Li Hongmei, Liu Chia-Chen, Zheng Hui, Huang Timothy Y
1Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL USA.
2Huffington Center on Aging, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA.
Transl Neurodegener. 2018 Dec 24;7:34. doi: 10.1186/s40035-018-0139-3. eCollection 2018.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a fatal disease that threatens the quality of life of an aging population at a global scale. Various hypotheses on the etiology of AD have been developed over the years to guide efforts in search of therapeutic strategies.
In this review, we focus on four AD hypotheses currently relevant to AD onset: the prevailing amyloid cascade hypothesis, the well-recognized tau hypothesis, the increasingly popular pathogen (viral infection) hypothesis, and the infection-related antimicrobial protection hypothesis. In briefly reviewing the main evidence supporting each hypothesis and discussing the questions that need to be addressed, we hope to gain a better understanding of the complicated multi-layered interactions in potential causal and/or risk factors in AD pathogenesis. As a defining feature of AD, the existence of amyloid deposits is likely fundamental to AD onset but is insufficient to wholly reproduce many complexities of the disorder. A similar belief is currently also applied to hyperphosphorylated tau aggregates within neurons, where tau has been postulated to drive neurodegeneration in the presence of pre-existing Aβ plaques in the brain. Although infection of the central nerve system by pathogens such as viruses may increase AD risk, it is yet to be determined whether this phenomenon is applicable to all cases of sporadic AD and whether it is a primary trigger for AD onset. Lastly, the antimicrobial protection hypothesis provides insight into a potential physiological role for Aβ peptides, but how Aβ/microbial interactions affect AD pathogenesis during aging awaits further validation. Nevertheless, this hypothesis cautions potential adverse effects in Aβ-targeting therapies by hindering potential roles for Aβ in anti-viral protection.
AD is a multi-factor complex disorder, which likely requires a combinatorial therapeutic approach to successfully slow or reduce symptomatic memory decline. A better understanding of how various causal and/or risk factors affecting disease onset and progression will enhance the likelihood of conceiving effective treatment paradigms, which may involve personalized treatment strategies for individual patients at varying stages of disease progression.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种致命疾病,在全球范围内威胁着老年人群的生活质量。多年来,人们提出了各种关于AD病因的假说,以指导寻找治疗策略的努力。
在本综述中,我们重点关注目前与AD发病相关的四个假说:普遍认可的淀粉样蛋白级联假说、广为人知的tau假说、日益流行的病原体(病毒感染)假说以及与感染相关的抗菌保护假说。在简要回顾支持每个假说的主要证据并讨论需要解决的问题时,我们希望能更好地理解AD发病机制中潜在因果和/或风险因素的复杂多层相互作用。作为AD的一个决定性特征,淀粉样蛋白沉积的存在可能是AD发病的基础,但不足以完全重现该疾病的许多复杂性。目前,类似的观点也适用于神经元内的过度磷酸化tau聚集体,据推测,在大脑中预先存在Aβ斑块的情况下,tau会驱动神经退行性变。虽然病毒等病原体感染中枢神经系统可能会增加AD风险,但这种现象是否适用于所有散发性AD病例以及它是否是AD发病的主要触发因素尚待确定。最后,抗菌保护假说为Aβ肽的潜在生理作用提供了见解,但Aβ/微生物相互作用在衰老过程中如何影响AD发病机制仍有待进一步验证。然而,该假说提醒人们,针对Aβ的疗法可能存在潜在的不良反应,因为它会阻碍Aβ在抗病毒保护中的潜在作用。
AD是一种多因素复杂疾病,可能需要综合治疗方法才能成功减缓或减少症状性记忆衰退。更好地理解各种影响疾病发病和进展的因果和/或风险因素,将增加构思有效治疗方案的可能性,这可能涉及针对疾病进展不同阶段个体患者的个性化治疗策略。