• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝硬化合并感染性休克患者的血清乳酸和平均动脉压阈值。

Serum lactate and mean arterial pressure thresholds in patients with cirrhosis and septic shock.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Hepatol Commun. 2024 Jan 5;8(1). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000353. eCollection 2024 Jan 1.

DOI:10.1097/HC9.0000000000000353
PMID:38180993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10781124/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Sepsis-3 guidelines have incorporated serum lactate levels of >2 mmol/L in septic shock definition to account for higher observed mortality. Further evidence is needed to support this threshold in cirrhosis, as well as target mean arterial pressure (MAP) during resuscitation.

METHODS

This observational cohort study investigated the association between initial serum lactate and resuscitation MAP levels on in-hospital mortality in patients with and without cirrhosis. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit for the treatment of septic shock between 2006 and 2021 in a quaternary academic center were included. Patients with cirrhosis documented on imaging and International Classification of Disease codes (n=595) were compared to patients without cirrhosis (n=575). The association of intensive care unit admission lactate levels and median 2-hour MAP with in-hospital mortality and the need for continuous renal replacement therapy was assessed. The association between median 24-hour MAP and in-hospital mortality was analyzed post hoc.

RESULTS

Within the cirrhosis group, admission lactate levels of 2-4 and >4 mmol/L were associated with increased in-hospital mortality compared to lactate <2 mmol/L [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.69, CI: 1.03-2.81, aOR: 4.02, CI: 2.53-6.52]. Median 24-hour MAP 60-65 and <60 mm Hg were also associated with increased in-hospital mortality compared with MAP >65 mm Hg (aOR: 2.84, CI: 1.64-4.92 and aOR: 7.34, CI: 3.17-18.76). In the noncirrhosis group, associations with in-hospital mortality were weaker for lactate 2-4 and >4 mmol/L (aOR: 1.32, CI: 0.77-2.27 and aOR: 2.25, CI: 1.40-3.67) and median 24-hour MAP 60-65 and <60 mm Hg (aOR: 1.70, CI: 0.65-4.14 and aOR: 4.41, CI: 0.79-29.38).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support utilizing lactate >2 mmol/L in the definition of septic shock, as well as a target MAP of >65 mm Hg during resuscitation in patients with cirrhosis.

摘要

背景

Sepsis-3 指南将血清乳酸水平 >2 mmol/L 纳入脓毒性休克定义,以解释观察到的死亡率升高。需要进一步的证据来支持肝硬化中这一阈值,以及复苏期间的平均动脉压(MAP)目标。

方法

本观察性队列研究调查了初始血清乳酸水平与肝硬化患者和非肝硬化患者住院死亡率之间的关系。纳入 2006 年至 2021 年期间在一家四级学术中心因脓毒性休克入住重症监护病房的患者。对影像学和国际疾病分类编码(n=595)记录有肝硬化的患者与无肝硬化的患者(n=575)进行比较。评估重症监护病房入院时的乳酸水平和中位数 2 小时 MAP 与住院死亡率和持续肾脏替代治疗的关系。事后分析了中位数 24 小时 MAP 与住院死亡率之间的关系。

结果

在肝硬化组中,与乳酸 <2 mmol/L 相比,乳酸 2-4 mmol/L 和 >4 mmol/L 与住院死亡率增加相关[校正比值比(aOR):1.69,95%CI:1.03-2.81,aOR:4.02,95%CI:2.53-6.52]。中位数 24 小时 MAP 60-65 和 <60 mmHg 与 MAP >65 mmHg 相比,也与住院死亡率增加相关(aOR:2.84,95%CI:1.64-4.92 和 aOR:7.34,95%CI:3.17-18.76)。在非肝硬化组中,乳酸 2-4 mmol/L 和 >4 mmol/L (aOR:1.32,95%CI:0.77-2.27 和 aOR:2.25,95%CI:1.40-3.67)和中位数 24 小时 MAP 60-65 和 <60 mmHg(aOR:1.70,95%CI:0.65-4.14 和 aOR:4.41,95%CI:0.79-29.38)与住院死亡率的相关性较弱。

