Department of Psychology, McGill University, 1205 Dr. Penfield Avenue, H3A 1B1, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, V5A 1S6, BC, Canada.
Psychol Res. 2020 Jul;84(5):1407-1423. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1130-4. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
It is commonly accepted that attention is spontaneously biased towards faces and eyes. However, the role of stimulus features and task settings in this finding has not yet been systematically investigated. Here, we tested if faces and facial features bias attention spontaneously when stimulus factors, task properties, response conditions, and eye movements are controlled. In three experiments, participants viewed face, house, and control scrambled face-house images in an upright and inverted orientation. The task was to discriminate a target that appeared with equal probability at the previous location of the face, house, or the control image. In all experiments, our data indicated no spontaneous biasing of attention for targets occurring at the previous location of the face. Experiment 3, which measured oculomotor biasing, suggested a reliable but infrequent saccadic bias towards the eye region of upright faces. Importantly, these results did not reflect our specific laboratory settings, as in Experiment 4, we present a full replication of a classic finding in the literature demonstrating reliable social attention bias. Together, these data suggest that attentional biasing for social information is task and context mediated, and less robust than originally thought.
人们普遍认为,注意力会自发地偏向于面部和眼睛。然而,在这一发现中,刺激特征和任务设置的作用尚未得到系统的研究。在这里,我们测试了在控制刺激因素、任务特性、反应条件和眼动的情况下,面部和面部特征是否会自发地影响注意力。在三个实验中,参与者观看了正面和倒置的面部、房屋和控制的面部-房屋混合图像。任务是辨别以相等概率出现在面部、房屋或控制图像的前一个位置的目标。在所有实验中,我们的数据表明,对于出现在面部前一个位置的目标,注意力没有自发地偏向。实验 3 测量了眼动的偏向,表明存在一种可靠但不频繁的注视偏向,即注视正面的眼睛区域。重要的是,这些结果并不反映我们特定的实验室设置,因为在实验 4 中,我们完整地复制了文献中的一个经典发现,证明了可靠的社会注意偏向。总的来说,这些数据表明,对社会信息的注意力偏向是由任务和情境介导的,而且不如最初想象的那么强大。