• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成年期努力、概率和时间贴现过程中的主观价值表现。

Subjective value representations during effort, probability and time discounting across adulthood.

机构信息

Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development & Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

出版信息

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018 May 1;13(5):449-459. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy021.

DOI:10.1093/scan/nsy021
PMID:29618082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6007391/
Abstract

Every day, humans make countless decisions that require the integration of information about potential benefits (i.e. rewards) with other decision features (i.e. effort required, probability of an outcome or time delays). Here, we examine the overlap and dissociation of behavioral preferences and neural representations of subjective value in the context of three different decision features (physical effort, probability and time delays) in a healthy adult life span sample. While undergoing functional neuroimaging, participants (N = 75) made incentive compatible choices between a smaller monetary reward with lower physical effort, higher probability, or a shorter time delay versus a larger monetary reward with higher physical effort, lower probability, or a longer time delay. Behavioral preferences were estimated from observed choices, and subjective values were computed using individual hyperbolic discount functions. We found that discount rates were uncorrelated across tasks. Despite this apparent behavioral dissociation between preferences, we found overlapping subjective value-related activity in the medial prefrontal cortex across all three tasks. We found no consistent evidence for age differences in either preferences or the neural representations of subjective value across adulthood. These results suggest that while the tolerance of decision features is behaviorally dissociable, subjective value signals share a common representation across adulthood.

摘要

每天,人类都会做出无数需要整合潜在收益(即奖励)信息与其他决策特征(即所需努力、结果概率或时间延迟)的决策。在这里,我们在一个健康成年人的样本中,考察了在三种不同决策特征(体力消耗、概率和时间延迟)的背景下,行为偏好和主观价值的神经表示的重叠和分离。在进行功能神经影像学检查时,参与者(N=75)在较小的金钱奖励与较低的体力消耗、较高的概率或较短的时间延迟与较大的金钱奖励与较高的体力消耗、较低的概率或较长的时间延迟之间做出了激励相容的选择。行为偏好是根据观察到的选择来估计的,主观价值是通过个体双曲线折扣函数来计算的。我们发现,折扣率在不同任务之间没有相关性。尽管在偏好上存在明显的行为分离,但我们发现,在所有三个任务中,内侧前额叶皮层都存在重叠的主观价值相关活动。我们没有发现成年期偏好或主观价值的神经表示在年龄上存在一致差异的证据。这些结果表明,尽管决策特征的容忍度在行为上是可分离的,但主观价值信号在整个成年期都具有共同的表示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d12/6007391/0f01e8662909/nsy021f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d12/6007391/e23d84d09036/nsy021f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d12/6007391/e5c2891c2f9f/nsy021f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d12/6007391/45a68643e2ea/nsy021f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d12/6007391/6a5c18c75eec/nsy021f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d12/6007391/0f01e8662909/nsy021f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d12/6007391/e23d84d09036/nsy021f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d12/6007391/e5c2891c2f9f/nsy021f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d12/6007391/45a68643e2ea/nsy021f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d12/6007391/6a5c18c75eec/nsy021f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d12/6007391/0f01e8662909/nsy021f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Subjective value representations during effort, probability and time discounting across adulthood.成年期努力、概率和时间贴现过程中的主观价值表现。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018 May 1;13(5):449-459. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy021.
2
Separate and overlapping brain areas encode subjective value during delay and effort discounting.在延迟和努力折扣过程中,不同且相互重叠的脑区对主观价值进行编码。
Neuroimage. 2015 Oct 15;120:104-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.080. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
3
Individual Differences in Dopamine Are Associated with Reward Discounting in Clinical Groups But Not in Healthy Adults.个体多巴胺差异与临床群体的奖励折扣有关,但与健康成年人无关。
J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 9;39(2):321-332. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1984-18.2018. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
4
Enhanced Neural Responses to Imagined Primary Rewards Predict Reduced Monetary Temporal Discounting.对想象中的主要奖励的增强神经反应预示着货币时间折扣的降低。
J Neurosci. 2015 Sep 23;35(38):13103-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1863-15.2015.
5
Neural Signatures of Value Comparison in Human Cingulate Cortex during Decisions Requiring an Effort-Reward Trade-off.在需要权衡努力与回报的决策过程中,人类扣带回皮层中价值比较的神经特征。
J Neurosci. 2016 Sep 28;36(39):10002-15. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0292-16.2016.
6
Parabolic discounting of monetary rewards by physical effort.体力付出对货币奖励的抛物线式折扣。
Behav Processes. 2013 Nov;100:192-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.09.014. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
7
Frontotemporal Regulation of Subjective Value to Suppress Impulsivity in Intertemporal Choices.前额叶-颞叶对主观价值的调节作用抑制了跨期选择中的冲动性。
J Neurosci. 2021 Feb 24;41(8):1727-1737. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1196-20.2020. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
8
Adult age differences in decision making across domains: Increased discounting of social and health-related rewards.不同领域决策中的成人年龄差异:对社会和健康相关奖励的贴现增加。
Psychol Aging. 2016 Nov;31(7):737-746. doi: 10.1037/pag0000131.
9
Behavioral modeling of human choices reveals dissociable effects of physical effort and temporal delay on reward devaluation.人类选择的行为建模揭示了体力消耗和时间延迟对奖励贬值的不同影响。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Mar 27;11(3):e1004116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004116. eCollection 2015 Mar.
10
Discounting preferences and response consistency as markers of functional ability in community-dwelling older adults.将偏好折扣和反应一致性作为社区居住老年人功能能力的标志。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2014;36(10):1112-23. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2014.983464. Epub 2014 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Reduced cortical complexity in ventromedial prefrontal cortex is associated with a greater preference for risky and immediate rewards.腹内侧前额叶皮质的皮质复杂性降低与对风险和即时奖励的更大偏好有关。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Apr 18;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00143. eCollection 2024.
2
Charting the brain networks of impulsivity: Meta-analytic synthesis, functional connectivity modelling, and neurotransmitter associations.绘制冲动性的脑网络:元分析综合、功能连接建模及神经递质关联
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Sep 25;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00295. eCollection 2024.
3
Association between ADHD symptoms, physical effort discounting, and unhealthy lifestyles in adults.

