• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Fluid absorbency of retraction cords after soaking in aluminum chloride solution.

作者信息

Runyan D A, Reddy T G, Shimoda L M

机构信息

U.S. Army Dental Activity, Letterman Army Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1988 Dec;60(6):676-8. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90396-4.

DOI:10.1016/0022-3913(88)90396-4
PMID:3060598
Abstract

Soaking retraction cord in an aluminum chloride solution before placing into gingival sulci does not lessen the cord's ability to absorb fluid. Black silk suture is clinically ineffective and should be replaced with a dark, size 0 impregnated retraction cord.

摘要

相似文献

1
Fluid absorbency of retraction cords after soaking in aluminum chloride solution.
J Prosthet Dent. 1988 Dec;60(6):676-8. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90396-4.
2
Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin.预浸缩龈线对人牙龈边缘微循环的影响。
Oper Dent. 2002 Jul-Aug;27(4):343-8.
3
In vitro kinetic study of absorbency of retraction cords.缩龈线吸收性的体外动力学研究
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Jan;89(1):45-9. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.61.
4
Inhibition of polymerization of polyvinyl siloxanes by medicaments used on gingival retraction cords.用于牙龈收缩线的药物对聚乙烯基硅氧烷聚合反应的抑制作用
J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Aug;70(2):114-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90003-7.
5
Review and survey of medicaments used with gingival retraction cords.牙龈收缩线所用药物的综述与调查
J Prosthet Dent. 1985 Apr;53(4):525-31. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90640-7.
6
Retraction cords with aluminum chloride: effect on the gingiva.含氯化铝的缩龈线:对牙龈的影响。
Oper Dent. 1980 Autumn;5(4):138-41.
7
A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality.关于临床性能和印模质量的无绳和传统移位系统的临床比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 May;111(5):388-94. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
8
A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords and aluminum chloride paste.一项比较使用移位线和氯化铝糊的随机对照临床试验。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Jun;32(4):410-415. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12581. Epub 2020 May 22.
9
Dose-related effects of epinephrine on human gingival blood flow and crevicular fluid production used as a soaking solution for chemo-mechanical tissue retraction.
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jan;97(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.10.004.
10
Current methods of finish-line exposure by practicing prosthodontists.口腔修复医生目前采用的终点暴露方法。
J Prosthodont. 1999 Sep;8(3):163-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1999.tb00031.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Present status and future directions: Soft tissue management in prosthodontics.现状与未来方向:口腔修复学中的软组织管理
World J Methodol. 2025 Dec 20;15(4):104497. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.104497.
2
Efficacy of hemostasis and gingival retraction of Merocel strip compared with conventional retraction cord utilizing digital gypsum model: a randomized controlled trial.与传统缩龈线相比,使用数字石膏模型评估美洛赛条带的止血和牙龈退缩效果:一项随机对照试验
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 27;15(1):10508. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95612-8.
3
A Comparative Analysis of Post-Retraction Changes in Gingival Height after Conventional and Surgical Gingival Displacement: Rotary Curettage, Diode and Er:YAG Laser Troughing.
传统与手术性牙龈移位术后牙龈高度退缩变化的比较分析:旋转刮治术、二极管激光及铒激光制备龈沟。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 11;11(16):2262. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162262.
4
A comparative evaluation of amount of gingival displacement produced by four different gingival displacement agents - An study.四种不同牙龈退缩剂产生的牙龈退缩量的比较评估——一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019 Oct-Dec;19(4):313-323. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_288_19. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
5
Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement materials for efficacy in tissue management and dimensional accuracy.三种牙龈退缩材料在组织管理和尺寸精度方面疗效的比较评估
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019 Apr-Jun;19(2):173-179. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_285_18.
6
Comparative evaluation of three noninvasive gingival displacement systems: An study.三种非侵入性牙龈移位系统的比较评估:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Apr-Jun;18(2):122-130. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_225_17.
7
Evaluation of Fluid Absorbency of Retraction Cords after Immersing in Two Retraction Medicaments - An In-vitro Study.浸泡于两种收缩药物后收缩龈线吸水性的评估——一项体外研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Nov;10(11):ZC19-ZC22. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/22793.8803. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
8
Comparative clinical efficacy evaluation of three gingival displacement systems.三种牙龈退缩系统的临床疗效比较评估
J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015 Aug;6(Suppl 1):S53-7. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.166082.
9
Comparative evaluation of the amount of gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction systems: An in vivo study.三种不同牙龈退缩系统产生的牙龈移位量的比较评估:一项体内研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Apr-Jun;6(2):189-95. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.156043.