Suppr超能文献

透析患者中非维生素 K 口服抗凝剂的应用:系统评价。

The use of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in dialysis patients-A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus.

出版信息

Semin Dial. 2022 Nov;35(6):463-480. doi: 10.1111/sdi.13098. Epub 2022 May 27.

Abstract

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are used for prevention of thromboembolic events, but their use in dialysis patients is debatable. This study investigated the available evidence for the use of NOACs in dialysis patients. Online databases were systematically searched for eligible studies including pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, cohort studies, and randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing NOAC with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or no anticoagulant treatment. Newcastle Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of bias tool were used for quality assessment. Twenty studies were identified (nine PK studies, two RCTs, and nine cohort studies). Most of the studies investigated apixaban or rivaroxaban. In dialysis patients, less accumulation was reported with apixaban and rivaroxaban compared to dabigatran and edoxaban. PK studies indicate that high dose apixaban or rivaroxaban should be avoided. The two RCTs (rivaroxaban/apixaban vs. VKA) were small and underpowered regarding stroke and bleeding outcomes. Most cohort studies found apixaban superior to VKA, whereas comparison of rivaroxaban with VKA yielded conflicting results. Cohort studies comparing apixaban high dose (5 mg) with low dose (2.5 mg) twice daily suggest a lower risk of stroke with high dose but also a higher risk of bleeding with high dose. Apixaban versus no anticoagulation was compared in one cohort study and did not lower the risk of stroke compared with non-treated regardless of apixaban dosage. Widespread use of NOACs in dialysis patients is limited by adequately sized RCTs. Available evidence suggests a potential for use of apixaban and rivaroxaban in reduced dose.

摘要

非维生素 K 口服抗凝剂(NOACs)用于预防血栓栓塞事件,但在透析患者中的应用存在争议。本研究调查了 NOAC 在透析患者中的应用的现有证据。系统地在线数据库中搜索了包括药代动力学(PK)研究、队列研究和比较 NOAC 与维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)或无抗凝治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)的合格研究。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具用于质量评估。确定了 20 项研究(9 项 PK 研究、2 项 RCT 和 9 项队列研究)。大多数研究调查了阿哌沙班或利伐沙班。与达比加群和依度沙班相比,透析患者中阿哌沙班和利伐沙班的蓄积较少。PK 研究表明应避免使用高剂量的阿哌沙班或利伐沙班。两项 RCT(利伐沙班/阿哌沙班与 VKA)规模较小且对卒中出血结局的评估能力不足。大多数队列研究发现阿哌沙班优于 VKA,而比较利伐沙班与 VKA 的结果则相互矛盾。比较阿哌沙班高剂量(5 毫克)与低剂量(2.5 毫克)每日两次的队列研究表明,高剂量时卒中风险较低,但高剂量时出血风险也较高。一项队列研究比较了阿哌沙班与无抗凝治疗,无论阿哌沙班剂量如何,与未治疗相比,均未降低卒中风险。由于缺乏足够大的 RCT,NOAC 在透析患者中的广泛应用受到限制。现有证据表明,阿哌沙班和利伐沙班可能需要减少剂量使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3022/9796794/bc331b2fb269/SDI-35-463-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验