Suppr超能文献

内镜医师在模拟结肠镜检查过程中的眼球注视。

Eye gaze of endoscopists during simulated colonoscopy.

机构信息

Surgical Simulation Research Lab, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 162 Heritage Medical Research Centre, 8440 112 St. NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada.

2-40 Zeidler Ledcor Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2020 Feb;14(1):137-143. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00950-1. Epub 2019 Mar 30.

Abstract

Regaining orientation during an endoscopic procedure is critical. We investigated how endoscopists maintain orientation based on video and eye gaze analysis. Novices and experts performed a simulated colonoscopy procedure. Task performance was assessed by completion time, total distance traveled, maximum depth of insertion, percentage of mucosa viewed, and air insufflation volume. Procedure videos were analyzed by transfers among three viewing areas: center of bowel lumen, edge of bowel lumen, and other structure without bowel lumen in sight. Performers' gaze features were also examined over these viewing areas. Experts required less time to complete the procedure (P < 0.001). Novices' scope traveled a greater distance (P < 0.001) and more scope was inserted compared to an expert (P < 0.001). Novices also insufflated more air than experts (P < 0.001). Experts maintained the view of bowel lumen in the middle of the screen, while novices often left it on the edge (P = 0.032). When disorientation happened, novices brought the view to the edge more frequently than the center. However, experts were able to bring it back to the center directly. Eye tracking showed that the rate of saccades in experts increased when the bowel lumen moved away from the central view, such a behavior was not observed in novices. Maintaining a centered view of the bowel lumen is a strategy used by expert endoscopists. Video and eye tracking analysis revealed a key difference in eye gaze behavior when regaining orientation between novice and experienced endoscopists.

摘要

在内镜检查过程中重新获得方向感至关重要。我们研究了内镜医师如何基于视频和眼动分析来保持方向感。新手和专家进行了模拟结肠镜检查。通过完成时间、总行进距离、最大插入深度、观察到的黏膜百分比和空气注入量来评估任务表现。通过在三个观察区域(肠腔中心、肠腔边缘和未观察到肠腔的其他结构)之间的转移来分析手术视频。还检查了表演者在这些观察区域的注视特征。专家完成手术所需的时间更短(P < 0.001)。新手的内镜行进距离更大(P < 0.001),插入的内镜更多(P < 0.001)。新手还比专家注入了更多的空气(P < 0.001)。专家将肠腔的视野保持在屏幕中央,而新手则经常将其留在边缘(P = 0.032)。当出现定向障碍时,新手比专家更频繁地将视野带到边缘。然而,专家能够直接将其带回到中心。眼动追踪显示,当肠腔从中央视野移开时,专家的扫视率增加,而新手则没有观察到这种行为。保持肠腔的中心视野是专家内镜医师使用的一种策略。视频和眼动追踪分析揭示了新手和经验丰富的内镜医师在重新获得方向感时眼动行为的关键差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验