结论

这些发现支持在肝硬化患者中使用乳酸 >2 mmol/L 来定义脓毒性休克,以及复苏期间 MAP 目标 >65 mmHg。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/10781124/13547b7cf155/hc9-8-e0353-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/10781124/bc4b76250104/hc9-8-e0353-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/10781124/7707162abcb9/hc9-8-e0353-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/10781124/ad6063fe256e/hc9-8-e0353-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/10781124/13547b7cf155/hc9-8-e0353-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/10781124/bc4b76250104/hc9-8-e0353-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/10781124/7707162abcb9/hc9-8-e0353-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/10781124/ad6063fe256e/hc9-8-e0353-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866c/10781124/13547b7cf155/hc9-8-e0353-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Serum lactate and mean arterial pressure thresholds in patients with cirrhosis and septic shock.肝硬化合并感染性休克患者的血清乳酸和平均动脉压阈值。
Hepatol Commun. 2024 Jan 5;8(1). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000353. eCollection 2024 Jan 1.
2
The association between lactate, mean arterial pressure, central venous oxygen saturation and peripheral temperature and mortality in severe sepsis: a retrospective cohort analysis.乳酸、平均动脉压、中心静脉血氧饱和度及外周温度与严重脓毒症患者死亡率的相关性:一项回顾性队列分析
Crit Care. 2016 Mar 12;20:56. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1243-3.
3
[Improvement effect of early goal-directed therapy on the prognosis in patients with septic shock].早期目标导向治疗对感染性休克患者预后的改善作用
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Nov;27(11):899-905.
4
Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).制定脓毒性休克的新定义并评估新的临床标准:用于第三次脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际共识定义(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):775-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289.
5
Lactate Level Versus Lactate Clearance for Predicting Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock Defined by Sepsis-3.乳酸水平与乳酸清除率对 Sepsis-3 定义的脓毒性休克患者病死率的预测价值
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):e489-e495. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003030.
6
[Prognostic value of arterial lactate combined with central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference to arterial-to-central venous oxygen content difference ratio in septic shock patients].动脉血乳酸联合中心静脉与动脉血二氧化碳分压差与动脉血与中心静脉血氧含量差比值对脓毒症休克患者的预后价值
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Jan;32(1):39-43. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20191226-00007.
7
Prognosis of patients excluded by the definition of septic shock based on their lactate levels after initial fluid resuscitation: a prospective multi-center observational study.基于初始液体复苏后乳酸水平对脓毒性休克定义排除的患者的预后:一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2018 Feb 24;22(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1935-3.
8
The influence of a change in septic shock definitions on intensive care epidemiology and outcome: comparison of sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 definitions.脓毒症休克定义的改变对重症监护流行病学和结局的影响:脓毒症 2 期和脓毒症 3 期定义的比较。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2018 Mar;50(3):207-213. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2017.1383630. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
9
Patient survival, predictive factors and disease course of severe sepsis in Czech intensive care units: A multicentre, retrospective, observational study.捷克重症监护病房中严重脓毒症患者的生存情况、预测因素及疾病进程:一项多中心、回顾性、观察性研究。
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2016 Jun;160(2):287-97. doi: 10.5507/bp.2015.052. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
10
[Lactic acidosis - update 2018].[乳酸酸中毒——2018年更新]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2018 Aug;143(15):1082-1085. doi: 10.1055/a-0585-7986. Epub 2018 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between lactate-to-albumin ratio and all-cause mortality in critically ill cirrhotic patients with sepsis: a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.脓毒症的重症肝硬化患者乳酸与白蛋白比值和全因死亡率之间的关联:MIMIC-IV数据库的回顾性分析
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 24;25(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03686-5.
2
Association between lactate-to-albumin ratio and short-term prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure treated with artificial liver support system.乳酸与白蛋白比值与人工肝支持系统治疗慢性肝衰竭急性发作短期预后的关系。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Mar 1;37(3):327-336. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002885. Epub 2025 Jan 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Emerging concepts in the care of patients with cirrhosis and septic shock.肝硬化合并感染性休克患者护理的新观念
World J Hepatol. 2023 Apr 27;15(4):497-514. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i4.497.
2
A randomised-controlled trial (TARGET-C) of high vs. low target mean arterial pressure in patients with cirrhosis and septic shock.一项针对肝硬化合并感染性休克患者的高与低目标平均动脉压的随机对照试验(TARGET-C)。
J Hepatol. 2023 Aug;79(2):349-361. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
3
Accurate Identification of Patients with Cirrhosis and Its Complications in the Electronic Health Record.
电子健康记录中肝硬化及其并发症患者的准确识别。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Jun;68(6):2360-2369. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-07876-7. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
4
Cirrhosis Management in the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房中的肝硬化管理
Semin Liver Dis. 2023 Feb;43(1):117-132. doi: 10.1055/a-2015-1290. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
5
A randomized-controlled trial comparing 20% albumin to plasmalyte in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis-induced hypotension [ALPS trial].一项比较肝硬化合并脓毒症性低血压患者使用 20%白蛋白与血浆代用品的随机对照试验[ALPS 试验]。
J Hepatol. 2022 Sep;77(3):670-682. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.03.043. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
6
Serum lactate levels in cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis patients with septic shock.肝硬化和非肝硬化感染性休克患者的血清乳酸水平。
Acute Crit Care. 2022 Feb;37(1):108-117. doi: 10.4266/acc.2021.00332. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
7
Accuracy of International Classification of Diseases-10 Codes for Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertensive Complications.国际疾病分类第 10 版编码对肝硬化及门静脉高压并发症的准确性。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Aug;67(8):3623-3631. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07282-x. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
8
Comparison of 5% human albumin and normal saline for fluid resuscitation in sepsis induced hypotension among patients with cirrhosis (FRISC study): a randomized controlled trial.肝硬化伴脓毒症性低血压患者中 5%人血白蛋白与生理盐水用于液体复苏的比较(FRISC 研究):一项随机对照试验。
Hepatol Int. 2021 Aug;15(4):983-994. doi: 10.1007/s12072-021-10164-z. Epub 2021 May 25.
9
Lactate and number of organ failures predict intensive care unit mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.乳酸和器官衰竭数量可预测慢加急性肝衰竭患者的重症监护病房死亡率。
Liver Int. 2019 Jul;39(7):1271-1280. doi: 10.1111/liv.14083. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
10
Infection and Predictors of Outcome of Cirrhotic Patients after Emergency Care Hospital Admission.肝硬化患者急诊住院后的感染及预后预测因素。
Ann Hepatol. 2018 Oct 16;17(6):948-958. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.7195.