DaVita Clinical Research, 825 South 8th Street, Minneapolis, MN, 55404, USA.
DaVita Institute for Patient Safety, Inc, Denver, CO, USA.
J Nephrol. 2019 Jun;32(3):453-460. doi: 10.1007/s40620-018-00576-w. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
Heparin is widely used to prevent coagulation during hemodialysis. Although systemic anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents are commonly prescribed in the hemodialysis population, the safety and efficacy of heparin in the presence of these medications is unclear. This retrospective cohort study considered adult hemodialysis patients treated in the United States (August 2015-July 2017). For each month, patients were ascribed a three-part exposure status (heparin use, anticoagulant use, antiplatelet agent use) based on electronic health records. Outcomes included anemia measures, peri-treatment bleeding and clotting, and hospitalization for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Within systemic medication exposure categories, associations of heparin use were examined using adjusted generalized linear, negative binomial, or Poisson models. Across all systemic medication exposures, heparin use was associated with lower erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) dose, higher hemoglobin levels, and lower monthly intravenous (IV) iron dose; lower rates of clotting during treatment and hospitalization for GI bleeding; and similar rates of peri-treatment bleeding. Associations with respect to ESA, IV iron, hemoglobin, and clotting were approximately twofold more potent in the absence of a systemic anticoagulant; the presence of an antiplatelet agent had little impact. Neither medication type influenced associations between heparin use and peri-treatment or GI bleeding. These results suggest that heparin use is safe and effective in the presence and absence of systemic anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. Clinical judgment must be applied to assess bleeding risk in individual patients; however, the decision to withhold heparin should not solely be based upon the concurrent use of anticoagulant or antiplatet agents.
肝素广泛用于预防血液透析过程中的凝血。虽然在血液透析人群中通常会开处全身抗凝剂和抗血小板药物,但在这些药物存在的情况下肝素的安全性和疗效尚不清楚。这项回顾性队列研究考虑了在美国接受治疗的成年血液透析患者(2015 年 8 月至 2017 年 7 月)。对于每个月,根据电子健康记录将患者分为三部分暴露状态(肝素使用、抗凝剂使用、抗血小板药物使用)。结局包括贫血指标、治疗前出血和凝血以及胃肠道 (GI) 出血住院治疗。在全身药物暴露类别内,使用调整后的广义线性、负二项式或泊松模型检查肝素使用的关联。在所有全身药物暴露中,肝素使用与较低的促红细胞生成素刺激剂 (ESA) 剂量、较高的血红蛋白水平和较低的每月静脉内 (IV) 铁剂量相关;治疗期间凝血和 GI 出血住院治疗的发生率较低;且治疗前出血的发生率相似。在没有全身抗凝剂的情况下,ESA、IV 铁、血红蛋白和凝血的关联大约增强两倍;抗血小板药物的存在几乎没有影响。这两种药物类型都没有影响肝素使用与治疗前或 GI 出血之间的关联。这些结果表明,在存在和不存在全身抗凝剂和抗血小板药物的情况下,肝素的使用是安全有效的。必须根据临床判断评估个体患者的出血风险;然而,不应仅仅基于同时使用抗凝剂或抗血小板药物来决定是否停用肝素。