本文引用的文献

1
Preferences for Temporal Sequences of Real Outcomes Differ Across Domains but do not Vary by Age.不同领域的真实结果时间序列的偏好不同,但与年龄无关。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Feb 15;74(3):430-439. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx094.
2
A decade of decoding reward-related fMRI signals and where we go from here.解码与奖励相关的 fMRI 信号的十年历程及未来展望。
Neuroimage. 2018 Oct 15;180(Pt A):324-333. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.067. Epub 2017 Jun 4.
3
FMRI Clustering in AFNI: False-Positive Rates Redux.AFNI中的功能磁共振成像聚类:再谈假阳性率
成人多动症症状、体力折扣与不健康生活方式之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 18;15(1):17255. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02024-9.
4
Cross-species translational paradigms for assessing positive valence system as defined by the RDoC matrix.用于评估由研究领域标准矩阵(RDoC)定义的正性效价系统的跨物种转化范式。
J Neurochem. 2025 Jan;169(1):e16243. doi: 10.1111/jnc.16243. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
5
Representation of Anticipated Rewards and Punishments in the Human Brain.人类大脑中预期奖励与惩罚的表征。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2025 Jan;76(1):197-226. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-022324-042614. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
6
Dopamine and acetylcholine have distinct roles in delay- and effort-based decision-making in humans.多巴胺和乙酰胆碱在人类的延迟和努力决策中扮演着不同的角色。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Jul 12;22(7):e3002714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002714. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Mapping the Neural Basis of Neuroeconomics with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Narrative Literature Review.利用功能磁共振成像绘制神经经济学的神经基础:一篇叙述性文献综述。
Brain Sci. 2024 May 18;14(5):511. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14050511.
8
Convergence of Age Differences in Risk Preference, Impulsivity, and Self-Control: A Multiverse Analysis.年龄差异在风险偏好、冲动和自我控制方面的趋同:多元宇宙分析。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Aug 1;79(8). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae092.
9
Value Estimation versus Effort Mobilization: A General Dissociation between Ventromedial and Dorsomedial Prefrontal Cortex.价值估计与努力调动:腹内侧前额叶皮层和背内侧前额叶皮层之间的一般分离
J Neurosci. 2024 Apr 24;44(17):e1176232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1176-23.2024.
10
Impact of self-control and time perception on intertemporal choices in gain and loss situations.自我控制和时间感知对得失情境下跨期选择的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 9;14:1324146. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1324146. eCollection 2023.
Brain Connect. 2017 Apr;7(3):152-171. doi: 10.1089/brain.2016.0475.
4
A Coordinate-Based Meta-Analysis of Overlaps in Regional Specialization and Functional Connectivity across Subjective Value and Default Mode Networks.基于坐标的主观价值网络与默认模式网络区域专业化及功能连接重叠的元分析。
Front Neurosci. 2017 Jan 19;11:1. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00001. eCollection 2017.
5
Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research.审视前沿:迈向透明且可重复的神经影像学研究。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Feb;18(2):115-126. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.167. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
6
Dread sensitivity in decisions about real and imagined electrical shocks does not vary by age.在关于真实和想象中的电击的决策中,恐惧敏感性不会因年龄而有所不同。
Psychol Aging. 2016 Dec;31(8):890-901. doi: 10.1037/pag0000136.
7
Adult age differences in decision making across domains: Increased discounting of social and health-related rewards.不同领域决策中的成人年龄差异:对社会和健康相关奖励的贴现增加。
Psychol Aging. 2016 Nov;31(7):737-746. doi: 10.1037/pag0000131.
8
Separate and overlapping brain areas encode subjective value during delay and effort discounting.在延迟和努力折扣过程中,不同且相互重叠的脑区对主观价值进行编码。
Neuroimage. 2015 Oct 15;120:104-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.080. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
9
Individual differences in the neural signature of subjective value among older adults.老年人主观价值神经特征的个体差异。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Jul;11(7):1111-20. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv078. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
10
Decision making in the ageing brain: changes in affective and motivational circuits.衰老大脑中的决策:情感与动机回路的变化
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015 May;16(5):278-89. doi: 10.1038/nrn3917. Epub 2015 Apr 15.