Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜手术基础适应箱的内镜模拟改编:前 100 名参与者的绩效评估。

Adaptation of the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery box for endoscopic simulation: performance evaluation of the first 100 participants.

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Institute for Image Guided Surgery IHU-Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3444-3450. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06617-6. Epub 2019 Jan 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The paucity of readily accessible, cost-effective models for the simulation, practice, and evaluation of endoscopic skills present an ongoing barrier for resident training. We have previously described a system for conversion of the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery box (FLS) for flexible endoscopic simulation. Six endoscopic tasks focusing on scope manipulation, and other clinically relevant endoscopic skills are performed within a 5-min time limit per task. This study describes our experience and validation results with the first 100 participants.

METHODS

A total of 100 participants were evaluated on the simulator. Thirty individuals were classified as experts (having done over 200 endoscopic procedures), and 70 were classified as trainees (39 individuals reported having no prior endoscopy experience). Of the 100 participants, 55 individuals were retested on the simulator within a period of 4 months. These 55 individuals were also evaluated using the "Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills" (GAGES). T-tests and Pearson correlations were used where appropriate, values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Experts completed all six tasks significantly faster than trainees. For the 55 participants who were retested on the simulator, all tasks demonstrated evidence of test-retest reliability for both experts and trainees who did not practice in between tests. Moderate correlations between lower completion times and higher GAGES scores were observed for all tasks except the clipping task.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from the first 100 participants provide evidence for the simulator's validity. Based on task completion times, we found that experts perform significantly better than trainees. Additionally, preliminary data demonstrate evidence of test-retest reliability, as well as GAGES score correlation. Additional studies to determine and validate a scoring system for this simulator are ongoing.

摘要

背景

缺乏易于获取且具有成本效益的模拟、实践和评估内镜技能的模型,这是住院医师培训的一个持续障碍。我们之前曾描述过一种将腹腔镜手术基础箱(FLS)转换为软性内镜模拟的系统。该系统可进行 6 项内镜任务,重点关注器械操作和其他与临床相关的内镜技能,每项任务的时间限制为 5 分钟。本研究描述了前 100 名参与者的经验和验证结果。

方法

共有 100 名参与者在模拟器上进行了评估。30 人被归类为专家(完成了 200 多次内镜手术),70 人被归类为学员(39 人报告没有内镜手术经验)。在 100 名参与者中,有 55 名在 4 个月内再次接受模拟器测试。这 55 名参与者还接受了“胃肠道内镜技能综合评估”(GAGES)的评估。适当情况下使用 t 检验和 Pearson 相关性,小于 0.05 的值被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

专家完成所有 6 项任务的速度明显快于学员。对于在模拟器上再次接受测试的 55 名参与者,所有任务都为专家和未在两次测试之间进行练习的学员提供了测试重测可靠性的证据。除了夹闭任务外,所有任务的较低完成时间与较高 GAGES 分数之间均存在中度相关性。

结论

前 100 名参与者的结果为模拟器的有效性提供了证据。根据任务完成时间,我们发现专家的表现明显优于学员。此外,初步数据表明具有测试重测可靠性以及与 GAGES 分数的相关性。正在进行确定和验证该模拟器评分系统的其他研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验