Suppr超能文献

对比标准 22 号针和新型 20 号前角芯活检针对胰腺病变进行内镜超声引导下组织采集的诊断效果。

Comparison of the Diagnostic Yield of the Standard 22-Gauge Needle and the New 20-Gauge Forward-Bevel Core Biopsy Needle for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition from Pancreatic Lesions.

机构信息

Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Gut Liver. 2019 May 15;13(3):349-355. doi: 10.5009/gnl18189.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the diagnostic yield of 20-gauge forward-bevel core biopsy needle (CBN) and 22-gauge needle for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) of solid pancreatic masses.

METHODS

The use of 20-gauge CBN was prospectively evaluated for 50 patients who underwent EUS-FNA from June 2016 to December 2016. Data were compared with those obtained by a retrospective study of 50 consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA using standard 22-gauge needles between December 2016 and April 2017. At least two punctures were performed for each patient; the sample from the first pass was used for cytology with or without histology and that from the second pass was used for histology. Sample quantity was evaluated using the sample obtained from the second pass.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy rate between the first and second passes (20-gauge CBN: 96% [48/50]; standard 22-gauge needle: 88% [44/50]). Samples >10× power fields in length were obtained from 90% (43/48) and 60% (30/50) of patients using the 20-gauge CBN and standard 22-gauge needle, respectively (p=0.01). Technical failure occurred for two patients with the 20-gauge CBN.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic accuracy of the 20-gauge CBN was comparable to that of the 22-gauge needle. However, two passes with the 20-gauge CBN yielded a correct diagnosis for 100% of patients when technically feasible. Moreover, the 20-gauge CBN yielded core tissue for 90% patients, which was a performance superior to that of the 22-gauge needle.

摘要

背景/目的:比较 20 号正向斜面活检针(CBN)和 22 号针在超声内镜(EUS)引导下对胰腺实性肿块进行细针抽吸(FNA)的诊断效果。

方法

2016 年 6 月至 2016 年 12 月,前瞻性评估 50 例接受 EUS-FNA 的患者使用 20 号 CBN 的情况。将这些数据与 2016 年 12 月至 2017 年 4 月期间连续 50 例接受 EUS-FNA 且使用标准 22 号针的患者的回顾性研究数据进行比较。每位患者至少进行两次穿刺;第一次穿刺的标本用于细胞学检查(或联合组织学检查),第二次穿刺的标本用于组织学检查。通过第二次穿刺获得的标本来评估标本量。

结果

第一次和第二次穿刺的诊断准确率无显著差异(20 号 CBN:96%[48/50];标准 22 号针:88%[44/50])。使用 20 号 CBN 和标准 22 号针的患者中,分别有 90%(43/48)和 60%(30/50)的患者获得长度>10×视野的标本(p=0.01)。有 2 例患者在使用 20 号 CBN 时出现技术故障。

结论

20 号 CBN 的诊断准确率与 22 号针相当。然而,在技术可行的情况下,使用 20 号 CBN 进行两次穿刺可使 100%的患者获得正确诊断。此外,20 号 CBN 可为 90%的患者获得核心组织,其性能优于 22 号针。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89d4/6529169/e2a0ddf1bda2/gnl-13-349f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验