分的单中心验证
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec;52(12):1385-1390. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1369560. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
6
Scoring systems for 6-month mortality in critically ill cirrhotic patients: a prospective analysis of chronic liver failure - sequential organ failure assessment score (CLIF-SOFA).用于危重症肝硬化患者 6 个月死亡率的评分系统:慢性肝脏衰竭-序贯器官衰竭评估评分(CLIF-SOFA)的前瞻性分析。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Nov;40(9):1056-65. doi: 10.1111/apt.12953. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
7
Single-centre validation of the EASL-CLIF consortium definition of acute-on-chronic liver failure and CLIF-SOFA for prediction of mortality in cirrhosis.单中心验证 EASL-CLIF 联盟定义的慢加急性肝衰竭和 CLIF-SOFA 对肝硬化患者死亡率的预测价值。
Liver Int. 2015 May;35(5):1516-23. doi: 10.1111/liv.12597. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
8
Acute-on-chronic liver failure: A comparison of three different diagnostic criteria.慢加急性肝衰竭:三种不同诊断标准的比较。
Ann Hepatol. 2019 Mar-Apr;18(2):373-378. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
9
Comparison of the predictive value of scoring systems on the prognosis of cirrhotic patients with suspected infection.评分系统对疑似感染肝硬化患者预后预测价值的比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(28):e11421. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011421.
10
Complications constitute a major risk factor for mortality in hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure patients: a multi-national study from the Asia-Pacific region.并发症是乙型肝炎病毒相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者死亡的主要危险因素:亚太地区的一项多国家研究。
Hepatol Int. 2019 Nov;13(6):695-705. doi: 10.1007/s12072-019-09992-x. Epub 2019 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Emergency Department Utilization by Patients With Cirrhosis.肝硬化患者急诊科利用情况的综合评估
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 1;119(12):2444-2454. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002905. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
2
Serum lactate and mean arterial pressure thresholds in patients with cirrhosis and septic shock.肝硬化合并感染性休克患者的血清乳酸和平均动脉压阈值。
Hepatol Commun. 2024 Jan 5;8(1). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000353. eCollection 2024 Jan 1.
3
The Yin and the Yang of Hemostasis in End-Stage Liver Disease.
终末期肝病止血的阴阳平衡
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 4;12(17):5759. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175759.
4
Emerging concepts in the care of patients with cirrhosis and septic shock.肝硬化合并感染性休克患者护理的新观念
World J Hepatol. 2023 Apr 27;15(4):497-514. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i4.497.
5
CLIF-SOFA and CLIF-C scores for the prognostication of acute-on-chronic liver failure and acute decompensation of cirrhosis: A systematic review.CLIF-SOFA和CLIF-C评分对慢性肝衰竭急性发作和肝硬化急性失代偿的预后评估:一项系统评价。
World J Hepatol. 2022 Dec 27;14(12):2025-2043. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i12.2025.