Park Hae Sang, Park Hyun Jung, Lee Junhee, Kim Pureum, Lee Ji Seung, Lee Young Jin, Seo Ye Been, Kim Do Yeon, Ajiteru Olatunji, Lee Ok Joo, Park Chan Hum
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, 77 Sakju-ro, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do 24253 Republic of Korea.
2Nano-Bio Regenerative Medical Institute, College of Medicine, Hallym University, 1 Hallymdaehak-gil, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do 24252 Republic of Korea.
Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018 Jul 14;15(4):415-425. doi: 10.1007/s13770-018-0136-8. eCollection 2018 Aug.
Several types of three-dimensional (3D)-printed tracheal scaffolds have been reported. Nonetheless, most of these studies concentrated only on application of the final product to an animal study and could not show the effects of various 3D printing methods, materials, or parameters for creation of an optimal 3D-printed tracheal scaffold. The purpose of this study was to characterize polycaprolactone (PCL) tracheal scaffolds 3D-printed by the 4-axis fused deposition modeling (FDM) method and determine the differences in the scaffold depending on the additive manufacturing method.
The standard 3D trachea model for FDM was applied to a 4-axis FDM scaffold and conventional FDM scaffold. The scaffold morphology, mechanical properties, porosity, and cytotoxicity were evaluated. Scaffolds were implanted into a 7 × 10-mm artificial tracheal defect in rabbits. Four and 8 weeks after the operation, the reconstructed sites were evaluated by bronchoscopic, radiological, and histological analyses.
The 4-axis FDM provided greater dimensional accuracy and was significantly closer to CAD software-based designs with a predefined pore size and pore interconnectivity as compared to the conventional scaffold. The 4-axis tracheal scaffold showed superior mechanical properties.
We suggest that the 4-axis FDM process is more suitable for the development of an accurate and mechanically superior trachea scaffold.
已有多种类型的三维(3D)打印气管支架的报道。然而,这些研究大多仅专注于将最终产品应用于动物研究,无法展示各种3D打印方法、材料或参数对创建最佳3D打印气管支架的影响。本研究的目的是表征通过四轴熔融沉积建模(FDM)方法3D打印的聚己内酯(PCL)气管支架,并确定取决于增材制造方法的支架差异。
将用于FDM的标准3D气管模型应用于四轴FDM支架和传统FDM支架。评估支架的形态、力学性能、孔隙率和细胞毒性。将支架植入兔的7×10毫米人工气管缺损处。术后4周和8周,通过支气管镜、放射学和组织学分析评估重建部位。
与传统支架相比,四轴FDM具有更高的尺寸精度,并且在预定义的孔径和孔隙连通性方面明显更接近基于CAD软件的设计。四轴气管支架显示出优异的力学性能。
我们认为四轴FDM工艺更适合开发精确且力学性能优越的气管支架。