Larsen Ture, Beier-Holgersen Randi, Østergaard Doris, Dieckmann Peter
Simulation Unit (SimNord), Department of Administration, Nordsjællands Hospital, Denmark.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nordsjællands Hospital, Denmark.
Heliyon. 2018 Dec 20;4(12):e01037. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01037. eCollection 2018 Dec.
An investigation to determine any consensus in opinions and views in the literature about challenges or barriers in training leadership for emergencies.
Leadership in emergencies is reported as being very important for patient outcome. A systematic review failed in 2016 to find any focused leadership training. In the literature, the research has described and focused on developing tools to evaluate leadership.
Articles identified in the systematic review combined with other reviews and opinions were included to incorporate experiences, perceptions and emotions connected with leadership training in emergency situations. Two qualitative content analyses were conducted. The first analysis searched for opinions about leadership and leadership training in emergencies. The method was abductive - inductive qualitative content analysis. The second analysis searched, on the basis of an article written in 1986, statements about challenges regarding leadership training in all articles. This method was directed qualitative content analysis.
In total 40 articles covering the years 1986-2016 were analysed. An explicit need for workable leadership training of team leaders in emergencies was identified. The importance of the teamleader in emergencies was repeatedly stressed by 31/40 articles, leadership training is needed or required was stated by 30/40 articles, 27/40 articles described the emergency situation as stressful, complex, chaotic or unpredictable, 17/40 described the importance of self-confidence by the teamleader, and 8/40 described that the situation was perceived as creating concern, anxiety or panic.
The literature recommends finding a solution to teach residents to gain courage and confidence in stressful surroundings. The literature recommends finding a way to work with body language, non-verbal communication, attitude and appearance in order to radiate credibility in a setting separated from medical knowledge.
进行一项调查,以确定文献中关于应急领导力培训中的挑战或障碍的意见和观点是否存在共识。
据报道,应急领导力对患者的治疗结果非常重要。2016年的一项系统评价未能找到任何针对性的领导力培训。在文献中,研究描述并专注于开发评估领导力的工具。
纳入系统评价中确定的文章,并结合其他综述和观点,以纳入与紧急情况下领导力培训相关的经验、看法和情感。进行了两项定性内容分析。第一次分析搜索关于应急领导力和领导力培训的意见。方法是溯因-归纳定性内容分析。第二次分析基于1986年撰写的一篇文章,在所有文章中搜索关于领导力培训挑战的陈述。此方法是定向定性内容分析。
总共分析了涵盖1986年至2016年的40篇文章。确定了对应急情况下团队领导者进行可行的领导力培训的明确需求。40篇文章中有31篇反复强调了团队领导者在应急中的重要性,40篇文章中有30篇指出需要或要求进行领导力培训,40篇文章中有27篇将紧急情况描述为压力大、复杂、混乱或不可预测,40篇文章中有17篇描述了团队领导者自信的重要性,40篇文章中有8篇描述该情况被认为会引起担忧、焦虑或恐慌。
文献建议找到一种解决方案,教导住院医师在压力环境中获得勇气和信心。文献建议找到一种方法来处理肢体语言、非语言沟通、态度和外表,以便在与医学知识无关的环境中展现出可信度。