Suppr超能文献

单端环闭合式开放及腹腔镜阑尾切除术的结果

Outcomes of Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy With Single Endoloop Stump Closure.

作者信息

Kryspin Mitura, Wyrzykowsk Dorota

机构信息

General Surgery Department, Siedlce Hospital, Siedlce, Poland.

出版信息

JSLS. 2018 Oct-Dec;22(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00062.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been used for 35 years, the open approach (OA) is preferred worldwide. Widespread access to instrumentation in a number of centers has reduced economic and logistical obstacles. The aim of this work is to compare the results for patients with suspected appendicitis treated using an OA versus patients treated using LA.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all patients (N = 290) who underwent operation due to suspected appendicitis in the General Surgery Department from 2014 to 2017 was conducted. LA was performed in 91 patients, and OA was performed in 199 patients.

RESULTS

Average surgery duration was 67.8 minutes in the LA group and 62.9 minutes in the OA group ( =.082). It was necessary to perform 3 conversions (3.3%) from LA to OA. Wound infections occurred in 2.2% of patients in the LA group and in 12.6% of patients in the OA group ( = .007). A reduced duration of hospitalization was noted in the LA group (3.3 days) compared with the OA group (4.7 days) ( < .001).

CONCLUSION

The duration of LA is not considerably longer than that of OA. LA in patients with suspected appendicitis reduces the number of operation site infections compared with OA. LA with single endoloop stump closure is a safe method and may be recommended for wider applications.

摘要

背景与目的

尽管腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)已应用35年,但在全球范围内开放手术入路(OA)仍更受青睐。多个中心广泛配备手术器械减少了经济和后勤方面的障碍。本研究的目的是比较疑似阑尾炎患者采用OA治疗与采用LA治疗的结果。

方法

对2014年至2017年在普通外科因疑似阑尾炎接受手术的所有患者(N = 290)进行回顾性研究。91例患者接受LA,199例患者接受OA。

结果

LA组平均手术时间为67.8分钟,OA组为62.9分钟(P = 0.082)。有3例(3.3%)患者需由LA转为OA。LA组2.2%的患者发生伤口感染,OA组为12.6%(P = 0.007)。与OA组(4.7天)相比,LA组住院时间缩短(3.3天)(P < 0.001)。

结论

LA的手术时间不比OA显著长。与OA相比,疑似阑尾炎患者采用LA可减少手术部位感染的数量。单端环结扎残端闭合的LA是一种安全的方法,可推荐更广泛应用。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy With Single Endoloop Stump Closure.
JSLS. 2018 Oct-Dec;22(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00062.
3
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison.
Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):266-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0563-7. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
4
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
6
Laparoscopic versus traditional appendectomy for suspected appendicitis.
Am J Surg. 1993 Jun;165(6):670-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80785-8.
7
Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals.
Surgery. 2010 Oct;148(4):625-35; discussion 635-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.025. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
9
A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis: historical cohort study.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Aug;46(4):847-851. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01086-5. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
10
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes.
Arch Surg. 1997 Jul;132(7):708-11; discussion 712. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430310022003.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic Appendectomy versus Open Surgery.
JSLS. 2025 Jan-Mar;29(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00077. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
2
Laparoscopic appendectomy, stump closure and endoloops: A meta-analysis.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Sep 27;14(9):1060-1071. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.1060.
3
Amyand's hernia: a 10-year experience with 6 cases.
BMC Surg. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01306-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Are we meeting ACGME core competencies? A systematic review of literature on international surgical rotations.
Am J Surg. 2018 Oct;216(4):782-786. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.07.048. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
3
Closure methods of the appendix stump for complications during laparoscopic appendectomy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 13;11(11):CD006437. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006437.pub3.
5
Outcomes of complicated appendicitis: Is conservative management as smooth as it seems?
Am J Surg. 2018 Apr;215(4):586-592. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.10.032. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
8
The experience and awareness of laparoendoscopic procedures among Polish surgeons in everyday clinical practice.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017;12(1):13-18. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.66472. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
9
Learning curve after rapid introduction of laparoscopic appendectomy: are there any risks in surgical resident participation?
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 May 3;11:17. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0074-5. eCollection 2016.
10
Utility of the laparoscopic approach to surgical treatment of acute appendicitis in a single surgical unit.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2014 Jun;9(2):234-8. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2014.42511. Epub 2014 May 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验