Suppr超能文献

CISDA:老龄化社会决策整合的变化。

CISDA: Changes in Integration for Social Decisions in Aging.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.

出版信息

Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2019 May;10(3):e1490. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1490. Epub 2019 Jan 3.

Abstract

The aging of our population has been accompanied by increasing concerns about older adults' vulnerability to violations of trust and a growing interest in normative age-related changes to decision making involving social partners. This intersection has spurred research on age-related neurocognitive and affective changes underlying social decision making. Based on our review and synthesis of this literature, we propose a specification that targets social decision making in aging to the recently proposed Affect-Integration-Motivation (AIM) framework. Our framework specification, Changes in Integration for Social Decisions in Aging (CISDA), emphasizes three key components of value integration with particular relevance for social decisions in aging: theory of mind, emotion regulation, and memory for past experience. CISDA builds on converging research from economic decision making, cognitive neuroscience, and lifespan development to outline how age-related changes to neurocognition and behavior impact social decision making. We conclude with recommendations for future research based on CISDA's predictions, including implications for the development of interventions to enhance social decision outcomes in older adults. This article is categorized under: Economics > Individual Decision Making Psychology > Reasoning and Decision Making Psychology > Development and Aging Neuroscience > Cognition.

摘要

人口老龄化伴随着人们对老年人易受信任侵害的担忧日益增加,以及对涉及社会伙伴的决策中与年龄相关的规范性变化越来越感兴趣。这一交叉点促使人们对社会决策背后的与年龄相关的神经认知和情感变化进行研究。基于我们对这一文献的综述和综合,我们提出了一个针对老龄化社会决策的规范,该规范针对最近提出的情感整合动机(AIM)框架。我们的框架规范,即老龄化中社会决策的整合变化(CISDA),强调了与老龄化社会决策特别相关的价值整合的三个关键组成部分:心理理论、情绪调节和对过去经验的记忆。CISDA 建立在经济决策、认知神经科学和寿命发展的融合研究基础上,概述了神经认知和行为的年龄相关变化如何影响社会决策。我们根据 CISDA 的预测为未来的研究提出了建议,包括对增强老年人社会决策结果的干预措施的发展的影响。本文属于以下分类:经济学>个体决策心理学>推理和决策心理学>发展与老龄化神经科学>认知。

相似文献

1
CISDA: Changes in Integration for Social Decisions in Aging.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2019 May;10(3):e1490. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1490. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
2
Neurocomputational models of altruistic decision-making and social motives: Advances, pitfalls, and future directions.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2021 Nov;12(6):e1571. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1571. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
3
Prosocial behavior in aging: which factors can explain age-related differences in social-economic decision making?
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 Dec;31(12):1747-1757. doi: 10.1017/S1041610219000061. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
4
Aging and Decision-Making: A Conceptual Framework for Future Research - A Mini-Review.
Gerontology. 2018;64(2):140-148. doi: 10.1159/000485247. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
5
On the Social Life and Motivational Changes of Aging Monkeys.
Gerontology. 2017;63(6):572-579. doi: 10.1159/000477401. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
7
Aging is associated with maladaptive episodic memory-guided social decision-making.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 18;119(42):e2208681119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2208681119. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
8
Potential mechanisms contributing to decision-making difficulties in late adulthood.
Gerontology. 2010;56(4):430-4; discussion 435-40. doi: 10.1159/000275060. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
9
Theory of mind deficits partly mediate impaired social decision-making in schizophrenia.
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 May 5;17(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1313-3.
10
Cognitive decline, socioemotional change, or both? How the science of aging can inform future research on sacrificial moral dilemmas.
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2023 Mar;30(2):272-299. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2021.2019183. Epub 2021 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-group differences in trust-related decision-making and learning.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 2;14(1):68. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50500-x.
2
New directions for studying the aging social-cognitive brain.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Apr;56:101768. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101768. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
3
Age differences in the neural basis of decision-making under uncertainty.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jun;23(3):788-808. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01060-6. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
4
Facial Trustworthiness Perception Across the Adult Life Span.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 Mar 4;78(3):434-444. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac166.
5
Aging in an "infodemic": The role of analytical reasoning, affect, and news consumption frequency on news veracity detection.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2022 Sep;28(3):468-485. doi: 10.1037/xap0000426. Epub 2022 May 2.
6
Perceived stress in different countries at the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic.
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2022 Jul;57(4):309-322. doi: 10.1177/00912174211033710. Epub 2021 Jul 16.

本文引用的文献

1
A blunted phasic autonomic response to errors indexes age-related deficits in error awareness.
Neurobiol Aging. 2018 Nov;71:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.06.019. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
2
Investigating ToM in aging with the MASC: from accuracy to error type.
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2019 Jul;26(4):541-557. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2018.1500996. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
3
Cognitive and affective associations with an ecologically valid test of theory of mind across the lifespan.
Neuropsychology. 2018 Sep;32(6):754-763. doi: 10.1037/neu0000464. Epub 2018 May 24.
4
Uncovering Susceptibility Risk to Online Deception in Aging.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Feb 14;75(3):522-533. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby036.
5
Subjective value representations during effort, probability and time discounting across adulthood.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018 May 1;13(5):449-459. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy021.
6
Theory of mind and the Ultimatum Game in healthy adult aging.
Exp Aging Res. 2018 May-Jun;44(3):246-257. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2018.1449590.
7
Older adults' neural activation in the reward circuit is sensitive to face trustworthiness.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Feb;18(1):21-34. doi: 10.3758/s13415-017-0549-1.
8
Early childhood stress exposure, reward pathways, and adult decision making.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Dec 19;114(51):13549-13554. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708791114. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
9
Risk preference shares the psychometric structure of major psychological traits.
Sci Adv. 2017 Oct 4;3(10):e1701381. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1701381. eCollection 2017 Oct.
10
Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: a multi-level framework.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Oct 1;12(10):1545-1557. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx096.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验