• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较放射肿瘤学、航空和核能领域风险文化的演变。

Comparing the Evolution of Risk Culture in Radiation Oncology, Aviation, and Nuclear Power.

机构信息

From the School of Global Policy and Strategy, University of California, San Diego, California.

Department of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2020 Dec;16(4):e352-e358. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000560.

DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000560
PMID:30608909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7678666/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

All organizations seek to minimize the risks that their operations pose to public safety. This task is especially significant if they deal with complex or hazardous technologies. Five decades of research in quantitative risk analysis have generated a set of risk management frameworks and practices that extend across a range of such domains. Here, we investigate the risk culture in three commercial enterprises that require exceedingly high standards of execution: radiation oncology, aviation, and nuclear power.

METHODS

One of the characteristics of high reliability organizations is their willingness to learn from other such organizations. We investigate the extent to which this is true by compiling a database of the major publications on risk within each of the three fields. We conduct a bibliographic coupling analysis on the combined database to identify connections among publications. This analysis reveals the strength of engagement across disciplinary boundaries and the extent of cross-adoption of best practices.

RESULTS

Our results show that radiation oncology is more insulated than the other two fields in its adoption and propagation of state-of-the-art risk management tools and frameworks that have transformed aviation and nuclear power into high reliability enterprises with actuarially low risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Aviation and nuclear power have established risk cultures that cross-pollinate. In both nature and extent, we found a distinct difference in radiation oncology's engagement with the risk community, and it lags behind the other two fields in implementing best practices that might mitigate or eliminate risks to patient safety.

摘要

目的

所有组织都力求将其运营对公共安全构成的风险降至最低。如果他们处理复杂或危险的技术,这项任务就显得尤为重要。五十年来,定量风险分析的研究产生了一系列风险管理框架和实践,涵盖了一系列此类领域。在这里,我们研究了三个需要极高执行标准的商业企业的风险文化:放射肿瘤学、航空和核能。

方法

高可靠性组织的特征之一是愿意向其他此类组织学习。我们通过编制每个领域的主要风险出版物数据库来调查这种情况的真实性。我们对合并的数据库进行了书目耦合分析,以识别出版物之间的联系。该分析揭示了跨学科界限的参与程度以及最佳实践的交叉采用程度。

结果

我们的结果表明,与其他两个领域相比,放射肿瘤学在采用和传播已经将航空和核能转变为具有精算低风险的高可靠性企业的最先进风险管理工具和框架方面更加孤立。

结论

航空和核能已经建立了交叉授粉的风险文化。在性质和程度上,我们发现放射肿瘤学与风险界的参与存在明显差异,并且在实施可能减轻或消除患者安全风险的最佳实践方面落后于其他两个领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfd4/7678666/273d1f48568a/pts-16-e352-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfd4/7678666/e57aca4c3bb7/pts-16-e352-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfd4/7678666/af7d75674d84/pts-16-e352-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfd4/7678666/df604cf35955/pts-16-e352-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfd4/7678666/3078f3bce54c/pts-16-e352-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfd4/7678666/273d1f48568a/pts-16-e352-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfd4/7678666/e57aca4c3bb7/pts-16-e352-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfd4/7678666/af7d75674d84/pts-16-e352-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfd4/7678666/df604cf35955/pts-16-e352-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfd4/7678666/3078f3bce54c/pts-16-e352-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfd4/7678666/273d1f48568a/pts-16-e352-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing the Evolution of Risk Culture in Radiation Oncology, Aviation, and Nuclear Power.比较放射肿瘤学、航空和核能领域风险文化的演变。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Dec;16(4):e352-e358. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000560.
2
Incident learning in pursuit of high reliability: implementing a comprehensive, low-threshold reporting program in a large, multisite radiation oncology department.追求高可靠性的事件学习:在一个大型多机构放射肿瘤学部门实施全面、低门槛的报告程序。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Apr;41(4):160-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41021-9.
3
Causal factors for error in radiation oncology.放射肿瘤学中的误差因果因素。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Sep-Oct;7(5):354-355. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
4
The use of failure mode and effect analysis in a radiation oncology setting: the Cancer Treatment Centers of America experience.失效模式与效应分析在放射肿瘤学环境中的应用:美国癌症治疗中心的经验。
J Healthc Qual. 2014 Jan-Feb;36(1):18-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00199.x. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
5
The structure of incident learning systems for radiation oncology.放射肿瘤学事件学习系统的结构
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 May 1;86(1):11-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.12.012.
6
Near-misses are an opportunity to improve patient safety: adapting strategies of high reliability organizations to healthcare.险情未遂是改善患者安全的契机:将高可靠性组织的策略应用于医疗保健领域。
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Aug;23(4):292-6. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000177.
7
Leading article: What has an Airbus A380 Captain got to do with OMFS? Lessons from aviation to improve patient safety.社论:空客A380机长与口腔颌面外科有什么关系?从航空领域汲取的经验教训以提高患者安全。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jun;57(5):407-411. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 May 14.
8
Risk management in mental health: applying lessons from commercial aviation.心理健康中的风险管理:借鉴商业航空领域的经验教训。
Australas Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;18(1):4-6. doi: 10.3109/10398560903180125.
9
Applying aviation factors to oral and maxillofacial surgery--the human element.将航空因素应用于口腔颌面外科——人为因素。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jan;51(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.11.024. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
10
What went right? An analysis of the protective factors in aviation near misses.哪些方面做得对?航空飞行接近事故的保护因素分析。
Ergonomics. 2019 Feb;62(2):192-203. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1472804. Epub 2018 Sep 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating Hospital-Related Deaths Due to Medical Error: A Perspective From Patient Advocates.评估因医疗差错导致的医院相关死亡:患者权益倡导者的视角
J Patient Saf. 2017 Mar;13(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000364.
2
The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management.美国医学物理学家协会第100任务组报告:风险分析方法在放射治疗质量管理中的应用。
Med Phys. 2016 Jul;43(7):4209. doi: 10.1118/1.4947547.
3
Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US.医疗差错——美国第三大死因。
BMJ. 2016 May 3;353:i2139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2139.
4
A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care.一项新的、基于证据的医院护理相关患者伤害评估。
J Patient Saf. 2013 Sep;9(3):122-8. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182948a69.
5
Viewing health care delivery as science: challenges, benefits, and policy implications.将医疗保健服务视为科学:挑战、益处和政策影响。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct;45(5 Pt 2):1508-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01144.x. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
6
Are hospitals becoming high reliability organizations?医院是否正在成为高可靠性组织?
Appl Ergon. 2010 Sep;41(5):713-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.009. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
7
Managing complex systems in perioperative medicine.围手术期医学中复杂系统的管理。
Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2009 Fall;47(4):1-11. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e3181b47b24.