头孢曲松的标准剂量方案是否适用于合并肌酐清除率升高的危重症患者?

Are Standard Dosing Regimens of Ceftriaxone Adapted for Critically Ill Patients with Augmented Creatinine Clearance?

机构信息

Pharmacy and Clinical Pharmacy Department, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Anesthesiology and Critical Care Department, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Feb 26;63(3). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02134-18. Print 2019 Mar.

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to determine whether augmented renal clearance (ARC) impacts negatively on ceftriaxone pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) target attainment in critically ill patients. Over a 9-month period, all critically ill patients treated with ceftriaxone were eligible. During the first 3 days of antimicrobial therapy, every patient underwent 24-h creatinine clearance (CL) measurements and therapeutic drug monitoring of unbound ceftriaxone. ARC was defined by a CL of ≥150 ml/min. Empirical underdosing was defined by a trough unbound ceftriaxone concentration under 2 mg/liter (percentage of the time that the concentration of the free fraction of drug remained greater than the MIC [], 100%). Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) was performed to determine the probability of target attainment (PTA) of different dosing regimens for various MICs and three groups of CL (<150, 150 to 200, and >200 ml/min). Twenty-one patients were included. The rate of empirical ceftriaxone underdosing was 62% (39/63). A CL of ≥150 ml/min was associated with empirical target underdosing with an odds ratio (OR) of 8.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.5 to 30.7;  < 0.01). Ceftriaxone PK concentrations were best described by a two-compartment model. CL was associated with unbound ceftriaxone clearance ( = 0.02). In the MCS, the proportion of patients who would have failed to achieve a 100% was significantly higher in ARC patients for each dosage regimen (OR = 2.96; 95% CI = 2.74 to 3.19;  < 0.01). A dose of 2 g twice a day was best suited to achieve a 100% When targeting a 100% for the less susceptible pathogens, patients with a CL of ≥150 ml/min remained at risk of empirical ceftriaxone underdosing. These data emphasize the need for therapeutic drug monitoring in ARC patients.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定增强的肾清除率(ARC)是否会对危重症患者头孢曲松的药代动力学(PK)/药效学(PD)目标产生负面影响。在 9 个月的时间里,所有接受头孢曲松治疗的危重症患者都符合条件。在抗菌治疗的前 3 天,每位患者都接受了 24 小时肌酐清除率(CL)测量和游离头孢曲松的治疗药物监测。CL 大于等于 150ml/min 定义为 ARC。经验性剂量不足定义为谷浓度下游离头孢曲松浓度低于 2mg/L(药物游离分数浓度大于 MIC 的时间百分比 [ ],100%)。蒙特卡罗模拟(MCS)用于确定不同 MIC 和 CL 三组(<150、150-200 和 >200ml/min)的不同给药方案的目标达标率(PTA)。共纳入 21 例患者。经验性头孢曲松剂量不足的发生率为 62%(39/63)。CL 大于等于 150ml/min 与经验性靶标剂量不足相关,优势比(OR)为 8.8(95%置信区间 [CI]为 2.5 至 30.7;  < 0.01)。头孢曲松 PK 浓度最好用双室模型来描述。CL 与游离头孢曲松清除率相关( = 0.02)。在 MCS 中,对于每种剂量方案,ARC 患者中未能达到 100%的患者比例明显更高(OR=2.96;95%CI=2.74 至 3.19;  < 0.01)。对于需要达到 100%的易感性较低的病原体,CL 大于等于 150ml/min 的患者仍有经验性头孢曲松剂量不足的风险。这些数据强调了在 ARC 患者中进行治疗药物监测的必要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索