Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Legs + Walking Lab, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2019 Jun;18(3):733-751. doi: 10.1007/s10237-018-01112-2. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
The pathogenesis and pathophysiological underpinnings of cartilage degradation are not well understood. Either mechanically or enzymatically mediated degeneration at the fibril level can lead to acute focal injuries that will, overtime, cause significant cartilage degradation. Understanding the relationship between external loading and the basic molecular structure of cartilage requires establishing a connection between the fibril-level defects and its aggregate effect on cartilage. In this work, we provide a multiscale constitutive model of cartilage to elucidate the effect of two plausible fibril degradation mechanisms on the aggregate tissue: tropocollagen crosslink failure (β) and a generalized surface degradation (δ). Using our model, the mechanics of aggregate tissue shows differed yield stress and post-yield behavior after crosslink failure and surface degradation compared to intact cartilage, and the tissue-level aggregate behaviors are different from the fibrillar behaviors observed in the molecular dynamics simulations. We also compared the effect of fibrillar defects in terms of crosslink failure and surface degradation in different layers of cartilage within the macroscale tissue construct during a simulated nanoindentation test. Although the mechanical properties of cartilage tissue were largely contingent upon the mechanical properties of the fibril, the macroscale mechanics of cartilage tissue showed ~ 10% variation in yield strain (tissue yield strain: ~ 27 to ~ 37%) compared to fibrillar yield strain (fibrillar yield strain: ~ 16 to ~ 26%) for crosslink failure and ~ 7% difference for the surface degradation (yield strain variations at the tissue: ~ 30 to ~ 37% and fibril: ~ 24 to ~ 26%) at the superficial layer. The yield strain was further delayed in middle layers at least up to 30% irrespective of the failure mechanisms. The cartilage tissue appeared to withstand more strain than the fibrils. The degeneration mechanisms of fibril differentially influenced the aggregate mechanics of cartilage, and the deviation may be attributed to fiber-matrix interplay, depth-dependent fiber orientation and fibrillar defects with different degradation mechanisms. The understanding of the aggregate stress-strain behavior of cartilage tissue, cartilage degradation and its underlying biomechanical factors is important for developing engineering approaches and therapeutic interventions for cartilage pathologies.
软骨降解的发病机制和病理生理基础尚不清楚。在纤维水平上,无论是机械介导还是酶介导的退化,都可能导致急性局灶性损伤,随着时间的推移,这些损伤会导致明显的软骨降解。了解外部负荷与软骨基本分子结构之间的关系,需要在纤维水平缺陷与其对软骨的总体效应之间建立联系。在这项工作中,我们提供了软骨的多尺度本构模型,以阐明两种可能的纤维降解机制对聚合组织的影响:原纤维胶原交联失效(β)和广义表面降解(δ)。使用我们的模型,与完整软骨相比,在交联失效和表面降解后,聚合组织的力学表现出不同的屈服应力和屈服后行为,并且组织水平的聚合行为与分子动力学模拟中观察到的纤维行为不同。我们还比较了在模拟纳米压痕试验中,宏观组织构建中不同层的软骨内纤维缺陷的交联失效和表面降解对纤维的影响。尽管软骨组织的力学性能在很大程度上取决于纤维的力学性能,但与纤维的屈服应变相比(纤维的屈服应变:16 至26%),软骨组织的宏观力学性能显示出10%的屈服应变(组织的屈服应变:27 至37%)差异,而在表面降解时,差异约为7%(组织的屈服应变变化:30 至37%和纤维:24 至26%),在浅层中。无论失效机制如何,中间层的屈服应变至少延迟了 30%。软骨组织似乎能够承受比纤维更大的应变。纤维的退化机制对软骨的聚合力学有不同的影响,这种偏差可能归因于纤维-基质相互作用、深度依赖的纤维取向以及具有不同降解机制的纤维缺陷。了解软骨组织的聚合应力-应变行为、软骨降解及其潜在的生物力学因素,对于开发治疗软骨病变的工程方法和治疗干预措施非常重要。