Suppr超能文献

细胞朊蛋白既不与α-突触核蛋白寡聚物结合,也不介导其有害作用。

Cellular prion protein neither binds to alpha-synuclein oligomers nor mediates their detrimental effects.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Department of Molecular Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Brain. 2019 Feb 1;142(2):249-254. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy318.

Abstract

α-Synuclein oligomers are crucial players in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease. Some mechanisms involved in α-synuclein oligomer detrimental effects include membrane damage, neuroinflammation and protein-protein interactions. Recently, the cellular prion protein (PrPC) emerged as an interactor of α-synuclein oligomers, apparently mediating their detrimental activities. Through direct in vivo and in vitro approaches we herein investigated the existence of a direct cross-talk between α-synuclein oligomers and PrPC. In vitro, we assessed α-synuclein oligomer toxicity by comparing the effect in Prnp+/+ versus PrPC knockout (Prnp0/0) hippocampal neurons. Through an in vivo acute mouse model, where α-synuclein oligomers injected intracerebroventricularly induce memory impairment and neuroinflammation, we verified whether these detrimental effects were preserved in Prnp0/0 mice. In addition, PrPC-α-synuclein oligomer direct binding was investigated through surface plasmon resonance. We found that PrPC was not mandatory to mediate α-synuclein oligomer detrimental effects in vitro or in vivo. Indeed, α-synuclein oligomer toxicity was comparable in Prnp+/+ and Prnp0/0 neurons and both Prnp+/+ and Prnp0/0 mice injected with α-synuclein oligomers displayed memory deficit and hippocampal gliosis. Moreover, surface plasmon resonance analyses ruled out PrPC-α-synuclein oligomer binding. Our findings indicate that PrPC neither binds α-synuclein oligomers nor mediates their detrimental actions. Therefore, it is likely that PrPC-dependent and PrPC-independent pathways co-exist in Parkinson's disease.

摘要

α-突触核蛋白寡聚体是帕金森病发病机制中的关键因素。α-突触核蛋白寡聚体的一些有害作用机制包括膜损伤、神经炎症和蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用。最近,细胞朊病毒蛋白(PrPC)作为α-突触核蛋白寡聚体的相互作用蛋白出现,显然介导了其有害活性。通过直接的体内和体外方法,我们在此研究了α-突触核蛋白寡聚体和 PrPC 之间是否存在直接的串扰。在体外,我们通过比较 Prnp+/+ 和 PrPC 敲除(Prnp0/0)海马神经元中 α-突触核蛋白寡聚体的效应来评估 α-突触核蛋白寡聚体的毒性。通过急性小鼠模型,我们将 α-突触核蛋白寡聚体脑室内注射,诱导记忆障碍和神经炎症,验证这些有害作用是否在 Prnp0/0 小鼠中保留。此外,我们通过表面等离子体共振研究了 PrPC-α-突触核蛋白寡聚体的直接结合。我们发现 PrPC 不是介导 α-突触核蛋白寡聚体在体内或体外产生有害作用的必需因素。实际上,α-突触核蛋白寡聚体毒性在 Prnp+/+ 和 Prnp0/0 神经元中是相当的,而且注射了α-突触核蛋白寡聚体的 Prnp+/+ 和 Prnp0/0 小鼠都表现出记忆缺陷和海马神经胶质增生。此外,表面等离子体共振分析排除了 PrPC-α-突触核蛋白寡聚体的结合。我们的研究结果表明,PrPC 既不与 α-突触核蛋白寡聚体结合,也不介导其有害作用。因此,在帕金森病中,PrPC 依赖和非依赖途径可能同时存在。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验